The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Caspeco shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Caspeco users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #49 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and bottom line. Caspeco PMS and Redforts are two options that aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they differ greatly in market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. While Caspeco offers a long-standing, integrated solution, Redforts has rapidly gained traction with a broad feature suite and more recent reviews. Which will serve your hotel best?
Both Caspeco and Redforts aim to simplify hotel management by automating reservations, check-ins, billing, and reporting. However, Caspeco’s ratings are nonexistent, with no recent reviews or user feedback, indicating limited current user confidence. Redforts, on the other hand, boasts a high NPS score of 9.5/10 based on 40 recent reviews, with 95% recommending it, demonstrating strong, current customer satisfaction. Do you want a system with proven recent user approval or a less-tested legacy platform?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, highly-rated system with extensive features, go with Redforts. Its 4.68/5 ease of use, 4.53/5 customer support, and strong recent reviews make it suitable for operators seeking reliability and a full suite of functionalities. Caspeco’s lack of current reviews and zero ratings make it difficult to recommend confidently, especially without recent user feedback. If your priority is a proven, well-supported platform, Redforts is the safer choice.
Redforts scores 4.68/5 for ease of use with positive comments about its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and friendly support staff. This rating is reinforced by multiple reviews praising how simple it is to learn and operate, even for small hotels or new staff. Caspeco’s usability is unquantified, and its absence from recent reviews implies no current user experience data. Given the current data, Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers a comprehensive suite with 46 features, including a booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, digital registration, and real-time reporting. Many features that Caspeco lacks, like multi-currency support, automated reminders, and guest messaging, are standard in Redforts. Since Caspeco provides no listed features or recent updates, it's clear Redforts has the edge in functionality. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’s 4.53/5 support rating and recent reviews praising its responsiveness and friendly service suggest strong ongoing support. Hoteliers appreciate their quick query resolutions and continuous improvements. Caspeco’s support scores are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its support quality is questionable. Based on the available data, Edge: Redforts.
Redforts integrates with two verified partners: Mr Winston and WuBook, and offers a full range of modules that connect with booking engines, POS systems, and channel managers. Caspeco’s partner count is zero, indicating limited or no verified integrations currently. The ability to connect with external tools is critical for operational flexibility, so Redforts holds the advantage here. End: Edge: Redforts.
Redforts has a high review score of 72.84/100, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, efficiency, and customer support. In contrast, Caspeco’s ratings are nonexistent, with no recent reviews to gauge current user sentiment. Given the current data, Redforts clearly has the higher hotelier approval. End: Edge: Redforts.
Caspeco does not publicly disclose its pricing, lacking a trial, flat fee, or per-room cost. Redforts charges a $500 base price, with no ongoing fees or trial info specified. While exact comparison is limited, Redforts’s transparent pricing allows for easier budgeting and decision-making. Caspeco’s unknown pricing makes it harder to evaluate value, but current evidence suggests Redforts offers a clear cost structure.
Not ideal if—
Not ideal if—
Caspeco promises a comprehensive property management solution but currently offers no recent reviews or user feedback to back that up. The lack of data suggests it may be more suitable for hotels with existing systems or those willing to invest in custom solutions without recent support validation.
Redforts, with its 40 recent reviews, high ratings, and 95% likelihood to recommend, clearly stands out as the more dependable choice today. Its extensive feature set, strong support, and active market presence make it suitable for most hotels looking to improve operations quickly and reliably.
If your hotel values current, positive user experiences and a full suite of features, Redforts is the recommended platform. Caspeco may have been a contender in the past, but the recent data favors Redforts for your decision today.
According to HTR's product database, Caspeco PMS and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Caspeco PMS and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Caspeco PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Caspeco PMS: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Caspeco has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor