The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyComp shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, MyComp users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities. Both aim to streamline reservation and property management processes but diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your team needs clarity on which product aligns with your current needs and future growth plans.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS offers a centralized reservation platform, primarily focusing on booking automation and revenue optimization. Conversely, Infor HMS provides a full-scale property management system with extensive operational modules, including housekeeping, revenue management, and guest profiles. Which solution best addresses your hotel’s core challenges?
Both products target hotel operations but serve different core functions. MyComp’s CRS centers on reservations, pricing, and availability management, making it ideal if your main goal is booking efficiency and revenue uplift. Infor HMS covers broader operational needs, including front desk, housekeeping, billing, and guest management, suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive management suite.
While MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS lacks detailed reviews and recent user feedback, Infor’s system benefits from a high review count (46 reviews) and recent feedback, making its strengths more evident. The key question: are you prioritizing reservation automation or full-property management?
User ratings reveal a stark contrast: MyComp scores 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews or positive user feedback, suggesting a potentially outdated or less intuitive interface. In contrast, Infor HMS earns a 3.88/5 rating, with users praising its straightforward navigation, quick onboarding, and mobility features.
Infor’s support team is also highlighted for responsiveness, which enhances usability during onboarding and daily operation. The lack of recent reviews for MyComp indicates difficulty in assessing its ease of use, but the absence of positive feedback suggests it may require more effort to adopt.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 features exclusive to its platform, including a housekeeping module, guest profiles, online support, mobile app, revenue management, automated night audit, and multi-currency handling. These enhancements support operational efficiency and guest engagement.
MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS offers no unique features beyond reservation management, emphasizing automation and dynamic pricing. The feature gap is significant, with Infor providing a richer set of tools that foster operational control and customer personalization.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor’s support ratings are notably higher, with a 4.04/5 score and positive review quotes emphasizing prompt, professional assistance. Hoteliers appreciate their responsiveness, especially during system updates and troubleshooting.
MyComp’s support record is unclear, with no recent reviews or ratings available, making Infor’s support performance the more reliable choice. Support quality is critical when integrating complex systems or managing operational disruptions.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor’s system integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, providing extensive connectivity. MyComp has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems.
This large integration network enhances operational flexibility, data synchronization, and revenue management. If seamless connectivity with third-party services is essential, Infor’s extensive partner ecosystem is the clear winner.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 reviews and recent feedback, Infor HMS’s overall rating of 4.04/5 reflects strong user satisfaction, especially among larger hotels and brands. Smaller properties or independent hotels may find its comprehensive features more applicable.
MyComp lacks recent reviews and a measurable rating, making it difficult to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Infor’s reviews, hoteliers seem more confident in its performance.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not specify explicit pricing models or implementation fees. They are likely custom-priced based on the hotel’s size and needs, which is typical for enterprise hotel management solutions.
Since no clear pricing data is available, your decision should focus on feature fit and support quality rather than cost at this stage.
The core difference is scope: Infor HMS functions as a full hotel management system, while Booking Engine CRS focuses sharply on reservations and revenue. If your hotel needs a broad operational platform, Infor offers a richer set of features and stronger recent reviews.
Choose MyComp’s CRS if your priority is optimizing reservations and dynamic pricing, especially if you already have a PMS in place and only need a booking engine.
Infor HMS is better suited for hotels that want a scalable, integrated property management solution, especially if support, integrations, and operational modules matter most. Its extensive features and recent positive reviews make it the more reliable choice today.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively investing in operational efficiency and guest experience, Infor HMS emerges as the preferred solution. It offers more recent, positive reviews, better support, and a broader feature set. MyComp’s CRS may work for niche reservation needs but lacks the depth and confidence currently demonstrated by Infor.
Note: This comparison is based on available data, reviews, and recent feedback, emphasizing the importance of current user experiences in selecting your hotel software.
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine CRS and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine CRS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine CRS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine CRS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyComp has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor