The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bookinglayer shines , with exclusive features like Online Check-in and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Bookinglayer users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Bookinglayer by Bookinglayer and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently—Bookinglayer focuses on bookings for combined activity and accommodation offerings, while Infor HMS emphasizes comprehensive operational control for larger properties. Your decision should reflect whether your hotel benefits more from an all-in-one booking platform or a robust, integrated PMS.
Bookinglayer offers a straightforward, all-in-one booking solution suited for activity-based businesses, whereas Infor provides a feature-rich PMS designed for scalability and complex operations. Which system aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans?
Bookinglayer specializes in booking management for businesses that combine activities and accommodations, offering features like customizable packages, online check-in, and guest communication tools. Infor HMS, in contrast, provides a full property management system with modules for revenue management, housekeeping, and advanced reporting, making it more suitable for larger hotels or chains.
In terms of real-world utility, Infor's 46 recent reviews and higher overall rating (4.04/5) demonstrate stronger market confidence, particularly among hotels seeking operational control. Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks current user feedback and may not be as reliable or well-supported. So, which platform truly meets your hotel’s operational demands?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-deploy, activity-focused booking system with features like gift vouchers and online check-in, Bookinglayer is the logical choice. Its $600 base price makes it an affordable option for small to medium businesses looking for simplicity and integrated booking tools.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires a comprehensive PMS with guest profiles, revenue management, and extensive integrations—especially if you operate in multiple regions—Infor HMS is better suited. Its broad feature set, including automated night audits and CRM capabilities, supports larger, more complex hotel operations.
For small boutique hotels or adventure tour operators, Bookinglayer’s simplicity and activity management features are advantageous. Larger hotels or chains needing detailed operational control and advanced reporting should opt for Infor.
Bookinglayer’s user experience is difficult to evaluate due to the lack of recent reviews, but historically, it’s been designed with an intuitive interface tailored for activity-based bookings. Conversely, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 in ease of use, with positive comments about its straightforward navigation and short onboarding process, despite some reports of interface aesthetics.
More recent feedback favors Infor’s usability, with users appreciating its accessible menus and staff support during setup. Based on current data, Infor’s ease of use edges out Bookinglayer, especially for larger teams needing quick onboarding.
Bookinglayer offers 14 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, digital registration, and online check-in—crucial for activity-focused businesses. Its features are tailored for selling fixed-date trips, packages, and handling guest communications effectively.
Infor HMS, with an additional 14 unique features, excels in operational modules like revenue management, automated night audit, guest CRM, and on-premise options. It supports scalability with extensive reporting, group management, and cloud-based access.
While Bookinglayer’s features are ideal for activity operators and small accommodation providers, Infor’s broad suite caters to larger hotels seeking comprehensive operational control. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize booking flexibility or operational depth.
Bookinglayer’s support ratings are unavailable, but Infor’s scores 4.04/5, with reviews praising quick, professional assistance. Many hoteliers highlight Infor support's responsiveness, especially during critical updates or onboarding, describing it as “prompt and helpful.”
Bookinglayer’s support reputation cannot be confirmed due to no recent reviews, which raises questions about ongoing customer service quality. Given Infor’s consistent positive feedback, support favors Infor, particularly for hotels requiring reliable, ongoing assistance.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including notable partners like Booking.com, Expedia, and Trevo, providing extensive connectivity that simplifies property operations. Bookinglayer, with only 1 verified partner, has limited integration options, primarily with Cloudbeds.
For properties needing a broad ecosystem of connected tools, Infor’s integrations significantly reduce manual work and streamline data flow. Bookinglayer’s limited integrations make it less suitable for hotels reliant on multiple third-party systems.
The latest reviews show Infor HMS’s higher overall score (4.04/5), especially among hotel chains, boutique hotels, and properties in North America and Europe. Hoteliers appreciate its extensive features, support, and operational clarity, despite some complaints about bugs and UI aesthetics.
Bookinglayer’s rating is 0/5 with no recent feedback, indicating no active user base or recent evaluations. Given current review data, Infor’s ratings demonstrate stronger user satisfaction across hotel segments, especially for larger or multi-property operations.
Bookinglayer charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no upfront implementation or trial options, making it straightforward but potentially limiting for larger properties. Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly disclosed, often customized based on hotel size and requirements, typical of enterprise PMS solutions.
Considering the lack of transparent pricing for Infor, your hotel must engage directly for a quote. For small to medium hotels with budget constraints, Bookinglayer’s flat fee offers clarity, while larger operations should expect tailored, possibly higher, costs with Infor.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-region support.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a lightweight, activity-focused booking system or has limited budget for enterprise solutions.
The core difference lies in scope: Bookinglayer offers a simplified, activity-centric booking platform, while Infor provides a full-scale property management system. Your choice should depend on your hotel’s operational complexity and growth trajectory.
If your hotel needs a quick, easy-to-deploy booking solution for activities and small accommodations, Bookinglayer’s affordability and focused features make it the ideal choice.
However, for larger hotels or chains aiming to optimize every aspect—from revenue management to housekeeping and guest relations—Infor HMS’s extensive feature set and proven support make it the better investment.
In conclusion, select Bookinglayer if you prioritize straightforward bookings and activity management. Opt for Infor HMS if you require a comprehensive, scalable PMS capable of supporting complex hotel operations and multiple properties.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Bookinglayer and Infor HMS share 6 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Rate Management |
Showing top differences. 16 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bookinglayer and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Bookinglayer offers 1 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bookinglayer: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bookinglayer has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor