The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyComp shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, MyComp users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| MyComp |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) often hinges on the balance of features, ease of use, support, and overall value. Your hotel needs a platform that not only streamlines operations but also scales with your growth. While MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS promises significant automation and reservation management, RMS has established itself as a comprehensive, multi-functional platform trusted by thousands worldwide. Which software truly fits your hotel’s unique needs?
Both MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS and RMS aim to centralize reservations, streamline operations, and boost revenue. MyComp’s offering focuses on integrating booking processes directly into your existing systems, emphasizing automation and real-time reporting. RMS, on the other hand, provides a broad suite of features including reservations, housekeeping, channel management, and guest communication—making it a full property management tool. Given RMS’s high review count and recent positive feedback, it’s evident that it’s more established and trusted. Do you prioritize a dedicated booking engine or a full operational suite?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, reliable booking engine that integrates seamlessly with your existing website, MyComp could be appealing. It aims to automate reservation workflows, increase booking accuracy, and reduce manual effort. However, if your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system capable of handling reservations, housekeeping, revenue management, and guest relations in a single platform, RMS is the clear choice. RMS supports complex operations and has a proven track record, especially for properties seeking scalability. Which core need aligns better with your current priorities?
RMS’s user reviews consistently rate its ease of use highly, with a 4.28/5 rating and recent feedback praising its intuitive interface. Support staff is praised for their helpfulness and prompt responses, contributing to smoother onboarding. MyComp, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge user experience or adoption success. RMS’s larger review base and recent positive feedback strongly suggest it’s more user-friendly. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers an extensive suite of 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, group functionality, housekeepings, and more—covering virtually every aspect of hotel operations. MyComp provides only a booking engine, with no additional features listed, limiting its scope to reservations alone. RMS’s broad feature set makes it the more versatile choice. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support ratings are high, with a 4.48/5 score, and recent reviews applaud its quick, knowledgeable assistance—highlighting a proactive approach. Conversely, MyComp has no recent reviews or rating data, which raises questions about support quality or recent performance. RMS’s established support reputation makes it the safer pick. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment providers, and other industry tools. It supports Criton, Sage, Fairmas, and many others, giving you flexibility and connectivity. MyComp, in contrast, has no verified integration partners listed, limiting your hotel’s ability to connect with other systems. RMS’s extensive integration network makes it the clear leader. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating is 4.56/5, with recent reviews praising its scalability, ease of managing online bookings, and customer support. Its user base across various segments, especially motels and boutique hotels, has provided recent, positive feedback. MyComp has no reviews or ratings, so its reputation remains unverified. RMS’s recent review activity and high ratings signify a more trusted solution. Edge: RMS.
MyComp does not list pricing, suggesting it may be custom or unavailable publicly. RMS charges $800 per month, with no free tier or trial, which is typical for its feature-rich platform. While RMS’s fee might seem high, it reflects its comprehensive capabilities, unlike MyComp’s more limited offering. Cost should align with your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans.
RMS stands out as a full-featured, well-reviewed platform trusted by thousands globally. Its broad capabilities support growth, complex operations, and seamless integrations, making it suitable for hotels aiming for operational excellence. MyComp’s Booking Engine CRS, while potentially effective for simple reservation needs, lacks the extensive features and recent user feedback to compete at RMS’s level.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive systems approach, RMS’s proven track record and high recent reviews make it the clear choice. For hotels only focused on improving online bookings with minimal operational complexity, MyComp might suffice—but it’s a less proven option.
In summary, opt for RMS if your hotel seeks scalability, extensive features, and strong support. Choose MyComp only if your needs are straightforward and limited to a booking engine. Ultimately, RMS’s recent review activity and higher ratings make it the safer, more reliable investment for ambitious hotels.
According to HTR's product database, Booking Engine CRS and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | MyComp |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Booking Engine CRS and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Booking Engine CRS offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Booking Engine CRS: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyComp has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor