The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and maximizing revenue. You’re comparing BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Shiji Daylight PMS, two platforms designed to meet different needs. While BOCS offers a comprehensive management system tailored mainly for real estate firms, Shiji provides a cloud-native PMS tailored for hotels of all sizes. This article will help clarify which system aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs.
Both BOCS and Shiji aim to improve operational efficiency, but they serve different markets. BOCS is a property management system primarily focused on managing rental properties, tenants, and financial transactions, with AI-driven insights into tenant satisfaction and property performance. Conversely, Shiji’s platform is built for hotel operations, offering extensive features like guest profiles, online check-in, and integrated revenue management.
The core divergence lies in their target audiences: BOCS is suited for property managers overseeing residential or commercial real estate, while Shiji targets hoteliers seeking to optimize guest experiences and operational workflows. If your hotel is looking for a hospitality-specific solution, Shiji’s system will likely serve you better.
You should consider the scale and complexity of your property management needs. Are you managing a hotel with a focus on guest services, or are you handling property rentals and tenant interactions? The choice hinges on the primary function you want the system to support.
If your hotel needs a system that centralizes tenant and property data, with AI-driven insights into operational performance, BOCS might be appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and absence of verified integrations, it is less suitable for most hotel environments today.
For hotels seeking a modern, scalable solution with a broad feature set, proven support, and active user feedback, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear winner. With over 32 recent reviews, a high 4.63/5 ease of use rating, and a 4.53/5 support score, Shiji is designed specifically for hotel operations. Its extensive features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, and automation tools, address the complex needs of hospitality management.
If your focus is on property management beyond hospitality, BOCS may seem appealing; but for hotel-specific needs, Shiji’s dedicated platform is more appropriate. The decision points are clear when considering recent user experiences and feature depth.
User reviews highlight a stark contrast: BOCS offers no available ratings or recent feedback, making usability difficult to assess. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a 4.63/5 rating for ease of use, with many reviewers describing it as intuitive, easy to learn, and quick to adopt.
Reviewers appreciate the comprehensive training materials and the straightforward interface, which reduces staff onboarding time. Multiple comments mention how quickly new team members can become proficient with Shiji, saving your hotel time and resources.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BOCS provides no detailed feature list, which makes comparison impossible. Meanwhile, Shiji boasts 98 distinct features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, guest messaging, integrated CRS, payment processing, and advanced automation tools.
Many features exclusive to Shiji, such as digital registration, automated reminders, guest CRM, and a booking engine, directly support hotel operations. Its integrated modules and automation capabilities help streamline daily tasks and enhance guest satisfaction.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for BOCS support, indicating a lack of current customer feedback or active support channels. Conversely, Shiji receives a solid 4.53/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with many users praising its responsiveness and professionalism.
Review quotes mention “support team always available 24/7,” and “helpful and proactive,” which are critical for resolving issues swiftly and maintaining smooth operations. Reliable support is essential, especially when implementing or troubleshooting complex hotel systems.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BOCS has no verified integrations listed, severely limiting its ability to connect with other systems. Shiji, however, offers 64 verified partners, including major booking engines, revenue management, and POS systems like SiteMinder, Revinate, Duetto, and Amadeus.
This extensive integration network allows your hotel to create a connected ecosystem, reducing manual work and data silos. The ability to unify revenue, marketing, and operations systems makes Shiji a more flexible choice for modern hotel management.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
With no recent reviews or ratings available for BOCS, it is impossible to determine user satisfaction. Conversely, Shiji has a 90% likelihood to recommend rating, supported by 32 reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness, feature richness, and support quality.
Reviewers from diverse hotel segments, including luxury hotels and boutique properties, consistently rate Shiji highly, reflecting broad satisfaction. Its recent reviews confirm that hoteliers find it reliable and easy to operate, which translates into better daily performance.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
BOCS does not list any pricing information, which suggests it may operate on a custom or enterprise basis. Shiji’s pricing starts at $1,200 per month, with no mention of a trial or freemium options.
While the cost might seem high compared to some solutions, Shiji’s extensive features and support justify the investment for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable PMS. The lack of transparent pricing for BOCS makes it difficult to assess value.
BOCS is best suited for property or asset management firms rather than traditional hotels. Its focus on real estate operations makes it less relevant for hotel-specific needs.
Shiji is ideal for hotels ready to adopt a modern, feature-rich platform that enhances guest experiences and reduces manual work.
The core difference is that Shiji Daylight PMS is designed specifically for hospitality, with a proven track record, extensive features, and active user feedback. BOCS is a property management system focused on real estate management, not tailored for hotel operations.
If you need a hotel-focused system with detailed guest management, automation, and integrations, go with Shiji. Its high review scores, recent activity, and feature set make it the clear choice.
Choose BOCS only if your hotel’s primary needs are property management outside of traditional hospitality functions. For most hoteliers, Shiji offers a more complete and reliable solution.
Final Takeaway:
For hotels seeking a modern, scalable, and highly-rated PMS, Shiji Daylight PMS is the superior choice, especially given its active user base, recent reviews, and broad feature set. BOCS, while possibly suitable for property management outside of hospitality, lacks recent support, reviews, and integrations that are critical for hotel operations today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor