The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,257 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive design — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Reseliva shines in customer support and ROI .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,257 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1,255 | 2 |
After analyzing 1,257 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and intuitive design, real-time synchronization, all-in-one platform integration, while Reseliva users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive design
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one platform integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and performance issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Website builder limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | #35 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | #40 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | #34 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | #36 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | #30 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | #19 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
Choosing between Cloudbeds’ Channel Manager (myallocator) and Reseliva’s Booking Engine and Channel Manager System hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Both aim to streamline distribution and increase bookings, but they approach these goals differently. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, integrated platform with a vast partner network, whereas Reseliva focuses on providing a straightforward, single-interface solution primarily for rate and availability management. So, which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
Cloudbeds’ platform is built for hotels seeking an all-in-one system that covers reservations, channel management, revenue insights, and more, with a strong emphasis on scalability. Reseliva, by contrast, specializes in simplifying distribution and direct bookings through a user-friendly interface, often appealing to smaller or mid-sized hotels prioritizing ease of use. While Cloudbeds touts a global presence and extensive integrations, Reseliva emphasizes straightforward management of rates and availability. Do you need a broad platform or a focused solution?
If your hotel needs a unified system that combines PMS, booking engine, channel management, and detailed analytics, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its extensive partner ecosystem (190 verified integrations) and support for multi-property and multi-region operations make it ideal for ambitious hotels aiming for rapid growth. Conversely, if your primary goal is to manage rates and availability across channels efficiently with minimal complexity, Reseliva’s simpler, more targeted system may be sufficient, especially if you value a straightforward setup.
Cloudbeds’ intuitive interface scores a 4.6 out of 5, praised for its ease of onboarding and daily navigation, with over 1,062 reviews reflecting strong user satisfaction. Reseliva, slightly behind at 4.5/5, is also noted for its simplicity and straightforward controls, making it suitable for hotels new to channel management. However, with Reseliva’s smaller user base, the community support and evolving features are more limited. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds provides 17 unique features, including an analytics dashboard, centralized user management, unlimited channels at no extra cost, and detailed booking performance reports—none of which Reseliva offers. Reseliva’s core strength lies in its rate and availability management, but it lacks advanced features like comprehensive analytics or role management. If advanced reporting and automation are priorities, Cloudbeds’s broader feature set has the edge.
Cloudbeds’ customer support scores 4.41 out of 5, with many users citing responsive service and helpful onboarding. Some reviews mention room for improvement during peak times, but overall, support is well-regarded for its professionalism. Reseliva boasts a perfect 5/5 support rating from its few reviews, with users praising assistance and quick responses. Yet, the limited review volume makes it harder to gauge consistency. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ extensive ecosystem features 190 verified integrations, including popular partners like AdsHotel, Sirvoy, and HiJiffy, offering extensive customization. Reseliva has only 3 verified partners, which restricts its ability to connect with a wide range of tools or third-party systems. For hotels planning to scale or diversify their tech stacks, Cloudbeds’s integration depth is a significant advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds enjoys a high overall rating of 4.64/5, supported by 1,062 reviews and recent feedback from users across varied segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Its newer reviews (74 in the last six months) reinforce its ongoing relevance and reliability. Reseliva, with only 2 reviews, has no substantial recent feedback to compare. Based on volume and recency, Cloudbeds clearly leads in user approval.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $200 per month with no trial or implementation fees, positioning itself as a cost-effective all-in-one platform. Reseliva’s base price is $300, plus a 30-day trial, with no additional details on ongoing costs. While Cloudbeds’s pricing appears straightforward, its broader feature set justifies its slightly lower starting price.
Not ideal if you operate a very small property with minimal distribution needs or prefer a lightweight, single-focus solution.
Not ideal if you need detailed reports, extensive automation, or multi-region support.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, scalable platform that covers all aspects of hotel management beyond distribution, making it ideal for growth-oriented properties. Its extensive integrations, advanced features, and high user ratings make it the better choice for most hotels aiming to streamline operations and expand.
Reseliva provides a straightforward, rate-centric management system that shines in simplicity and ease of use. It’s suited for smaller properties or those with limited operational complexity, but its narrower feature set and limited integrations make it less suitable for larger or expanding hotels.
If your goal is to grow and diversify, Cloudbeds’s broader capabilities and proven track record position it as the clear winner. However, if you need a quick, easy solution for managing rates across a few channels, Reseliva may meet your immediate needs—though its long-term scalability is limited.
In summary, Cloudbeds’s recent review volume and high satisfaction scores cement its status as the more reliable, versatile choice for ambitious hotels.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage re... The intuitive interface of Cloudbeds is highlighted positively by many users, who find it user-friendly for staff across all levels. This advantage reduces training time and enhances operational consistency, though some users still see room for improvement in advanced feature navigation.
The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory... The platform's real-time synchronization across different channels is highlighted as a critical feature. This provides users with up-to-date inventory management, significantly reducing overbookings. Reviewers emphasize its importance in maintaining consistency across platforms like OTAs and direct bookings.
Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need f... Many users praise Cloudbeds for its seamless integration of PMS, channel management, and booking engine, simplifying operations by reducing the need for multiple systems. This integration helps staff efficiently manage reservations, rates, and guest interactions in a centralized manner, boosting productivity and reducing errors.
Where hoteliers push back
While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been crit... While Cloudbeds supports essential functionalities, its customization options in areas such as website design, messaging, and reporting have been critiqued. Users seek more flexibility and control in tailoring these features to better meet specific business needs and improve guest experiences.
Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productiv... Though the platform generally performs well, some users report occasional speed bottlenecks and lag during peak operations, which can affect productivity. Faster load times and increased system responsiveness during high-traffic periods are desired improvements.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 189 verified integration partners, while Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 99 and Reseliva has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor