Blastness Channel Manager vs. Shiji Horizon Distribution:
Which Is Right for You?

The Decision

Choosing a channel manager is critical for your hotel's online distribution and revenue growth. Both Blastness Channel Manager and Shiji Horizon Distribution aim to streamline your inventory, rates, and availability across global channels, but they diverge significantly in scope, user feedback, and regional reach. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, market focus, and desired feature set.

Blastness offers a highly-rated, user-centric software with recent reviews demonstrating strong satisfaction, while Shiji’s product remains unreviewed and less accessible for smaller hotels. Which one aligns best with your property’s needs and growth ambitions?

Is Blastness or Shiji Horizon Better for Hotels?

Blastness, with a score of 79.32 and 81 reviews in the last six months, provides a well-supported, highly-rated channel management solution designed specifically for hotels looking to optimize online distribution. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and tangible revenue improvements.

Shiji Horizon, despite being a large-scale platform with 64 verified partners and extensive global reach, has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current performance and user satisfaction. Its broad partner network includes many GDSs and OTAs, but lack of recent feedback limits confidence in its immediate usability for your hotel.

Your choice depends on whether recent, user-driven validation matters more than broad connectivity. Are you prioritizing proven usability and support, or are you comfortable with an unreviewed platform offering extensive global integrations?

Blastness vs Shiji Horizon: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a channel manager that’s easy to implement, intuitively designed, and backed by recent positive user feedback, Blastness is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for small to mid-sized hotels seeking reliable support, quick onboarding, and measurable revenue gains.

For larger hotels, multi-property groups, or those requiring a broad network of global channels, Shiji Horizon’s extensive partner list and GDS integrations might seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or verified user experiences, it’s risky for hotels that prioritize proven performance and support.

If quick deployment, dedicated support, and recent success stories are priorities, go with Blastness. If you need the widest global reach and are prepared to navigate an unreviewed platform, Shiji may suit your ambitions.

Is Blastness or Shiji Horizon Easier to Use?

Blastness’s UI scores a remarkable 4.84 out of 5, with onboarding rated 4.76 out of 5, indicating a highly accessible, user-friendly platform. Its recent reviews praise the system’s clarity, ease of integration with PMS, and straightforward navigation, making daily management simple.

Shiji Horizon, lacking recent reviews, provides no explicit data on usability or onboarding experience. Given its scale and complexity, it’s likely more suited for larger teams with dedicated technical staff, not smaller hotels seeking ease of use.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Features: Blastness or Shiji Horizon?

Blastness offers 8 features exclusive to its platform, including support for weekly and monthly rates, bulk updates, two-way real-time integrations, PMS connectivity, multi-currency support, integrated payment processing, and detailed reporting tools. These features directly address hotel needs for flexibility and control.

Shiji Horizon, with 7 shared features, does not list additional unique functionalities. Its focus appears more on extensive partner integration than specialized hotel-centric tools. Without detailed feature breakdowns, Blastness’s tailored solutions give it a clear edge in feature depth and usability.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Blastness or Shiji Horizon?

Blastness is rated 4.88 out of 5 for customer support, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, caring, and professional assistance. Customers praise their quick replies and proactive support, which are crucial during critical operational moments.

Shiji Horizon, with no recent reviews or ratings, leaves support quality unverified. As a global platform, support may be available around the clock, but the absence of user feedback raises questions about responsiveness and personalized service.

Edge: Blastness.

Which Has More Integrations: Blastness or Shiji Horizon?

Shiji Horizon boasts 64 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs, GDSs, and platforms like WeChat and TikTok. Its extensive network enables broad market coverage, especially in Asia.

Blastness has 15 verified partners, including key channels and integrations suited for smaller hotels or those focusing on specific regions. While its network is smaller, it covers the essential channels most hotels need.

If your hotel requires the broadest global reach and extensive partner options, Shiji’s network is advantageous. For reliable, proven integrations with a focus on core channels, Blastness is more manageable and user-friendly.

Edge: Shiji Horizon.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Blastness or Shiji Horizon?

Blastness, with over 81 recent reviews, consistently garners high satisfaction, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and a 4.88 support rating. Hotels of various sizes, especially independent and boutique properties, value its ease of use, reporting, and support.

Shiji Horizon’s lack of recent reviews prevents a meaningful comparison. Its larger presence and extensive partner network suggest potential, but without recent feedback, the current user sentiment remains unknown.

Based on available data, Blastness’s high ratings and recent positive feedback clearly favor it.

Edge: Blastness.

How Much Do Blastness and Shiji Horizon Cost?

Both Blastness and Shiji Horizon do not publicly list pricing details, which suggests they tailor quotes based on property size and needs. Expect to contact sales for customized quotes, with no apparent freemium or fixed monthly fee options.

Given the lack of pricing transparency, your decision should also weigh the value, support, and features offered in relation to your budget and operational scale.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Blastness?

• Hotels seeking straightforward, reliable channel management with proven reviews.
• Properties that want a user-friendly interface with quick onboarding.
• Hotels aiming to increase direct bookings and revenue efficiently.
• Smaller to mid-sized hotels needing high support levels and intuitive features.
• Teams that prioritize excellent customer service and recent positive feedback.

Not ideal if:

• You operate a large, complex multi-property group needing extensive GDS integration.
• Your hotel relies heavily on niche or less common distribution channels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Horizon?

• Large hotel groups or chains with complex distribution needs.
• Hotels requiring wide-reaching global channel access, especially in Asia.
• Teams with dedicated technical staff capable of managing sophisticated integrations.
• Hotels looking for extensive partner networks and GDS coverage.

Not ideal if:

• You're a small or boutique hotel prioritizing ease of use.
• You need immediate, recent user feedback to make a confident decision.
• Your focus is on local or regional channels without the need for global GDS reach.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Blastness Channel Manager is a highly-rated, user-focused solution proven with recent reviews. Its intuitive interface, dedicated support, and tailored features make it ideal for hotels seeking reliable, efficient distribution management.

Shiji Horizon Distribution offers extensive global integrations and a broad partner network, suitable for large hotel groups with complex needs. However, the absence of recent user reviews makes it a more uncertain choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance and support.

Choose Blastness if your hotel values recent, positive feedback, ease of use, and strong support. Opt for Shiji if your hotel requires the widest distribution reach and has the resources to manage more complex platforms, understanding the current absence of recent user data.