The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CitrusPay shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, CitrusPay users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CitrusPay |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CitrusPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CitrusPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CitrusPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel hinges on assessing their capabilities, support, ease of use, and overall fit for your operational needs. Both CitrusPay and Zil Money aim to streamline payment transactions, but their offerings differ significantly. CitrusPay’s absence of recent reviews and low ratings suggest limited market presence, whereas Zil Money’s active and recent user feedback indicates a more reliable choice. So, which platform best supports your hotel’s payment processing needs?
CitrusPay and Zil Money both address hotel payment processing, but they diverge sharply in their market presence and feature sets. CitrusPay’s limited reviews and no recent feedback imply it’s rarely used or supported, while Zil Money boasts 54 reviews in the past six months with an 87% likelihood to recommend, signaling active adoption. Additionally, CitrusPay’s zero ratings across all categories contrast with Zil Money’s high scores in ease of use, support, and value.
CitrusPay’s minimal features and no verified integrations make it less appealing for hotels seeking comprehensive solutions, whereas Zil Money offers 15 distinct features, including multi-currency settlements and contactless payments. Given this context, your choice hinges on recent user data and proven support — Zil Money clearly leads here. Are you prepared to prioritize a platform with recent, positive user feedback?
If your hotel requires a payment platform with a broad feature set, multiple payment options, and active user support, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its 54 recent reviews and high NPS score demonstrate strong, current customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support ratings. For hotels that need reliable, secure, and versatile transaction management—particularly with multiple currencies and contactless options—Zil Money’s offerings align with these needs.
Conversely, CitrusPay’s lack of recent reviews, zero ratings, and minimal features make it unsuitable unless your hotel specifically seeks a very basic or untested solution. If your priority is a trusted, well-supported platform with proven performance, Zil Money is the better option for your team.
Zil Money’s user reviews consistently rate its interface at 4.5 out of 5, praising its intuitiveness and straightforward setup. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.16, and users often highlight how quickly they can start making payments or managing transactions. CitrusPay, on the other hand, has no available ratings or recent reviews, leaving its usability unverified and uncertain.
Given the recent feedback, Zil Money’s interface and support experience are far more predictable and user-friendly. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and payment splitting — features that are crucial for versatile hotel payment operations. CitrusPay, with no unique features listed, lacks the breadth of functionalities needed for modern hotel payment needs.
The availability of multiple payment methods and advanced features in Zil Money make it the clear leader. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s recent reviews rate its customer support at 4.5 out of 5, with users appreciating its responsiveness and reliable assistance. Many reviewers mention that support queries are addressed promptly, contributing to overall satisfaction. CitrusPay, lacking recent reviews and ratings, offers no verifiable support experience, making it a risky choice if support quality is a key concern.
Given current user feedback, Zil Money’s support team provides a more consistent and positive experience. Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money positions itself as a flexible financial platform, with integrations including Yanolja Cloud Solution and various payment methods, although its verified integration count is zero — possibly due to limited partnerships or verification status. CitrusPay’s integration profile is minimal, with only one verified partner, which reduces its adaptability.
Zil Money’s broader range of features and partnerships suggest better integration potential for diverse hotel systems. Edge: Zil Money.
With 54 recent reviews and an 87% likelihood to recommend, Zil Money enjoys high satisfaction across multiple hotel segments, including luxury hotels, boutique hotels, and branded hotels. Conversely, CitrusPay has no reviews or ratings, leaving its hotel user satisfaction impossible to gauge.
Based on current data, Zil Money’s user ratings strongly favor it for hotels looking for dependable payment processing. Edge: Zil Money.
CitrusPay’s pricing details are unavailable, implying it might not have a transparent or widely adopted pricing model. Zil Money charges a base price of $400, with no free tier or trial information listed. The lack of trial options or flexible pricing raises questions about affordability for smaller or budget-conscious hotels.
If cost transparency and flexibility are priorities, Zil Money’s pricing model is clear, but you should factor in the upfront fee. CitrusPay’s pricing remains unclear and potentially less accessible.
Since CitrusPay’s feature set is unlisted and its user data nonexistent, it’s difficult to recommend it definitively. If your hotel requires a basic, minimal setup, and you’re comfortable with unverified support, CitrusPay might suffice.
However, it’s better suited for teams that:
Not ideal if your hotel relies on multi-channel payments, multiple currencies, or detailed analytics.
Hotels that need a flexible, feature-rich payment platform should consider Zil Money. It’s suitable for:
Not ideal if your hotel operates with a very tight budget, as the $400 base fee might be prohibitive for small properties or startups.
Zil Money’s current reviews and active user feedback position it as a reliable, comprehensive payment solution for hotels. Its broad feature set and strong support make it a practical choice for most mid-sized to large properties.
CitrusPay, lacking recent validation, appears to be an untested option—better avoided unless your hotel has specific, minimal requirements and no need for support or advanced features.
If you prioritize proven performance and modern payment options, Zil Money stands out as the clear winner. For basic, unverified needs, CitrusPay might suffice, but it’s not a recommended long-term solution.
According to HTR's product database, CitrusPay and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CitrusPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CitrusPay and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. CitrusPay offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CitrusPay: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CitrusPay has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor