The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,247 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,247 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 1,247 |
After analyzing 1,247 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Cloudbeds users highlight user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 592 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 212 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 42 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #13 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 473 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 228 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #6 116 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 93 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 435 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #7 163 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #3 226 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #7 11 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel aims to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Cloudbeds PMS promise to serve these goals, but they diverge significantly in support, features, and market presence.
Cambridge PMS is a lesser-known, less reviewed platform with no recent user feedback or ratings, whereas Cloudbeds boasts over 1,000 recent reviews, a 4.63/5 overall rating, and a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Do you want a system backed by active user feedback and proven customer satisfaction, or are you comfortable with an obscure solution?
Cambridge PMS claims to streamline hotel operations with a comprehensive platform, but it has no recent reviews, ratings, or verified customer feedback. In contrast, Cloudbeds dominates the market with over 1,070 reviews in the last six months alone, reflecting a highly engaged user base and current performance.
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews praise its ease of use, extensive features, and robust support, while Cambridge’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to gauge real-world performance or customer satisfaction. Are you willing to trust an unreviewed platform, or would you prefer a proven solution with confirmed results?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven user satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It suits properties looking for integrated channel management, booking engines, automation, and extensive third-party integrations, especially if geographic reach and ongoing support matter to you.
If your hotel is a large, complex operation that prefers a less common, potentially customizable solution without recent reviews or proven support, Cambridge PMS might seem appealing. However, due to the stark difference in recent customer feedback, Cloudbeds remains the safer, more reliable option for most hoteliers.
Cloudbeds’ interface wins hands down, with a 4.61/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews praising its intuitive design, straightforward setup, and staff-friendly onboarding. Many users mention how quickly their teams adapt to Cloudbeds, with some saying, “It’s so easy we onboarded staff in days.”
Cambridge PMS has no recent ratings or reviews available. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Given Cloudbeds’ high recent scores, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 64 distinct features, including a channel manager, reservation system, revenue management, guest communication, automated night audits, and integrations with 190 partners. Several users comment on its comprehensive nature, noting, “It’s the only system we need for reservations, billing, and distribution.”
Cambridge PMS provides no detailed feature list and no recent reviews to validate its capabilities. Its limited publicly available information suggests a less extensive feature set. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support is highly rated, with a 4.41/5 support rating and reviews describing it as “responsive,” “helpful,” and “quick to resolve issues.” Customers appreciate the ongoing assistance that keeps their operations running smoothly.
Cambridge PMS has no recent support ratings or customer testimonials, making it impossible to evaluate its responsiveness or quality. Based on current data, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and third-party tools, providing extensive flexibility. Users frequently mention its broad marketplace and ease of connecting new systems.
Cambridge PMS has only one verified partner listed, indicating minimal integration options. For properties that rely on diverse third-party tools, Cloudbeds offers far superior connectivity. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ recent reviews show a 4.63/5 rating, with many property types—boutiques, hostels, vacation rentals—raving about its ease of use, features, and support. Hotels across segments like B&Bs, hostels, and small hotels mostly rate Cloudbeds highly, often citing increased bookings and operational simplicity.
Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews or ratings to compare. Based on available data, Cloudbeds is clearly the preferred choice among active hoteliers. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges $600/month with no setup fee, with no mention of discounts or tiered pricing. Cambridge PMS’s pricing is unavailable, and it offers no free trial or transparent fee structure.
Given Cloudbeds’ transparent, predictable pricing and extensive features, it provides a clear value proposition. The lack of pricing info for Cambridge PMS makes comparison impossible, but market norms favor Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if you need proven reliability, extensive features, or active support. Given the lack of recent reviews, it’s better suited for properties willing to accept higher risk.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a region with unreliable internet, or if you prefer an entirely offline system. Cloudbeds is best suited for properties that want a proven, supported system.
Cloudbeds is a complete, user-friendly platform with proven customer satisfaction, extensive features, and a broad network of integrations. Its active community and recent reviews confirm it’s a trusted choice for hoteliers aiming for growth and operational simplicity.
Cambridge PMS appears to be a less proven, unreviewed system with minimal publicly available information. Without recent customer feedback, its reliability and support remain uncertain, making Cloudbeds the safer, more dependable option.
If your hotel values a platform with current, verified reviews and proven performance, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. It’s ideal for hotels looking to streamline operations, enhance guest experiences, and scale their business confidently.
In summary:
Prioritize your hotel’s growth and operational stability by selecting a platform with demonstrated, recent success—Cloudbeds delivers that reliably.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and Cloudbeds PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and Cloudbeds PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Cloudbeds PMS offers 189. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. Cloudbeds PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Cloudbeds has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor