The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 208 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyComp shines .
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 208 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 208 |
After analyzing 208 verified reviews, MyComp users most value its , while eviivo users highlight responsive customer support, onboarding expertise, technical efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding Expertise
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking and Reservation Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Improvement Suggestions
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Feature Development
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 54 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #23 23 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #20 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #18 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #19 41 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #16 38 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #19 21 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #10 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #15 39 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 142 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #33 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #29 1 reviews |
Choosing between Booking Engine CRS by MyComp and eviivo Suite™ PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline reservation management, but they diverge sharply in their scope, user feedback, and regional presence. MyComp’s offering appears narrowly focused on booking engine functionalities, while eviivo provides a full property management suite with extensive features. Which solution will better support your hotel’s growth and operational efficiency?
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp is designed as a central reservation system that handles reservations, dynamic pricing, and inventory control. However, it lacks a broad feature set and has no customer reviews or recent data, making its real-world efficacy uncertain. Conversely, eviivo Suite™ PMS has a proven track record with over 191 reviews, 20 of which are recent, boasting a 4.43/5 ease of use rating and a 4.42/5 customer support score. Its extensive functionalities support various property types across regions, backed by positive recent feedback. Do you want a narrowly focused booking engine or a comprehensive property management platform?
If your hotel requires a simple, integrated booking engine that easily connects to existing tools without extensive features, MyComp’s solution might seem appealing. But given the absence of recent reviews, support details, or regional presence, its reliability remains questionable. Conversely, eviivo Suite™ caters to a broad range of property types—from B&Bs to vacation rentals—with a well-documented, globally trusted platform. If you need real-time synchronization, guest communication, and a proven support network, eviivo is the stronger choice. For high-growth, multi-property management, eviivo's extensive feature set and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader.
From available data, MyComp’s interface and onboarding experience are unreviewed, leaving its ease of use uncertain. eviivo Suite™, on the other hand, scores a 4.43/5 in ease of use, based on over 191 reviews, many praising its intuitive design and helpful onboarding. Recent reviews highlight how users find eviivo’s platform straightforward and mobile-friendly, with support staff guiding smooth implementation. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
MyComp offers no additional features beyond reservation management, making its scope very limited. eviivo Suite™ boasts over 51 features, including channel management, revenue tools, guest CRM, automated messaging, online check-in/out, group management, and mobile apps. These functionalities are regularly praised for streamlining operations and increasing revenue. Given the extensive feature count and user praise, eviivo's platform provides a significantly richer toolkit. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
MyComp’s support details are non-existent, which raises questions about service quality. eviivo, however, consistently receives high marks—4.42/5 in recent reviews—with customers applauding their responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Multiple reviews mention quick, helpful support during setup and ongoing use, critical for property management success. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
MyComp reports zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems and booking channels. Conversely, eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners—including Expedia, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and Google Hotel Ads—allowing seamless distribution and management. This extensive integration network empowers hoteliers to expand their reach easily. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
With no recent reviews or user ratings available for MyComp, assessing hotel satisfaction isn’t possible. eviivo, by contrast, has over 191 reviews, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and excellent ratings in ease of use and support. Hoteliers across segments—from vacation rentals to B&Bs—consistently praise its simplicity and customer service. Recent feedback further affirms eviivo’s strong reputation. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
MyComp’s pricing information is unavailable, suggesting a possible custom quote or lack of transparent pricing. eviivo Suite™ costs $700 monthly, with no free tier or trial offered, which is straightforward but may be a consideration for smaller properties. Budget-conscious hotels should evaluate if the platform’s features justify the investment.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Booking Engine CRS by MyComp offers a reservation-focused tool with minimal features, limited support, and no recent user feedback, making it risky for most hotels. Its core value might appeal to properties seeking a simple, standalone booking engine, but the lack of recent reviews and integrations weakens confidence.
eviivo Suite™, by contrast, is a proven, well-supported platform with extensive features, integrations, and a global presence, backed by recent strong ratings and thousands of satisfied users. It’s suitable for hotels aiming to scale, automate, and streamline operations across multiple properties.
If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with a broad feature set, eviivo remains the clear choice. For a basic reservation engine and regional, low-complexity needs, MyComp might suffice—but only if you’re willing to accept the risks associated with limited recent data.
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine CRS and eviivo Suite™ PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
What hoteliers love
Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide e... Eviivo's customer support is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and efficiency. Support staff, such as Mr. Guetif, Joseph, and Xavier, provide exemplary assistance, which is crucial during the onboarding phase and when issues arise, enhancing overall user experience.
The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integrat... The platform offers expertise during the onboarding process, helping hotels integrate the system seamlessly. This guidance ensures consistent integration of information and optimal use of the PMS features, enhancing property management efficiency.
Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves o... Eviivo is recognized for its technical efficiency, enabling users to complete tasks faster and with fewer errors. This reduces downtime and improves operational workflow, ensuring a smooth experience for hotel management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optim... Some users suggest improvements, particularly in expanding features such as mobile app development and more concrete daily usage tips to further optimize business operations and leverage the platform’s capabilities.
While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further... While users are generally satisfied, there are requests for more customization options, including web and mobile app enhancements, which would further suit specific operational needs and provide additional value.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine CRS and eviivo Suite™ PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine CRS offers 0 verified integration partners, while eviivo Suite™ PMS offers 32. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ PMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine CRS: No. eviivo Suite™ PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyComp has an HT Score of 0 and eviivo has 87. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor