The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 120 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CiHMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
Smart Finder shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 120 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 120 | 0 |
After analyzing 120 verified reviews, CiHMS users most value its operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management, while Smart Finder users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #45 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #20 31 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 43 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 83 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 40 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 15 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #65 0 reviews | — |
| Europe | #58 2 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 117 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #24 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between CiHMS by CiHMS and Soraso by Smart Finder depends on your hotel’s operational needs, regional focus, and feature priorities. CiHMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS with over 100 reviews and recent feedback that underscores its ease of use and support quality, making it a strong candidate for hotels seeking a proven solution. Soraso, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot yet demonstrate reliability or user satisfaction.
Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but CiHMS’s extensive feature set and active user base suggest it’s the more mature, trusted option. Are you ready to dive into which system aligns best with your hotel’s specific requirements?
CiHMS and Soraso address the core challenge of managing hotel operations efficiently. CiHMS’s strengths lie in its advanced automation, multi-channel integration, and detailed reporting, while Soraso’s capabilities remain unverified due to the absence of recent reviews. CiHMS’s proven track record with over 100 reviews, all recent, indicates ongoing development and customer satisfaction, unlike Soraso, which has no recent feedback.
This comparison makes it clear: if your hotel needs a dependable, well-supported PMS with a robust feature set, CiHMS is the safer choice. Can Soraso’s lack of reviews be a concern for your hotel’s operational stability?
If your hotel is looking for a feature-rich property management system that supports large-scale operations, choose CiHMS. Its extensive modules—including revenue management, channel management, integrated CRS, and online booking engine—are designed for hotels that want detailed control and automation.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a simple, perhaps budget-conscious solution with minimal features, Soraso might seem attractive. But with no recent customer feedback or verified integrations, it’s hard to justify over CiHMS, which boasts a clear track record and high user ratings. For hotels requiring reliability and ongoing support, CiHMS clearly leads.
CiHMS’s user rating of 4.9/5 and onboarding score of 4.84/5 reflect a system that's intuitive and supported by strong onboarding processes. Users praise its lean, straightforward interface that supports multiple platforms, making daily tasks smoother. Support experiences are highly rated at 4.92/5, with quick, professional assistance.
Soraso, with no available reviews, cannot demonstrate ease of use or support quality. Its unknown interface and support process make it a risky choice for hotels seeking a user-friendly system.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS offers 33 unique features, including a spa & wellness module, channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, booking engine, automated night audit, and multi-currency support. These features allow your team to automate and optimize many operational areas effortlessly.
Soraso’s feature set remains unverified with no public list of capabilities or unique modules. Without this data, CiHMS’s broad feature coverage and proven functionalities give it a decisive edge.
Edge: CiHMS.
Customer support ratings highlight CiHMS’s strength, with a 4.92/5 score based on user reviews emphasizing professionalism and responsiveness. Reviewers mention timely assistance, comprehensive onboarding, and ongoing support as key benefits.
Since Soraso has no recent reviews or support ratings, it’s impossible to assess its support quality. For hotels prioritizing dependable, responsive support, CiHMS clearly outperforms.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts three verified partners, including SiteMinder, DerbySoft, and Easyway, providing integrations that facilitate distribution and revenue channels. Soraso’s partner list includes two verified integrations, IDeaS and Hoteliers.Guru, but the lack of recent activity diminishes confidence.
Given CiHMS’s broader and more established integration network, your team will likely find it easier to connect with existing hotel systems.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s review count of 101, with recent feedback, and a 98% likelihood to recommend, represent a high level of trust and satisfaction. Its ratings for ease of use, support, and value for money are among the highest in the industry.
Soraso has no recent reviews or scores, meaning it cannot demonstrate proven hoteliers’ satisfaction. Based on available data, CiHMS’s reputation is significantly stronger.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of upfront implementation fees or free trials. The pricing structure indicates a premium, feature-rich system designed for hotels willing to invest in comprehensive management.
Information about Soraso’s pricing is unavailable, making it difficult to compare value. Given CiHMS’s transparent pricing and demonstrated ROI, it likely offers better value for hotels seeking proven solutions.
Not ideal if...
Edge: CiHMS.
Not ideal if...
Edge: CiHMS (due to lack of verified data on Soraso).
CiHMS is a mature, feature-packed property management system with a proven track record, high user satisfaction, and active support. Its extensive modules, integrations, and positive reviews make it ideal for larger or more complex hotels seeking reliable management.
Soraso, lacking recent reviews and detailed features, cannot yet substantiate its value or reliability. It might appeal to very small hotels or those testing systems, but it is not recommended for hotels prioritizing stability, support, or growth.
Choose CiHMS if you value a trusted, comprehensive PMS with ongoing support and proven results. If your hotel’s needs are minimal or experimental, Soraso may be an option—though it carries significant unknowns. In almost all cases, CiHMS is the safer, more validated choice for hotels aiming to optimize operations today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, CiHMS and Soraso share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CiHMS and Soraso share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CiHMS offers 3 verified integration partners, while Soraso offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CiHMS: No. Soraso: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CiHMS has an HT Score of 81 and Smart Finder has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor