The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 66 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Casablanca shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest App and Guest profiles.
Tesipro shines , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 66 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 66 | 0 |
After analyzing 66 verified reviews, Casablanca users most value its support quality, user-friendliness, continuous improvement, while Tesipro users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendliness
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Additional Costs
▾
|
|
|
−
Yield Management and Revenue Optimization
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #21 44 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #34 14 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #42 11 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #36 8 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #37 6 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #33 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #55 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #13 62 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and growth plans. Casablanca and Tesipro both aim to streamline hotel operations but differ significantly in user feedback, features, and market presence. Casablanca leads with a strong reputation, recent reviews, and a broad feature set, while Tesipro appears less established and lacks recent user feedback. Your decision should consider which platform aligns best with your current priorities and future ambitions.
Casablanca dominates in user reviews, boasting over 60 latest reviews with a 4.82/5 customer support rating and a 67.4/100 overall score, reflecting high satisfaction. Tesipro, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its current performance or user satisfaction. Casablanca's comprehensive set of features—such as guest app, guest profiles, native email marketing, and drag-n-drop tapechart—are tailored for hotels seeking robust automation and customization.
Tesipro offers essential PMS features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, and housekeeping modules, but lacks the depth and user feedback that make Casablanca more reliable at this stage. If you prioritize proven performance backed by recent reviews, Casablanca is the clear choice. Are you comfortable with a less tested platform, or do you prefer a solution with validated user satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a highly rated, user-friendly system with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Casablanca. It is ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, or chains that require multi-property management and revenue tools like yield management and automated invoicing.
If your hotel operates at a large scale and values seamless third-party integrations—especially with CRS, payment terminals, and online checkout—and is prepared to navigate a less-reviewed platform, Tesipro could be suitable. Smaller hotels or groups that want a simple setup might consider Tesipro if they find its features sufficient, but the lack of recent feedback warrants caution.
Ultimately, Casablanca’s strong recent reviews and broad feature set make it the safer, more proven option for hotels aiming for operational stability and guest experience enhancement. Tesipro may appeal to larger chains with complex needs, but its untested reputation makes it a riskier choice.
Casablanca’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.8/5, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding process (rated 4.74/5), and straightforward navigation. Support and onboarding are frequently highlighted as strengths, with reviews emphasizing rapid, professional assistance and a smooth learning curve. Many users mention that both staff and management adapt quickly, thanks to its user-friendly design.
Tesipro, by contrast, has no available recent ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Without verified user feedback, it’s challenging to determine how quickly staff can adopt the platform or how intuitive the interface is.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca offers 11 features unique to its platform, such as guest app, guest profiles, native email marketing, and rules-based room assignments. Its total of 29 shared features with Tesipro indicates a comprehensive offering focused on guest communication, revenue management, and automation.
Tesipro provides 15 features exclusive to its platform, including integrated CRS, automated night audit, and online checkout, emphasizing operational automation and integration. However, the feature count alone doesn’t reveal usability or maturity.
Given the higher number of specific features and proven capabilities, Casablanca’s feature set is more mature and aligned with hotel needs for guest engagement and revenue optimization.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.82/5, with numerous reviews highlighting fast, competent, and friendly service. Hoteliers appreciate that support is available even during weekends and holidays, often mentioning the quick response times and effective problem-solving.
Tesipro, with no recent reviews or ratings, leaves support quality unverified. Its absence of recent customer feedback makes it impossible to compare support performance confidently.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca boasts 46 verified integration partners, including major systems like Profitroom, Customer Alliance, and RateBoard GmbH. This extensive connectivity allows hotels to connect with booking engines, revenue management, and financial systems, making it suitable for complex operational setups.
Tesipro has fewer verified integrations, totaling 25, with notable partners like Cendyn and RateGain, but fewer options overall. The smaller integration ecosystem may limit flexibility for some hotels.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s recent reviews show an overall score of 67.4/100, supported by a high NPS score of 9.87/10 and a 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially B&Bs and resorts, praise its support, ease of use, and feature set.
Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Without recent feedback, Casablanca’s proven reputation clearly outshines Tesipro.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca does not publicly disclose its pricing; it offers a custom quote based on hotel size and needs, with no freemium or trial options. Its pricing is likely positioned in the premium segment, given its extensive features and support.
Tesipro charges $1,300 upfront, with no trial or freemium options. The lack of flexibility and no recent review data means you should verify if this cost aligns with your budget and expectations.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget, as some users report higher costs for additional features. Also, smaller boutique hotels with minimal operational needs might find Casablanca’s feature set too comprehensive.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a tested, highly-rated platform with recent user reviews or has limited budgets. Smaller properties or boutique hotels may find Tesipro’s feature set excessive or unproven in current market conditions.
Casablanca stands out as the more established, reviewed, and trusted PMS platform, with a proven track record of high support quality, extensive integrations, and a broad feature set. Its recent reviews and high user satisfaction make it a safe choice for hotels seeking operational stability and guest experience improvements.
Tesipro aims to serve large hotel groups with its integrated, cloud-based solution but lacks recent user feedback and reviews, making its reliability uncertain at this stage. Its lower price point may appeal to hotels with very specific needs or those willing to take a chance on a less proven platform.
If your hotel values proven support, extensive features, and a large user base, Casablanca is the clear winner. If you are a large chain with complex automation needs and are comfortable navigating unreviewed software, Tesipro might be worth exploring further—but proceed with caution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) and Tesipro share 29 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest App | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight Casablanca's exceptional support, noting quick response times and competent, friendly staff. Users appreciate the availability... Many reviews highlight Casablanca's exceptional support, noting quick response times and competent, friendly staff. Users appreciate the availability of support even on weekends and holidays, which has reassured many hoteliers of continuous, reliable assistance.
Reviews consistently commend Casablanca for its easy-to-use and intuitive interface that allows both seasoned and new employees to quickly get up to s... Reviews consistently commend Casablanca for its easy-to-use and intuitive interface that allows both seasoned and new employees to quickly get up to speed. Some users did point out that as the software evolves, it can sometimes become a bit complex for novice users.
Users appreciate that Casablanca is consistently adding new features and improving its usability based on customer feedback. However, some noted that... Users appreciate that Casablanca is consistently adding new features and improving its usability based on customer feedback. However, some noted that they would like more transparency and timelines for when new functionalities will be implemented.
Where hoteliers push back
A common concern among users is the additional costs associated with updates and new interfaces, which can be problematic for smaller hotel operations... A common concern among users is the additional costs associated with updates and new interfaces, which can be problematic for smaller hotel operations. This aspect was cited as a negative, despite the general satisfaction with the software's features.
Many users emphasize Casablanca's tools for yield management and dynamic pricing as essential for increasing revenue. Features like yield prices, grap... Many users emphasize Casablanca's tools for yield management and dynamic pricing as essential for increasing revenue. Features like yield prices, graphical booking routes, and upselling opportunities contribute to better financial performance.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) and Tesipro share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) offers 46 verified integration partners, while Tesipro offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS): No. Tesipro: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Casablanca has an HT Score of 68 and Tesipro has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor