The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 453 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Sample PMS shines .
Yanolja Cloud Solution shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 453 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 453 |
After analyzing 453 verified reviews, Sample PMS users most value its , while Yanolja Cloud Solution users highlight integration with pms and channel manager, booking flow and usability, direct bookings and revenue. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration with PMS and Channel Manager
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Flow and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct Bookings and Revenue
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory and Pricing
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Compatibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 252 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #46 0 reviews | #7 99 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #29 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 159 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 203 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #50 0 reviews | #7 69 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #13 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 48 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #28 7 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #3 342 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
Choosing between Codebranch Booking Engine by Sample PMS and Yanolja Booking Engine by Yanolja Cloud Solution hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to streamline reservations and boost direct bookings, but they differ markedly in market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. With the limited reviews for Sample PMS, Yanolja’s solution stands out as the more tested and supported choice for hotels seeking a reliable booking engine.
In this comparison, we’ll examine which platform offers better value, usability, features, support, and suitability for your property type. By the end, you'll have a clear answer on which product best suits your hotel's ambitions.
Codebranch, developed by Sample PMS, presents a booking engine that integrates directly with PMS, designed primarily for internal operational efficiency. It lacks publicly available reviews, making its real-world performance uncertain, especially compared to Yanolja, which boasts over 380 recent reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating.
Yanolja’s booking engine excels in a broad feature set, international presence, and strong user satisfaction. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, support, and high recommendation scores, making it a more dependable choice for hotels aiming to increase direct bookings. Does your hotel prioritize proven support and extensive features?
If your hotel primarily needs a straightforward booking solution tightly integrated with your existing PMS, Codebranch could suffice, especially if your property is small and operations are simple. However, given the lack of recent reviews or detailed feature data, uncertainty remains about its performance and scalability.
For hotels seeking a full-featured, internationally supported booking engine capable of handling multiple languages, currencies, and digital marketing integrations, Yanolja is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (22 unique features), higher user ratings, and global presence make it suitable for a wide range of property types. If your goal is reliable growth and operational efficiency, go with Yanolja.
Sample PMS’s booking engine has no available user ratings or recent reviews, making usability assessments impossible. Conversely, Yanolja’s platform scores highly across the board, with a 4.76/5 ease of use rating and positive recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support team.
Yanolja’s reviews mention that staff find the interface user-friendly, and onboarding is smooth, with a 4.71/5 rating. Its dedicated support team adds to the ease of adoption, reducing the learning curve. Edge: Yanolja.
Codebranch’s offering appears minimal, with no unique features listed or verified integrations, suggesting a potentially limited feature set. Yanolja’s platform boasts 22 features such as multi-currency, multi-lingual support, loyalty integrations, social media booking, and automated reporting—many designed to boost revenue and guest engagement.
The platform also offers mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, pooled inventory, and a variety of communication tools that Codebranch likely lacks. Given the detailed features and recent reviews, Yanolja’s feature set clearly outperforms. Edge: Yanolja.
Sample PMS provides no data on support quality or user reviews, leaving support effectiveness and responsiveness unverified. Yanolja, however, scores 4.78/5 for customer support, with reviewers citing quick, helpful responses and dedicated account management.
Review quotes describe Yanolja’s support team as “spectacular,” making the platform easier to implement and operate. For a hotel relying on dependable support to troubleshoot and train staff, Yanolja is the safer choice. Edge: Yanolja.
Codebranch’s integration options are unlisted, suggesting limited or unverified partner connections. Yanolja’s platform integrates with 157 verified partners, including major property management, accounting, and marketing tools like Xero, QuickBooks, and Profitroom.
This extensive integration network enables a more connected and automated hotel operation, reducing manual work and errors. For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected system, Yanolja’s integration count and quality give it the edge. Edge: Yanolja.
Since Codebranch has no recent reviews or scores, it cannot be evaluated on user satisfaction. Yanolja, with 380 reviews, holds a 4.63/5 rating overall, and a 9.49/10 NPS score, indicating strong customer loyalty.
Reviewers from various segments—resorts, boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature richness. For reliability and proven satisfaction, Yanolja clearly ranks higher. Edge: Yanolja.
Codebranch’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving potential costs and value assessment uncertain. Yanolja charges $100/month for its booking engine, with no setup or implementation fees, offering transparent, predictable pricing.
Given the extensive features and support, Yanolja’s pricing appears reasonable and aligned with market standards for comparable hotel booking engines. Lack of pricing info for Codebranch leaves its value proposition ambiguous. Edge: Yanolja.
Due to limited feature and review data, Codebranch may suit smaller, less complex properties that want basic functionality without growth ambitions.
Yanolja’s flexibility makes it suitable for a wide array of property types, especially those seeking to expand their digital reach.
Codebranch’s offering appears limited, with no recent reviews, no disclosed features, and minimal support data. Its core strength might be basic reservation management within a PMS environment, but it lacks the depth and credibility needed for growth.
Yanolja’s booking engine, with over 380 recent reviews and a 4.63/5 rating, demonstrates broad adoption and proven performance. Its extensive feature set, international presence, and high customer satisfaction make it the more reliable choice for hotels serious about increasing direct bookings and streamlining operations.
If you prioritize a tested and supported platform with comprehensive features, go with Yanolja. For properties with minimal online booking needs and a preference for internal systems, Codebranch might work, but its limited data makes it a less confident choice.
This comparison clarifies that Yanolja’s booking engine is the more mature, well-supported, and feature-rich solution for modern hotels. Its recent reviews and strong ratings underscore its ability to meet diverse property needs while providing ongoing support. If growth, reliability, and customer experience are priorities, Yanolja is the clear winner.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Codebranch Booking Engine Test and Yanolja Booking Engine share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 10 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We can now manage every property in our franchise from a single dashboard, track performance instantly, and know that our team has 24/7 support whenever it’s needed. It has complet..."
What hoteliers love
Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-... Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-time updates and eliminating risks of manual error and overbookings. This functionality enhances both front-office and back-end processes, helping hotels to save time and reduce reliance on third-party platforms.
Users find the current booking flow lengthy and fragmented, suggesting a more streamlined process would reduce drop-offs and increase conversions. The... Users find the current booking flow lengthy and fragmented, suggesting a more streamlined process would reduce drop-offs and increase conversions. They recommend a two- or three-step process for smoother booking flows, particularly on mobile, ensuring a better guest experience.
The engine proves effective at increasing direct bookings, reducing commissions paid to OTAs, and thereby preserving hotel revenue. Users highlight it... The engine proves effective at increasing direct bookings, reducing commissions paid to OTAs, and thereby preserving hotel revenue. Users highlight its ability to attract direct traffic to hotel websites due to its user-friendly design.
Where hoteliers push back
While the booking engine provides essential reporting features, users desire more advanced analytical tools and customization options to better track... While the booking engine provides essential reporting features, users desire more advanced analytical tools and customization options to better track performance metrics and support strategic decision-making. Integration with external analytics platforms like Google Analytics is especially noted as a needed improvement.
Despite its advantages, users point out that mobile usability can still be improved especially regarding UI, which is sometimes seen as cramped. A mor... Despite its advantages, users point out that mobile usability can still be improved especially regarding UI, which is sometimes seen as cramped. A more device-responsive design could enhance overall user interactions and capture of mobile-based reservations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Codebranch Booking Engine Test and Yanolja Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Codebranch Booking Engine Test offers 0 verified integration partners, while Yanolja Booking Engine offers 157. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Yanolja Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Codebranch Booking Engine Test: No. Yanolja Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Sample PMS has an HT Score of 0 and Yanolja Cloud Solution has 92. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor