Campgest vs. RMS:
Which Is Right for You?

The Decision

When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and delivers measurable results. Both Campgest by Campgest and RMS aim to serve this purpose, but they diverge significantly in features, user base, and market presence. Campgest is tailored for campgrounds and outdoor hospitality, while RMS targets a broader hotel and resort audience, including complex multi-property operations. Which system aligns better with your hotel's needs?

Are you looking for a specialized campground management tool or a scalable, feature-rich hotel PMS? Your choice hinges on your property's size, complexity, and operational priorities.

Is Campgest or RMS Better for Hotels?

Campgest is designed specifically for outdoor hospitality venues like campgrounds and RV parks, emphasizing reservation automation, real-time availability, and customer communication. RMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive PMS platform with over 74 unique features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, and revenue management, catering to hotels, resorts, and larger accommodation providers.

While Campgest boasts a solid foundation for outdoor businesses, RMS's extensive feature set and proven scalability make it more suitable for hotels aiming for growth and operational depth. RMS's 293 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.56/5 reflect a mature, widely adopted platform. Campgest's zero reviews and a score of 0/5 suggest it's either new or not well-supported in the hotel segment.

Do these differences impact your decision based on your property's type and growth ambitions?

RMS vs Campgest: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with advanced automation, robust reporting, and extensive integrations, RMS is the clear choice. Its platform supports complex operations like trust accounting, channel management, and guest profiling, making it ideal for hotels with multiple properties or high guest turnover.

If your operation is primarily outdoor-focused, with reservations centered on campsites, RV spots, or outdoor activities, and you prioritize simplicity over a vast feature set, Campgest might initially seem attractive. However, RMS's deeper feature integration—even though it may be more than you need—provides future-proofing for scalability.

Given RMS's large user base, recent reviews, and 90+ HTR score, it's more reliable for hotels seeking a mature, well-supported solution. Campgest's limited info and absence of reviews make it less suitable for hotel-focused operations.

Is Campgest or RMS Easier to Use?

Based on RMS's 4.28/5 ease of use rating and recent positive reviews, it offers a user-friendly interface, straightforward onboarding, and responsive support. Customers highlight that RMS's support team is proactive, knowledgeable, and quick to resolve issues, with reviews noting "no waiting time" and "excellent customer service."

Campgest, with a 0/5 score and no recent reviews, provides no data on usability. Its lack of user feedback suggests it may not be as refined or user-friendly for hotel staff unfamiliar with campground-specific software. Expect a steeper learning curve or limited support.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Features: Campgest or RMS?

RMS offers 74 unique features, including integrated CRS, online support, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, multi-lingual, multi-currency, POS, and automatic night audits. These tools cater to full-scale hotel operations and complex multi-property management.

Campgest, lacking any listed features, appears to be a basic platform primarily focused on reservations and communication for outdoor venues. It does not provide the advanced modules RMS offers, such as revenue management or integrated POS.

If features matter to your operational efficiency and guest engagement, RMS's extensive capabilities give it a distinct advantage.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Campgest or RMS?

RMS's support ratings of 4.48/5 and recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness make it the industry leader. Customers frequently commend the team for quick, effective assistance—"support is proactive and knowledgeable"—and appreciate the availability of online resources.

Campgest's support data is unavailable, and the absence of reviews signifies limited real-world validation. Expect limited assistance or community support if you choose Campgest.

Edge: RMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Campgest or RMS?

RMS outpaces Campgest significantly, with 112 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors, and revenue tools like Criton, Sage, and Unifocus. Such integrations streamline your workflows and reduce manual data entry.

Campgest has no listed integrations, which might hinder your ability to connect with existing systems or third-party services. If seamless connectivity is critical, RMS's extensive partner network makes it the superior option.

Edge: RMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Campgest or RMS?

RMS's 4.56/5 rating, based on 293 recent reviews, indicates strong user satisfaction across diverse hotel segments. Independent hotels, resorts, and branded properties frequently praise its scalability, reliability, and support.

Campgest's zero reviews and a score of zero suggest it is either new or not trusted within the hotel industry. Without recent feedback, RMS is clearly the better-rated and more proven platform.

Edge: RMS.

How Much Do Campgest and RMS Cost?

RMS charges a $800 monthly base fee, with no free tier or trial information available. This fee covers a broad suite of features suitable for larger operations.

Campgest's pricing is unspecified, with no mention of free trials or subscription models, implying it may be a basic or emerging product. Given RMS’s established pricing, budget-conscious small hotels may need to evaluate whether the platform's value justifies the cost.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Campgest?

• Hotels that operate primarily outdoor accommodations like campsites or RV parks.
• Teams seeking a reservation system focused on availability and customer communication.
• Small operations with straightforward booking needs.
• Businesses with minimal need for sophisticated revenue or channel management tools.
• Not ideal if your hotel aims for growth, comprehensive reporting, or multi-property management.

Campgest's simplicity could suit small, outdoor-focused venues but limits scalability and integration potential.

Not ideal if:

• You require extensive automation or revenue management.
• Your operation spans multiple properties.
• Advanced guest profiling or marketing features are priorities.
• You seek a platform with a large support community and documented integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RMS?

• Hotels, resorts, and boutique properties with complex operations.
• Multi-property groups needing centralized management.
• Hoteliers focused on revenue optimization, dynamic pricing, or detailed reporting.
• Businesses seeking extensive integrations with OTAs, POS, and revenue tools.
• Teams that value reliable support and scalable features.

RMS is suited for hotels aiming for growth, operational efficiency, and a seamless guest experience.

Not ideal if:

• Your operation is very small with minimal complexity.
• Budget constraints limit your investment in a comprehensive PMS.
• You prefer a simple, no-frills reservation system without advanced features.
• You’re not ready for the ongoing commitment of a feature-rich platform.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

RMS’s extensive feature set, proven scalability, and high user ratings set it apart. It’s suitable for hotels looking to optimize operations, expand their property portfolio, and deliver enhanced guest experiences.

Campgest, while potentially useful for outdoor venues, lacks the review support, feature depth, and integration capabilities needed for most hotels. Its limited market presence and absence of recent user feedback make it a riskier choice for property management.

If your hotel aims for growth, operational excellence, and guest satisfaction, RMS clearly offers more value and reliability. For small, outdoor-focused venues with minimal needs, Campgest might suffice, but its limitations could restrict future expansion.