The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Caspeco shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Caspeco users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Deciding between Caspeco PMS by Caspeco and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and regional presence. Caspeco, with no recent reviews and a score of 0/5, appears to lack recent user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Conversely, Infor HMS boasts 46 recent reviews with a 4.04/5 overall rating, signaling more reliable and updated insights into its strengths and weaknesses.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Infor HMS’s extensive feature set and broader market presence suggest a more mature solution. Are you willing to prioritize proven customer satisfaction and recent reviews? Or are you exploring options without current user validation?
Caspeco PMS is marketed as a comprehensive platform that automates reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and billing, primarily targeting small to mid-sized hotels. Its lack of recent reviews and a zero-star score imply that its performance and support might be outdated or unverified, raising questions about reliability. Infor HMS, however, with 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, demonstrates a broad feature set, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for hotels seeking more advanced operational capabilities.
While Caspeco's limited data makes it challenging to gauge, Infor HMS’s ongoing updates and active user feedback indicate a solution capable of handling complex hotel operations. Do you need a solution with validated user experiences and ongoing development?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement PMS with basic operational management, Caspeco could seem appealing. However, the absence of current reviews and features suggests it may lack the robustness or support you require. For hotels that prioritize proven reliability, detailed reporting, and advanced features like revenue management and guest CRM, Infor HMS is the clear choice, given its 46 recent reviews and comprehensive capabilities.
For properties with a focus on regional scalability, extensive integrations, or automation in revenue and guest management, Infor HMS’s broader feature set and market presence make it the more dependable option. If your hotel values recent, verified user feedback, Infor’s current standing offers a decisive advantage.
Caspeco’s user interface and onboarding experience are difficult to evaluate due to its lack of recent reviews and scores, leaving performance and usability unverified. Infor HMS, rated 3.88/5 for ease of use with 46 recent reviews, is generally considered intuitive, especially in navigating operational features like housekeeping and reporting. Its onboarding process is rated 3.64/5, with users appreciating quick setup and support.
Given the current data, Infor HMS’s higher and recent usability ratings suggest your team will find it easier to adopt and train on. Edge: Infor HMS.
Caspeco offers no unique features listed, which suggests a limited or unspecified feature set. In contrast, Infor HMS provides 20 distinct features, including a housekeeping module, guest profiles, online support, multi-currency handling, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features support a full operational toolkit and are regularly updated, enhancing daily management processes.
The significant difference lies in Infor’s ability to support complex needs like revenue tracking and group functionality, which Caspeco does not specify. Edge: Infor HMS.
Caspeco’s support experience cannot be evaluated due to the lack of recent reviews and scores. Infor HMS, rated 4.04/5 for customer support based on recent feedback, is praised for responsiveness, professionalism, and helpfulness. Review quotes mention quick replies and detailed guidance, which are critical when resolving operational issues.
Given the recent review data, Infor’s support team appears more reliable and accessible. Edge: Infor HMS.
Caspeco has no verified partners listed, indicating limited or no publicly available integrations. Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as industry-specific solutions. This extensive integration ecosystem simplifies data management and reduces manual entry.
For hotels relying on multiple systems or requiring seamless third-party integrations, Infor’s ecosystem offers a clear advantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
Caspeco’s review count and ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Infor HMS, with 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, is well-rated across different hotel segments, including independent and branded properties. Property types like boutique hotels (19%) and city center hotels (11%) rate it higher, reflecting its suitability for mid-sized and complex operations.
Without recent data, Caspeco’s performance remains uncertain. Infor’s consistent recent ratings make it the more trusted choice.
Both products do not list specific pricing or subscription models. Caspeco does not offer a trial or transparent pricing, whereas Infor HMS also does not disclose costs publicly, implying a customized quote process.
Your hotel should contact vendors directly for detailed pricing tailored to your property size and needs.
Due to limited recent data, Caspeco may suit simpler, smaller operations with basic operational needs.
Its extensive feature set makes Infor HMS suitable for mid-sized to large hotels and chains.
The core difference lies in the maturity and verification of recent user experience. Infor HMS, with over 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 score, demonstrates consistent performance and feature depth, making it a safer choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability. Caspeco’s lack of recent reviews and zero-star rating cast doubt on its current support and functionality, especially for hotels that need proven solutions.
When to choose Caspeco: If your hotel’s needs are basic, regional, and you can verify support locally, it might suffice. But for most hotels prioritizing recent, detailed feedback and comprehensive features, Infor HMS is the definitive pick.
In conclusion, if you value recent user validation, extensive features, and support for complex operations, Infor HMS is the clear winner.
Choose Caspeco only if your requirements are minimal and you have verified its current performance.
According to HTR's product database, Caspeco PMS and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Caspeco PMS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Caspeco PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Caspeco PMS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Caspeco has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor