The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on understanding the core differences and strengths of each option. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, despite its extensive presence in certain markets, currently has no reviews, features, or regional coverage, making it difficult to evaluate for your needs. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts over 46 reviews, a strong overall rating of 4.04/5, and a proven track record in various regions. With recent reviews and a higher engagement level, Infor is clearly the more established choice.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in their deployment, feature sets, and market presence. BOCS offers little in the way of documented features or integrations, while Infor provides over 20 features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and extensive integration options. The decision should be based on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs.
Are you looking for a system that’s well-supported, feature-rich, and globally deployed? Or are you open to a less documented solution that might require more internal development? The answer will determine which product is right for your hotel.
Given the current information, Infor HMS is a clearly more suitable option for your hotel. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has no recent reviews, no visible customer support ratings, and no clear regional presence, which raises doubts about its applicability and reliability for most hoteliers. Meanwhile, Infor’s broad feature set, over 46 reviews, and 4.04/5 overall rating suggest it’s more capable of meeting diverse operational demands.
If your hotel values integration with other operational systems, robust reporting, and a proven track record, Infor is the logical choice. BOCS might be considered if you’re operating in a niche market with very specific needs not addressed by mainstream solutions, but the lack of recent data makes this a risky bet.
Are you prioritizing reliability, comprehensive features, or regional support? The answer guides you toward Infor, given its recent activity and higher user confidence.
Infor HMS scores an ease of use rating of 3.88/5, with reviews praising its intuitive navigation once familiar with its format. Support and onboarding are rated at 3.64/5, with many users citing quick onboarding and responsive support teams that ease the learning curve.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, on the other hand, has a zero rating across all categories, indicating no available user feedback on usability. This absence suggests a lack of recent deployment experience or documented user satisfaction, making it difficult to assess its ease of use.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 documented features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, online support, multi-currency handling, revenue management, and automated night audits — all of which are critical for modern hotels. Its features are designed for scalability and operational flexibility, with regular quarterly updates that introduce new functionalities.
In contrast, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shows no documented features, modules, or integrations. The absence of features makes it impossible to compare directly, but the lack of documented capabilities suggests it does not currently match the functional richness of Infor HMS.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor’s support is rated at 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Hoteliers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has a score of 0/5, with no recent reviews or customer testimonials available. The lack of data on support quality raises concern about ongoing assistance and issue resolution.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including popular booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, plus modules for revenue management, payment processing, and CRM. These integrations enable more streamlined operations and data consistency across systems.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES reports no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems or third-party tools. The absence of integrations could hinder operational efficiency, especially in larger or more complex hotels.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, Infor HMS is favored by hoteliers across many segments, including luxury, boutique, and city-center hotels. Recent reviews frequently mention its robustness and support, indicating high user satisfaction.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, lacking reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, cannot be rated or compared effectively. Its user satisfaction level remains unknown.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not publicly list their pricing models, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. However, the lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison impossible, and you should expect to contact sales for detailed proposals.
Not ideal if you need a proven, feature-rich system with support, scalability, and global presence. Hotels with complex operations or plans for growth should look elsewhere.
Not ideal if your hotel is a very small boutique with minimal operational complexity or if you prefer an open-source, highly customizable solution developed in-house.
Infor HMS is a clear leader for hotels that need a reliable, feature-rich, and well-supported property management system. Its extensive feature set, better user ratings, and large number of integrations make it suitable for mid-sized and large hotels seeking operational efficiency.
If your hotel prioritizes proven support, scalable features, and regional coverage, Infor HMS is the logical choice, especially given its recent reviews and high user satisfaction. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES, while potentially suitable for niche applications, lacks recent data, documented features, and support ratings, making it difficult to recommend confidently.
Choose Infor if you want a system with current, active reviews, robust features, and a proven track record. Opt for BOCS only if your needs are minimal, localized, or highly customized without reliance on a broad ecosystem or support infrastructure.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor