The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bokun shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Bokun users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Bokun |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Bokun by Bokun and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities and scale. Bokun primarily targets tour operators, travel agencies, and activity providers, with a focus on booking management and revenue optimization. In contrast, Infor HMS is a full-featured property management system built for larger hotels that need seamless operational integration and guest experience enhancements. Both address core PMS functions but serve very different hotel segments. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Bokun offers a straightforward booking platform, excelling in managing tours and activity reservations, with a focus on automation and API integrations. It’s designed for propelling travel-related bookings and streamlining customer communications, making it ideal for small to medium-sized operators in the activities and experience sector.
Infor HMS, however, is a comprehensive hotel management suite with core modules covering reservations, housekeeping, billing, and revenue management, tailored for larger hotels or chains. Its strength lies in operational efficiency, deep integrations with other hotel systems, and extensive reporting capabilities.
While Bokun's recent reviews are nonexistent—indicating limited recent user data—Infor HMS boasts over 46 reviews last reviewed six months ago, with a high overall rating of 4.04/5 and a customer support score of 4.04/5. Are you looking for a dedicated booking tool or an integrated PMS? That decision should guide your choice.
If your hotel needs a platform primarily for managing activity bookings, tours, or experiences, Bokun is the clear choice. Its focus on travel distribution, real-time availability, and automation makes it suitable for tour operators or hotels with a significant experience component.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a full property management system capable of handling reservations, guest profiles, billing, housekeeping, and revenue, Infor HMS is the better fit. It’s designed for hotels seeking operational control, customizable reporting, and integration with revenue and accounting systems.
For independent hotels or small chains wanting simple, activity-based booking, Bokun provides a focused solution. Larger hotels or multi-property brands needing robust operational features should lean toward Infor HMS.
Bokun’s interface is designed for ease of booking management, with a user-friendly dashboard and straightforward product setup, though its review count and recent feedback are limited. Its onboarding experience, based on older reviews, was described as simple, with minimal support needed for small-scale operations.
Infor HMS has a more mature user experience, rated 3.88/5 for ease of use across its reviews. Users find it generally intuitive but note that its complex feature set can require training, especially when onboarding new staff. Support from Infor is highly rated, making implementation smoother.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bokun offers no additional features beyond its core booking management capabilities, focusing on reservations, real-time updates, and API integrations. Its platform simplifies managing inventory and automating customer communications but lacks modules like housekeeping, billing, or revenue management.
Infor HMS boasts over 20 features, including housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, centralized role management, mobile app, multi-currency handling, payment processing, revenue management, automated night audits, and more. These features enable operational control across multiple departments.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bokun provides no recent customer support ratings, limiting insight into its support quality. Its older reviews don’t highlight major issues, but the lack of recent data suggests limited ongoing engagement.
Infor HMS’s support receives a 4.04/5 rating and positive feedback for responsiveness and professionalism, with many reviewers appreciating the guidance during onboarding and problem resolution. Its support team is considered a key component of its value.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Bokun has no verified integration partners, which limits its connectivity to external systems. Its strengths lie in API capabilities for booking channels but lacks broad off-the-shelf integrations.
Infor HMS offers 113 verified partners, including major booking engines, revenue systems, and business intelligence tools like Booking.com, Trevo, Fairmas, and Birchstreet. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies connecting your PMS with other operational tools.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Given the lack of recent reviews for Bokun, we cannot determine current user satisfaction. Infor HMS, with 46 reviews, holds an overall rating of 4.04/5, with high marks from hotels in various segments, notably independent (2.5/5, few reviews) and branded hotels (4.5/5).
Large hotels and chains, especially those in North America and Europe, generally rate Infor higher due to its extensive feature set and support. Smaller hotels or experience providers might find Bokun’s niche focus adequate but lack recent data for a definitive comparison.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing information for Bokun isn’t publicly available, as it often depends on specific business needs, and no trial or flat-rate data exists. Typically, Bokun charges a commission or per-transaction fee for bookings, common in tour booking platforms.
Infor HMS’s pricing is also not openly listed but is generally offered via custom quotes based on property size and feature needs. It’s likely more expensive but includes a broad suite of modules and integrations.
In both cases, expect pricing to be tailored, with no transparent flat-rate options. Your hotel should request a quote to determine the actual costs.
Not ideal if your hotel needs full property management, billing, or revenue modules, or if you require advanced operational controls beyond booking.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique or bed & breakfast that only needs basic booking capabilities, or if aesthetic simplicity is a priority.
The core difference is that Bokun is a niche booking platform optimized for activity and experience providers, while Infor HMS is an all-encompassing property management system for larger hotels. If your hotel focuses on tours or experiences, Bokun’s simplicity and API flexibility make it a logical choice. However, if your hotel needs comprehensive operational control, automation, and integration, Infor HMS is the more suitable option.
Choose Bokun if you want a straightforward booking platform tailored for travel activities with minimal complexity. Opt for Infor HMS if your hotel requires a full-featured PMS with extensive modules, integrations, and support to manage a multi-department operation smoothly.
In summary, your decision should center on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and specific needs: for operational mastery, go with Infor HMS; for experience booking, Bokun is the better fit.
According to HTR's product database, Bokun and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bokun and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bokun offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bokun: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bokun has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor