The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Comanche PMS and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their offerings and maturity differ significantly. While Comanche is a localized solution with a long history in select regions, Infor’s cloud-based platform boasts a broader feature set and global presence. Consider whether your team prioritizes extensive features or a simplified interface—your choice should directly support your hotel’s scale and strategic goals.
Comanche PMS offers a basic yet functional management system focused on core hotel operations, primarily serving smaller to mid-sized hotels in Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Conversely, Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable solution with a strong international footprint, especially in North America and Europe. Are you prepared to handle a more complex system, or do you prefer a straightforward, regionally tailored tool? The decision depends on your hotel’s complexity, size, and geographic footprint.
Comanche PMS is designed for hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-conscious property management system that covers basic operations. It’s suitable for smaller hotels, resorts, and serviced apartments looking for a reliable solution without many frills, especially in markets where local support is preferred.
Infor HMS appeals to hotels that need a more extensive, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations, revenue management, and integrations at a global scale. Its modular design supports larger, multi-property chains or hotels with diverse operational needs. If your hotel requires detailed reporting, revenue optimization tools, and multi-lingual support, Infor is the more robust choice.
However, Comanche’s limited feature set—no shared features and just 0 exclusive features—means it lacks many of the automation, guest profiles, and advanced modules that Infor provides. Infor’s 20 exclusive features, including housekeeping, guest CRM, revenue management, and automated night audits, make it a comprehensive platform for hotels aiming to grow or improve operational efficiency. Do you prioritize simplicity or features? Which aligns better with your hotel’s current and future needs?
Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, which suggests limited feedback on usability. Its interface and onboarding are likely minimal, probably more suited to hotels with staff familiar with older or simpler systems.
Infor HMS, on the other hand, boasts a user-friendly interface with a 3.88/5 ease of use rating and positive comments about its intuitiveness once users familiarize themselves with the layout. The onboarding process receives a 3.64/5 rating, indicating a decent experience, though some users mention that the interface isn’t particularly attractive or modern. Support responsiveness is consistently rated well, critical for training and troubleshooting. Edge: Infor.
Comanche International features zero unique or shared features, indicating a minimal functional scope focused on core property management tasks. Its offerings likely include basic reservations, front desk management, and billing, but lack automation or guest engagement tools.
In contrast, Infor HMS offers 20 exclusive features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, online support, multi-lingual support, and revenue management modules. These additions enable more sophisticated operations, automation, and guest personalization, which can significantly improve efficiency and guest satisfaction. For hotels seeking comprehensive management capabilities, Infor clearly leads. Edge: Infor.
Comanche International’s support details are scarce, and no recent reviews comment on its responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent feedback suggests limited support engagement or a small user base.
Infor HMS’s support scores a solid 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Users describe the support team as helpful during onboarding and when resolving issues, which is vital for operational stability. While some mention inconsistent updates causing disruptions, overall, Infor’s support performance appears more reliable. Edge: Infor.
Comanche PMS integrates with 12 verified partners, including well-known providers like SiteMinder, LodgIQ, and D-Edge. However, it lacks many of the broader integrations needed for seamless multi-channel distribution, revenue management, or guest engagement.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partners, including major industry players like SiteMinder, RateGain, Onity, and Duetto. Its extensive ecosystem covers booking engines, revenue tools, CRM, and payment solutions, offering a versatile platform for hotels aiming to centralize operations. For broader connectivity and automation, Infor’s integration network is the clear advantage. Edge: Infor.
Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or hotel property type preferences.
Infor HMS has accumulated 46 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.04/5. Hotels across various segments—independent hotels, boutique hotels, and branded properties—rate it favorably, especially appreciating its scalability and support. Larger and chain hotels, particularly in North America and Europe, tend to rate it higher due to its feature set and integration capabilities. Overall, Infor’s recent reviews and higher rating make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Pricing details for Comanche PMS are not publicly available, which is common for localized or bespoke systems. Costs may vary based on implementation and support needs.
Infor HMS also does not publish transparent pricing, typical for enterprise solutions. Its costs are likely based on the number of properties, users, or modules deployed, making it essential to request a tailored quote. Both systems require direct contact for detailed pricing, so consider your budget and scalability when evaluating.
Hotels that should consider Comanche PMS:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider Infor HMS:
Not ideal if:
Comanche PMS is a basic property management solution suited to smaller hotels and resorts seeking reliability without a hefty price tag. Its limited features and regional focus make it less ideal for growing or multi-property operations but sufficient for straightforward management.
Infor HMS offers a comprehensive, scalable system with extensive integrations, modules, and support for larger or international hotels. Its broad feature set and recent high ratings suggest it’s the better choice for hotels prioritizing automation, guest experience, and operational efficiency.
If your hotel needs a simple, cost-effective solution and your operations are manageable within basic PMS features, Comanche might suffice. However, for hotels aiming to expand, automate, and improve guest personalization, Infor provides a more complete, future-proof platform. Ultimately, Infor is the stronger pick given its recent reviews, higher ratings, and extensive feature ecosystem.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor