The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 293 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in support quality and onboarding — especially for vacation rental properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 293 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 291 | 2 |
After analyzing 293 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its support quality and onboarding, ease of use and workflow efficiency, centralized multi-channel booking management, while Reseliva users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support quality and onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use and workflow efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized multi-channel booking management
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct bookings and SEO
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile app / mobile access limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 80 reviews | #37 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 23 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 4 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 2 reviews | #18 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 48 reviews | #38 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 50 reviews | #37 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 27 reviews | #30 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 29 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 232 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | #19 1 reviews |
| Middle East | #22 2 reviews | #14 1 reviews |
eviivo Suite™ CM and Reseliva both serve as channel managers aiming to synchronize online travel agency (OTA) bookings with hotel availability and rates. They cater to properties needing to avoid overbookings and optimize distribution across multiple platforms. eviivo stands out with its extensive market presence across 27 countries, supporting a wide range of property types with 291 reviews and an overall rating of 4.8/5. Reseliva, with only 2 reviews and a 5/5 rating, currently has limited market penetration and less verified data, making it harder to conclusively assess its fit beyond smaller or newer adopters.
Both products address the core problem of multi-channel reservation management by centralizing bookings and rates in one system to reduce manual errors and increase operational efficiency. eviivo’s proven track record with properties ranging from vacation rentals to luxury hotels contrasts with Reseliva’s smaller footprint and limited review volume. This difference is crucial for hoteliers seeking a reliable, widely adopted solution versus those considering newer or less established options.
If you operate a small to medium-sized independent property, bed and breakfast, or vacation rental in Europe or North America, eviivo is the better choice based on 291 reviews and broad regional adoption. Its integration with 35 verified partners and features like booking performance reporting support properties aiming to grow bookings while maintaining operational control. Properties with multiple units or a need for centralized multi-property management will benefit from eviivo’s demonstrated ability to scale, as evidenced by clients managing up to 36 rooms across several properties.
Conversely, if your hotel is in one of the two countries where Reseliva operates, or if you run a smaller branded or limited-service hotel with fewer than 10 room types, Reseliva may be sufficient. However, the limited number of reviews (2) and lack of recent feedback mean the data supporting Reseliva for larger or more complex operations is thin. Hotels requiring advanced analytics or extensive integrations will find eviivo a more robust solution. Use caution with Reseliva for properties hoping to leverage extensive OTA connectivity or detailed reporting until more data emerges.
eviivo scores 4.6/5 for ease of use and onboarding, supported by 291 reviews with 38 recent ones. Reviewers describe the system as intuitive and time-saving, especially for managing multiple channels from a single calendar. Some mention complexity in settings requiring onboarding but overall praise the platform’s workflow efficiency. Reseliva rates slightly lower with 4.5/5 ease of use and perfect onboarding at 5/5, based on only 2 reviews lacking recent updates. Users highlight its simplicity but note the interface is dated and may struggle with more than 10 room types.
Both products receive similar ease of use ratings; eviivo’s extensive feedback confirms consistent user satisfaction, while Reseliva’s limited data and minor usability concerns suggest potential adoption challenges for larger properties. The difference is marginal with eviivo’s greater user base providing stronger evidence of ease in diverse hotel workflows.
Edge: Even.
eviivo uniquely offers an analytics dashboard and booking performance and pace reporting, features absent in Reseliva. These tools provide hotel managers and revenue teams actionable insights into booking trends and revenue optimization strategies, improving decision-making beyond basic channel management. Both platforms share 13 core features like real-time calendar synchronization and centralized rate management.
Reseliva lacks unique features, limiting its appeal for hotels that prioritize data-driven revenue management. eviivo’s advanced reporting capabilities allow operators to track performance metrics and adjust pricing or marketing efforts accordingly, which is crucial for maximizing revenue and operational efficiency in competitive markets.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM by eviivo.
eviivo has a 4.7/5 customer support rating from 291 reviews, including 38 recent ones, reflecting consistent, responsive service praised for problem resolution and training support during onboarding. Some reviewers note limited weekend support and occasional delays. Reseliva holds a perfect 5/5 support score but is based on only 2 reviews with no recent activity, limiting confidence in the data.
Reviewers of eviivo report a mix of satisfaction and frustration, with 4 of 17 negative reviews citing slow responses and unacknowledged tickets, impacting critical issues like direct booking capture. Reseliva’s limited feedback cannot confirm long-term support consistency. Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s reviews, it offers stronger evidence of reliable customer service.
Edge: Even.
eviivo integrates with 35 verified partners including major OTAs such as Expedia, Tripadvisor, and D-Edge, as well as revenue management and guest communication platforms like RoomPriceGenie and Duve. This extensive connectivity enables hotels to access broad global distribution and advanced ancillary services critical for maximizing occupancy and guest engagement. Reseliva supports 4 partners including Cloudbeds and Pricing Coach but shares no integrations with eviivo. Its smaller integration network limits its ability to connect with diversified sales and marketing tools.
Hotels needing comprehensive channel distribution and third-party service integration will find eviivo’s ecosystem substantially more robust. Reseliva’s narrower integration scope may suffice for smaller properties or those with simpler tech stacks but lacks the breadth to support complex operations or rapid growth.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM by eviivo.
eviivo holds a 4.8/5 overall rating across 291 reviews with 38 in the last six months, where the rating dips slightly to 4.4/5. This indicates recent users remain highly satisfied, though some challenges persist. Reseliva’s 5/5 rating is based on only 2 reviews with no recent data, which limits its representativeness. eviivo’s ratings by hotel segment show consistent high marks across vacation rentals (4.9/5, 107 reviews), bed and breakfasts (4.8/5, 130 reviews), luxury hotels (4.9/5, 51 reviews), and limited service hotels (4.8/5, 43 reviews). Reseliva’s ratings come from very few users across branded hotels and other segments, making comparisons statistically unreliable.
Given the volume and distribution of eviivo’s reviews, its ratings provide a dependable indicator of performance for diverse property types. Reseliva’s current rating profile is insufficient for confident assessment beyond niche or early adopter contexts.
Edge: Even.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 with no room-based fees or implementation charges. There is no free trial or monthly flat fee; pricing is straightforward without add-ons. Reseliva’s base price is $300, significantly lower, with no monthly flat or per-room fees and no implementation fee. Reseliva offers a 30-day free trial, which eviivo does not.
Hotels with tight upfront budgets may prefer Reseliva’s lower base cost and trial period, facilitating risk-free evaluation. Properties prioritizing comprehensive features and integrations might find eviivo’s higher price justified by its broader capabilities and proven ROI as demonstrated in case studies. Pricing transparency favors straightforward budget comparisons, but total cost of ownership will depend on property size and required features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between eviivo Suite™ CM and Reseliva lies in scale and sophistication. eviivo supports a broad range of property types across 27 countries, offering extensive integrations, advanced analytics, and a proven track record with hundreds of reviews. Reseliva, while rated 5/5, has a much smaller market presence, limited integrations, and minimal review data. Both streamline multi-channel booking management but serve different operational scales.
Choose eviivo if your hotel requires robust OTA connectivity, multi-property control, and revenue management insights. Its analytics dashboard and booking pace reports enable data-driven pricing and operational decisions, while 35 integrations support diverse distribution and guest services. eviivo’s extensive user base and recent reviews provide confidence in consistent performance and support.
Choose Reseliva if your property is smaller, operates in one of its limited markets, and prioritizes ease of use with a lower entry cost. Its simple interface and 30-day trial reduce the adoption risk for budget-conscious hotels with straightforward distribution needs. However, its lack of advanced features and integrations limits its suitability for properties targeting growth or complex operations.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $300/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews praise Eviivo’s support team for being responsive, patient, and helpful during setup, activation, and day-to-day use. At the same time, a... Many reviews praise Eviivo’s support team for being responsive, patient, and helpful during setup, activation, and day-to-day use. At the same time, a few users report inconsistent chat quality, slow response times, limited out-of-hours help, or a need for more hands-on training and clearer guidance.
Users frequently describe the platform as simple, intuitive, and time-saving, especially for managing bookings, calendars, and property operations in... Users frequently describe the platform as simple, intuitive, and time-saving, especially for managing bookings, calendars, and property operations in one place. Some also note that certain settings are complex or not always intuitive, so the product appears strongest for teams that want efficiency but may require onboarding to unlock it fully.
Users repeatedly say Eviivo brings reservations from OTAs and direct channels into one place, making it easier to manage multiple properties or agenci... Users repeatedly say Eviivo brings reservations from OTAs and direct channels into one place, making it easier to manage multiple properties or agencies from a single calendar. This centralization saves time, reduces manual work, and gives operators a clearer view of bookings across their distribution network.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate being able to manage reservations remotely, others say the mobile experience is weak, cumbersome, or unreliable compared w... While some users appreciate being able to manage reservations remotely, others say the mobile experience is weak, cumbersome, or unreliable compared with desktop use. This matters for hoteliers who need true on-the-go operations, and several reviews request a fuller mobile app or smoother mobile login and usability.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ CM and Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ CM offers 35 verified integration partners, while Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ CM leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ CM: No. Reseliva Booking Engine and Channel Manager System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 86 and Reseliva has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property