The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,340 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Blastness shines in customer support and ROI .
Cloudbeds shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive design — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Centralized user & role management and Unlimited Channels (no additional cost).
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,340 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 85 | 1,255 |
After analyzing 1,340 verified reviews, Blastness users most value its channel management, support and assistance, revenue management, while Cloudbeds users highlight ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
+
Support and Assistance
▾
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
+
Revenue Management
▾
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
+
System Integration
▾
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #11 32 reviews | #3 572 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 48 reviews | #5 171 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #33 0 reviews | #4 42 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #11 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 25 reviews | #2 484 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 36 reviews | #4 213 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #11 18 reviews | #4 108 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 3 reviews | #2 92 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #16 2 reviews | #1 405 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #7 83 reviews | #4 183 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #21 0 reviews | #4 231 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #6 14 reviews |
Choosing between Blastness Channel Manager and Cloudbeds Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both solve the core problem of distributing inventory across OTAs, but they diverge in user experience, features, and overall market presence. Your decision should consider the size of your property, your tech infrastructure, and the level of integration you require.
Blastness aims to optimize online distribution with a focus on revenue management, while Cloudbeds offers a broader, all-in-one platform that handles PMS, booking, and distribution. Are you prioritizing specialized channel control or a unified system?
Blastness focuses exclusively on channel management, offering detailed control over distribution channels and revenue optimization tools. Cloudbeds, by contrast, combines PMS, booking engine, and channel management into one platform, providing a unified experience for staff and managers.
Blastness's strengths lie in its advanced market insights and real-time synchronization, ideal for hotels that want precise control over distribution and pricing strategies. Cloudbeds, with its extensive integrations and broader functionalities, suits hotels looking for a comprehensive management solution that consolidates operations.
Recent reviews favor Cloudbeds, with 74 reviews in the last six months compared to only 18 for Blastness, indicating stronger current user confidence. Given the higher review volume and more recent feedback, Cloudbeds is the more trusted choice at present.
Are you looking for a dedicated channel tool or an all-encompassing property management system?
If your hotel needs a robust, easy-to-use platform that integrates reservations, revenue, and distribution into one system, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its high ratings — a 4.64/5 overall and a 99.8/100 HT score — and over 1,062 reviews, with 74 recent ones, demonstrate broad confidence and reliability.
Conversely, if your focus is on maximizing distribution control specifically and optimizing pricing strategies with detailed market insights, Blastness excels. Its specialized tools and dedicated approach are better suited for properties that prioritize distribution efficiency and revenue management.
Hotels with a diverse portfolio or aiming for rapid scaling should lean toward Cloudbeds for its full-featured ecosystem. Smaller hotels or those with complex revenue strategies might prefer Blastness for its targeted, granular control.
Blastness boasts a high ease of use rating of 4.84/5, with reviews emphasizing the intuitive interface and smooth integration with existing PMS systems. Customers praise its straightforward setup and clear instructions, which help staff adopt the platform quickly.
Cloudbeds, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, is also highly regarded for its user-friendly dashboard and simplified workflows. Users highlight that its design reduces training time and streamlines daily operations across departments.
Edge: Blastness — its slightly higher ease-of-use score and recent review activity point to a more confident user experience, especially for properties that require quick onboarding.
Cloudbeds offers 15 shared features plus 2 unique ones: centralized user & role management and unlimited channels at no extra cost. These functionalities support multi-property management, advanced automation, and seamless integrations with OTAs like Airbnb and Booking.com.
Blastness’s core strength lies in its specialized channel management tools and revenue management systems, with no exclusive features listed beyond its distribution controls. Its features are focused on streamlining distribution and pricing, rather than broader hotel operations.
Given the higher number of features and integrations, Cloudbeds provides a richer, more adaptable platform. Its extensive partner network (190 verified integrations) also offers more flexibility for hotels seeking a scalable tech stack.
Edge: Cloudbeds, due to its broader feature set and extensive integrations, delivers more comprehensive operational support.
Blastness earns a 4.88/5 rating for customer support, with reviews praising quick replies and dedicated, professional assistance. Customers often mention recurring meetings and insights that help optimize their systems, highlighting proactive engagement.
Cloudbeds scores 4.41/5, with some reviews noting responsiveness but also occasional delays during peak periods. Customers appreciate its helpful support, yet some mention that faster resolution times could improve the experience.
Edge: Blastness — its higher support rating and recent positive reviews suggest a more attentive and responsive support team.
Cloudbeds leads significantly with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and service providers, versus Blastness’s 15 verified integrations. Shared partners like Duetto and IDeaS illustrate some overlap, but Cloudbeds’s extensive marketplace enables more customization and scalability.
Blastness’s smaller partner network limits its flexibility for hotels needing diverse or niche integrations. If your hotel relies on a broad array of partners, Cloudbeds’s ecosystem offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds, for its unmatched number of integrations and ecosystem flexibility.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.64/5 and recent reviews in the last six months reflect strong user satisfaction, especially among independent hotels and properties aiming for growth. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and comprehensive features.
Blastness’s ratings are notably lower, with a 0/5 overall score and fewer recent reviews, indicating less current user confidence. Its niche appeal and specialized tools appeal to a smaller, more focused user base.
Edge: Cloudbeds — higher ratings and more recent reviews make it the more trusted choice for most hoteliers today.
Blastness’s pricing details are not publicly available, which can hinder budget planning. Cloudbeds charges a base fee of $200 per month, with no trial or implementation fees listed.
If budget transparency is critical, Cloudbeds’s predictable pricing structure simplifies comparison and decision-making.
Not ideal if you need a full property management suite or a large-scale multi-property platform.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized revenue management tools or if you prefer standalone channel management.
Cloudbeds is the more comprehensive, broadly trusted platform, especially for hotels seeking an integrated property management and distribution system. Its extensive reviews, higher recent activity, and larger ecosystem make it the stronger choice for most.
Blastness, while highly regarded for its specialized distribution and revenue management, has fewer recent reviews and a narrower feature scope. It remains ideal for hotels that need detailed control over their distribution channels and pricing strategies.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a scalable, all-in-one platform that simplifies operations and offers extensive integrations. Opt for Blastness if your focus is on fine-tuning distribution and revenue management within an existing system.
In summary, for most hotels today, Cloudbeds’s reputation, recent performance, and feature breadth make it the clear leader. But if your hotel’s core challenge is channel control and revenue optimization, Blastness still offers a dedicated solution worth considering.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Blastness Channel Manager and Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 11 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
What hoteliers love
The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find... The Blastness Channel Manager is noted for its real-time synchronization, consistent availability and pricing, reducing overbooking risks. Users find it intuitive and crucial for streamlined distribution management across multiple channels.
While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better... While Blastness is commended for its excellent and prompt customer support, a few users suggest extending support hours, including weekends, to better address urgent issues.
Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven... Reviewers highlight the effectiveness of Blastness' Revenue Management System (RMS) in optimizing pricing strategies and forecasting. Its data-driven approach allows for dynamic pricing, enhancing overall profitability.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Blastness Channel Manager and Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Blastness Channel Manager offers 15 verified integration partners, while Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Blastness Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Blastness Channel Manager: No. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Blastness has an HT Score of 78 and Cloudbeds has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor