The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CASY Hotel Software shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, CASY Hotel Software users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Casy by CASY Hotel Software and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, feature scope, and market presence. CASY remains largely unreviewed and untested in recent months, while Shiji boasts extensive feedback, a solid reputation, and a comprehensive feature set.
Your decision should focus on which system aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans. Are you prioritizing ease of use, integrations, or cost? Or do you need a system with proven support and a broad regional footprint?
Casy by CASY Hotel Software is an almost completely unreviewed product with no recent feedback, ratings, or known features. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS commands a high review volume, with 32 reviews and a recent NPS score of 8.94/10, indicating strong user satisfaction. Shiji’s extensive feature list (98 features) and widespread integrations showcase a mature, scalable platform, whereas Casy offers no verifiable features or third-party integrations.
Given the ongoing support, recent reviews, and proven market presence, Shiji clearly has the edge for hotels needing a reliable, well-supported PMS. Do you want to risk the untested waters of Casy, or rely on a product with proven performance and a large user base?
If your hotel requires a high-functionality, cloud-native PMS with proven support, extensive integrations, and a broad regional presence, go with Shiji. Its features such as online check-in/out, guest profiles, task management, and integrated CRS make it suitable for mid-sized to large properties or hotel groups aiming for operational consistency.
If your hotel is very small, highly budget-constrained, or needs a simple, unreviewed solution, Casy might seem appealing—though its lack of recent validation makes it risky. For most hotels seeking reliability and scalability, Shiji provides a safer, more comprehensive choice.
Shiji earns a high user rating of 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, training materials, and straightforward task management. Reviewers highlight how quickly new staff can adapt thanks to clear guides and a user-friendly design.
Casy, on the other hand, has no published user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without recent feedback or a demonstrated onboarding process, its ease of use remains uncertain.
Edge: Shiji.
Shiji offers 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRM, payment processing, and more. Many of these are absent in Casy, which provides no verified feature list or unique capabilities.
While Casy’s features are unknown, the breadth and depth of Shiji’s offerings suggest it can meet complex operational needs. For hotels requiring advanced automation, guest personalization, and scalable tools, Shiji clearly outperforms.
Edge: Shiji.
Shiji’s support ratings are high at 4.53/5, with reviewers noting its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful training materials. Support teams are praised for aiding smooth onboarding and troubleshooting, essential for large or multi-property hotels.
Casy’s support quality cannot be evaluated, as there are no recent reviews or ratings available. This lack of data significantly diminishes confidence in its ongoing customer service.
Edge: Shiji.
Shiji boasts 64 verified partners, including prominent systems like SiteMinder, Revinate, Amadeus, Duetto, and others, enabling seamless operation across various hotel tech stacks. Casy has no verified integrations or third-party partnerships listed.
For hotels leveraging multiple systems, Shiji’s extensive integration network provides a key operational advantage. Relying on Casy could limit your connectivity options.
Edge: Shiji.
Considering the latest reviews, Shiji’s overall rating of 4.63/5 and NPS score of 8.94/10 reflect strong satisfaction, especially among luxury and branded hotels. The recent, consistent reviews support its reputation as a reliable, user-friendly system.
Casy has no recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Hotels seeking proven, positive feedback should trust Shiji’s validated performance.
Edge: Shiji.
Casy’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting either a free or custom quote-based model, though this remains speculative. Shiji’s base price is listed at $1,200.00, with no mention of ongoing or hidden costs, but it’s an enterprise-level investment.
Most hotels will find Shiji’s cost justified given its extensive features, support, and proven market presence, whereas Casy’s pricing remains unclear, increasing risk.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for growth, multi-property management, or advanced automation.
Not ideal if your property is very small, highly budget-sensitive, or prefers a simple, minimal system with no need for extensive features.
The core difference is that Shiji is a mature, well-reviewed platform with proven features, support, and global presence. Casy remains largely unverified, with no recent reviews, features, or integrations, making its value uncertain.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable, feature-rich system supported by a strong vendor, choose Shiji. Its broad market presence and positive recent feedback make it the safer, smarter investment.
If your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or needs only a simple solution, Casy might seem appealing—but the lack of validation makes it a risky choice. Without evidence of performance or support, it’s difficult to recommend over a proven alternative.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking to improve operational efficiency, guest experience, and future scalability, Shiji Daylight PMS stands out as the more trustworthy option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Casy and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Casy and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Casy offers 0 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Casy: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CASY Hotel Software has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor