The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Smart Finder shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Smart Finder users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs—whether it’s seamless integration, ease of use, or a trusted brand with a broad feature set. Cloudbeds PMS stands out for its extensive reviews, recent positive feedback, and a comprehensive suite that simplifies operations, while Soraso by Smart Finder remains unreviewed and less established in the market.
Given the data, Cloudbeds’ higher rating, larger user base, and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice. Are you ready to see how these products compare across key factors?
Cloudbeds and Soraso aim to streamline hotel operations but diverge significantly in market presence and feature depth. Cloudbeds provides a full suite of tools—channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and integrations—while Soraso’s limited verified partnerships and lack of user reviews suggest a minimal feature footprint.
Your team’s experience will vary based on their needs: Cloudbeds offers a proven, feature-rich platform with a track record of customer satisfaction; Soraso’s offerings are less transparent and unreviewed. Which solution better matches your hotel’s maturity and complexity?
If your hotel needs a trusted, scalable PMS with a wide feature set, go with Cloudbeds. Its extensive integrations, automation capabilities, and proven customer support make it ideal for properties seeking growth and operational efficiency.
If your hotel is smaller, less complex, or prefers a more niche, unreviewed system, Soraso might suffice, but the lack of reviews and market data makes Cloudbeds the safer, more strategic choice. For most hotels aiming to expand or optimize, Cloudbeds is the clear leader.
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.61/5 for ease of use, backed by over 1,000 reviews and recent positive feedback emphasizing its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and quick onboarding. Its support team also receives favorable ratings, with many users describing their onboarding as straightforward and helpful.
In contrast, Soraso’s ease of use is unreviewed, and with no available user feedback, its usability remains uncertain. Given Cloudbeds’ recent reviews and high ratings, the edge goes to Cloudbeds for simplicity and user-friendliness.
Cloudbeds offers 64 features, including a channel manager, real-time 2-way integrations, online check-in, automated night audits, guest CRM, and a mobile app—covering virtually all operational needs. Soraso’s feature list remains undisclosed, and no independent reviews verify its capabilities or depth.
Based solely on available data and market reputation, Cloudbeds’ extensive feature set and proven integrations give it a decisive edge. If feature completeness is your priority, Cloudbeds clearly leads.
Cloudbeds is rated 4.41/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during onboarding. Users frequently highlight its quick support responses and comprehensive help resources.
Soraso has no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Given Cloudbeds’ proven track record, the edge goes to Cloudbeds for reliable, well-rated support.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and other hospitality systems—ensuring extensive connectivity. Soraso’s integration count is limited to just 2 verified partners, with only one shared partner (IDeaS).
For hotels relying on a broad ecosystem of integrations to streamline operations, Cloudbeds offers a clear advantage. Its extensive marketplace and verified partnerships make it the more versatile option.
Cloudbeds has a 4.63/5 overall rating from 1,071 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and positive impact on revenue. Its hotel segment ratings are high across boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties, with many reviews in the last six months.
Soraso has no reviews or ratings available, so no direct comparison is possible. Based on current data, Cloudbeds is the better-rated system by a significant margin, reinforcing its market leadership.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, and no mention of additional implementation or setup fees. Soraso’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison.
Given Cloudbeds’ transparent pricing model, your team can budget accordingly. The lack of pricing information for Soraso makes it difficult to evaluate value or affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers minimal tech or has significantly lower complexity and budget constraints.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes scalability, proven support, or extensive feature sets.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, well-reviewed PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Its extensive features, recent positive reviews, and market presence make it the clear choice for most properties looking to grow, streamline, and improve guest experiences.
Soraso remains unreviewed and with minimal market data, suggesting it’s best suited for small, simple operations or hotels with very specific, niche needs. For those prioritizing reliability and proven performance, Cloudbeds is the stronger option.
In summary, if your hotel values a proven, feature-rich system supported by a large community of users, Cloudbeds should be your choice. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations make it the more dependable and versatile PMS for ambitious hoteliers.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Soraso share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Soraso share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Soraso offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Soraso: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Smart Finder has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor