The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 312 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Net Affinity shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Myghs shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 312 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 312 | 0 |
After analyzing 312 verified reviews, Net Affinity users most value its user-friendly booking engine, proactive account management, technical issues and support, while Myghs users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Myghs |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
+
Proactive Account Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Issues and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvements
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
CMS Challenges
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 98 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 178 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #12 12 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 131 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 146 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 92 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #15 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 287 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #17 7 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Net Affinity and Myghs for your hotel’s booking engine hinges on what your property needs most. Net Affinity offers a feature-rich, highly-rated platform with a proven track record of increasing direct bookings, while Myghs, although less reviewed, focuses on revenue management and financial insights. Your decision should align with whether you prioritize a seamless booking experience or broader revenue optimization.
Net Affinity is the dominant choice in the market, boasting over 220 reviews and consistently high ratings, especially in recent months. Myghs, with no recent reviews or extensive user feedback, remains a less proven option. So, which platform will truly serve your hotel’s growth?
Net Affinity and Myghs serve different core functions—booking versus revenue management. Net Affinity’s platform emphasizes a fast, mobile-optimized booking engine with extensive integrations, designed to boost direct bookings through a user-friendly interface. Myghs, on the other hand, is a financial analytics tool, more suited for hotels seeking detailed revenue insights and dynamic pricing advice.
Net Affinity’s strengths lie in features like multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and booking abandonment recapture, which directly impact conversion rates. Myghs excels in consolidating data for strategic revenue decisions but lacks the booking engine functionalities that hoteliers find crucial for direct sales. Do you need a booking engine, or are revenue insights your priority?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine that increases direct reservations and integrates seamlessly with your existing systems, go with Net Affinity. It’s especially suitable for hotels looking to improve mobile booking experiences and digital marketing efforts. If your focus is on optimizing revenue through advanced analytics and pricing strategies, Myghs might appeal—although its lack of recent reviews makes it less tested in the hotel space.
For hotels that want a well-established platform with proven conversion and customer support, Net Affinity clearly outperforms. Meanwhile, if you are primarily interested in revenue management and financial data, and are comfortable exploring less proven options, Myghs could be considered. But given the available data, Net Affinity is the safer, more comprehensive choice.
Net Affinity scores 4.59 out of 5 in ease of use, thanks to its intuitive, mobile-optimized interface praised in many reviews. Users highlight straightforward navigation, quick onboarding, and responsive customer support that make adoption smooth, even for less tech-savvy staff. Conversely, Myghs has no published ratings or reviews, which leaves its user experience uncertain.
Given the detailed feedback, your team will likely find Net Affinity’s platform more accessible and easier to implement effectively. Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity offers 45 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, wedding and corporate modules, booking abandonment recapture, gift vouchers, A/B testing, and more—features crucial for modern hotels. Myghs, with no additional features listed, does not provide the same breadth of booking or marketing functionalities.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive booking platform with advanced options like flexible rates, special offers, and integrated digital marketing, Net Affinity clearly leads. Myghs’s focus on revenue management is a narrower use case. Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s support scores a notable 4.79 out of 5, with many reviews praising their responsive, knowledgeable team and proactive account management. Clients describe their support as “excellent,” with quick issue resolution and ongoing strategic guidance. Myghs has no recent reviews or publicly available data on support quality.
For your team’s peace of mind, Net Affinity’s support reputation makes it the more dependable choice. Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity has verified partnerships with 62 vendors, including major PMS and channel management tools, facilitating smoother system connectivity. Myghs has no documented integrations, limiting its interoperability with other hotel systems.
For hotels seeking a platform that can connect seamlessly with existing tech stacks, Net Affinity is the clear winner. Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s overall rating is an impressive 4.82 out of 5, based on 223 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and impact on revenue. Hoteliers in various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, rate it near 4.9. Myghs has no reviews, making it impossible to compare user satisfaction.
Given the consistent, positive feedback, Net Affinity stands out as the preferred platform. Edge: Net Affinity.
Net Affinity’s pricing starts at $800 per month, with no free tier or trial offered. It requires a clear financial commitment upfront, which might be a consideration for smaller hotels. Myghs does not list specific pricing, so cost remains uncertain, but the lack of transparent pricing can be a deterrent.
Your hotel should weigh the proven value of Net Affinity against the uncertainty of Myghs’s costs. Edge: Net Affinity, due to its transparent pricing and proven ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small with a limited budget or requires only basic booking functionality. Also, if you need a simple, no-cost solution, Net Affinity’s pricing may be prohibitive.
Not ideal if you need a robust booking engine or marketing features. Smaller hotels without dedicated revenue teams may find Myghs’s focus less actionable.
Net Affinity offers a proven, feature-rich booking engine that drives direct bookings and optimizes online presence. Its high review count and recent feedback underscore its reliability and effectiveness, making it a strong choice for most hotels.
If your goal is to improve the guest booking experience with solid integrations, advanced marketing, and excellent support, choose Net Affinity. Its extensive features and market presence make it the clear leader.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s priority is revenue analytics, trend analysis, and pricing strategy, and you are willing to explore an unreviewed platform, Myghs might be worth considering. However, the lack of recent feedback and proven hotel-specific features makes it a less dependable choice currently.
Overall, for hotels seeking a comprehensive, proven booking engine that boosts direct reservations and enhances guest experience, Net Affinity is the recommended platform. It combines strong functionality, excellent support, and a substantial user base to back its performance.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Myghs | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Net Affinity (Booking Engine) and Myghs share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Myghs |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Urgency messaging | ||
| Wedding & corporate booking modules |
Showing top differences. 33 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I am very happy with the collaborative relationship we have with Net Affinity and the results we have seen together. There reporting on both marketing and e-commerce give us great..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users commend the Netaffinity booking engine for its simplicity, ease of use, and effectiveness in increasing direct bookings. It allows for crea... Many users commend the Netaffinity booking engine for its simplicity, ease of use, and effectiveness in increasing direct bookings. It allows for creating and editing rates and packages effortlessly. However, some users mention a steep learning curve and the potential for improvement in search functionalities and link integration.
Many reviews highlight the proactive and supportive role of Netaffinity account managers. They are commended for their timely assistance, constructive... Many reviews highlight the proactive and supportive role of Netaffinity account managers. They are commended for their timely assistance, constructive feedback, and personalized support, which users find instrumental in improving their online performance. Regular communication and detailed monthly reviews are appreciated.
Some reviews mention occasional technical issues with the booking engine and other functionalities. However, users also highlight the quick and effici... Some reviews mention occasional technical issues with the booking engine and other functionalities. However, users also highlight the quick and efficient support provided by Netaffinity's technical team in resolving these issues. Suggestions for improvement include preemptive notifications of issues and better support documentation.
Where hoteliers push back
While many find Netaffinity's CMS user-friendly once accustomed, there are complaints about its initial complexity and functionality. Users suggest im... While many find Netaffinity's CMS user-friendly once accustomed, there are complaints about its initial complexity and functionality. Users suggest improvements in navigation, content management, and the overall intuitiveness of the system. Regular system updates and better training materials are often recommended.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) and Myghs share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) offers 62 verified integration partners, while Myghs offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Net Affinity (Booking Engine) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Net Affinity (Booking Engine): No. Myghs: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Net Affinity has an HT Score of 42 and Myghs has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor