The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 328 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Acigrup shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 328 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 328 | 0 |
After analyzing 328 verified reviews, Clock users most value its feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates, while Acigrup users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 117 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 157 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 165 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 80 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 62 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 27 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 30 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 228 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Clock PMS and Acigrup aim to streamline hotel operations, but Clock's extensive review base and recent positive feedback position it as the more proven solution. Do you want a system with a track record and a comprehensive feature set, or are you exploring less established options?
Clock PMS offers a full suite of integrated tools, while Acigrup’s platform appears limited by its lack of verified reviews and integrations. Your decision should hinge on the product with the most recent, positive user feedback and demonstrated functionality.
Both products are designed to address core hotel management challenges—reservations, rates, invoicing, and guest communication. Clock PMS consolidates these processes into one system, boasting over 250 reviews and a near-perfect 4.8/5 rating, driven by recent, high-quality feedback. Acigrup, with no current reviews or market presence, provides no data to support its effectiveness.
Clock’s recent reviews highlight time savings, operational clarity, and a strong support team, while Acigrup’s lack of feedback leaves its capabilities unverified. Given the volume and recency of Clock’s reviews, it’s the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven results.
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one PMS with extensive integrations, automation, and reliable support, Clock PMS is the clear choice. Its user base spans diverse segments—independent, boutique, city center hotels—with an average rating of 4.83/5 from 198 recent reviews, emphasizing ease of use and efficiency.
Conversely, if your hotel is smaller or prefers a less established platform without documented support or integrations, Acigrup might seem appealing. However, with no reviews or proven track record, it’s difficult to recommend over Clock’s well-documented success. For most hotels, Clock offers tangible, proven benefits.
Clock PMS's user interface is rated 4.78/5, with particular praise for its intuitive design that simplifies staff onboarding and daily operations. Support and onboarding are similarly rated highly at 4.75/5, with many reviewers noting the responsive, helpful team and streamlined training processes.
In contrast, Acigrup’s usability and support ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to assess whether it simplifies hotel operations. Given Clock’s clear, recent positive feedback, it’s the easier system for your team to adopt and master.
Clock PMS offers over 58 unique features, including integrated booking engine, channel management, revenue and group management, guest profiles, digital check-in, and more—covering nearly every aspect of hotel operations. Many of these features are exclusive to Clock, such as automated space optimization, integrated CRS, and guest messaging.
Acigrup’s feature set is not publicly detailed, and with no verified features or reviews, it’s unclear what functionalities it provides. Based on available information, Clock’s feature depth and breadth clearly outpace Acigrup’s, making it the more capable solution for busy-hotels.
Clock PMS’s support team earns a 4.75/5 rating, with recent reviews praising their quick, helpful responses. Hoteliers highlight how responsive support and continuous updates contribute to smoother operations, especially during onboarding.
Acigrup offers no publicly available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality uncertain. With proven, high-rated support and ongoing engagement, Clock is the safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable assistance.
Clock PMS integrates with 111 verified partners, including major tools like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom, enabling seamless connectivity for reservations, payments, and marketing. Its open API and no connection fees foster flexible, scalable integrations.
Acigrup has no verified integrations or partner data, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools. For a hotel needing a PMS that easily interacts with other systems, Clock’s extensive integration network is a decisive advantage.
Clock PMS boasts over 250 recent reviews with an average rating of 4.8/5, and a likelihood to recommend of 95%, indicating high satisfaction across segments—especially independent and boutique hotels. Reviewers praise its ease of use, feature richness, and support.
Acigrup, with no reviews or user feedback, provides no data on customer satisfaction. Given the recent, reliable ratings for Clock, it’s the product hoteliers trust and recommend.
Clock’s base price is $600 per month, with no freemium option or extra implementation fees. Its transparent pricing model makes budgeting straightforward.
Acigrup does not publicly disclose pricing details, which could complicate budgeting and decision-making. The lack of transparent costs favors Clock for hotels seeking predictable investment.
Clock PMS is a mature, feature-rich platform backed by a large user base and recent, positive reviews. Its extensive integration network, ease of use, and proven support make it suitable for most medium to large hotels seeking operational efficiency.
Acigrup’s platform remains unverified due to the absence of reviews and integrations, making it a risky choice for hotels that demand reliability and proven functionality. It may serve smaller properties or those with very limited needs, but with little confidence in performance.
When to choose Clock PMS:
When to choose Acigrup:
In conclusion, Clock PMS’s proven track record and recent positive reviews make it the recommended choice for most hotels aiming for streamlined operations and guest satisfaction.
According to HTR's product database, Clock PMS and Hospitality Software share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Clock PMS and Hospitality Software share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Hospitality Software offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock PMS: No. Hospitality Software: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 84 and Acigrup has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor