The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical to your hotel's operational success. Both Comanche International and Preno aim to streamline daily tasks, but they diverge significantly in their offerings, market presence, and user experiences. While Comanche has a long-standing history, its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest limited current support. Preno, meanwhile, boasts a high rating, extensive recent reviews, and more features tailored for modern hotel operations. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Comanche International offers a comprehensive PMS with an emphasis on integrated solutions for hotels and resorts since 1996. However, with a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, it appears to lack recent user feedback, raising questions about ongoing support and product updates. Preno, in comparison, scores nearly 80 on the HT Score, with 144 recent reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating active customer satisfaction.
The core problem both products address is operational management—reservation, billing, housekeeping, and guest service. But while Comanche’s older, less documented system might suit legacy properties or those in regions where it’s established, Preno’s modern, cloud-based approach offers more agility. Are you comfortable with a platform that has no recent reviews or one with a thriving user community and frequent updates?
If your hotel needs a historically integrated, comprehensive solution but can tolerate limited recent support or updates, Comanche might be suitable. However, for properties seeking a modern, feature-rich PMS with extensive recent user feedback, Preno is the clear choice.
For boutique hotels, motels, or those looking for an easy-to-use system with strong support, Preno’s 4.78/5 ease of use rating and 4.8/5 customer support score make it a better fit. Larger properties or those in regions where Comanche’s support is less accessible might prefer Preno’s broader international presence—operating in 23 countries versus Comanche’s regional footprint.
Comanche International has a 0/5 Ease of Use rating, suggesting staff might find it difficult or outdated. There are no recent reviews to confirm its usability, which raises concerns about onboarding and daily management. Meanwhile, Preno earns a near-perfect 4.78/5, with numerous reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface.
Recent reviews highlight Preno’s simple layout, seamless navigation, and helpful onboarding, reducing staff training time significantly. Support responsiveness and ongoing upgrades further ease daily use. Edge: Preno.
Comanche offers no documented features outside its core IT solution services, which limits its appeal for hospitality-specific needs. Preno, however, provides over 30 features, including payment processing, calendar views, automated night audits, guest CRM, revenue management, and a booking engine—all tailored to hotel operations.
Preno’s features directly impact revenue and efficiency, such as real-time status updates, dynamic pricing, and integrated channel management. Its mobile app and automation tools make daily management more practical. Edge: Preno.
Comanche’s support ratings are unavailable, and reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge support quality or onboarding effectiveness. Conversely, Preno has a 4.8/5 customer support score, with reviews praising responsiveness and helpfulness, even during complex transitions.
Many users mention Preno’s proactive support team guiding them through setup and ongoing issues, contributing to a high likelihood to recommend. This active support ecosystem is vital for ensuring your team adapts quickly. Edge: Preno.
Comanche has 12 verified partners, including industry staples like STAAH, SiteMinder, and Cendyn. Its integrations focus on traditional hotel tools, but its limited partner count may restrict options for expanding or customizing your tech stack.
Preno boasts 17 verified integrations, including popular solutions like Xero, SiteMinder, and TrustYou. Its broader partner network supports multi-channel distribution, guest communication, and analytics, enabling more comprehensive operations. Edge: Preno.
With zero recent reviews, Comanche’s rating is effectively unverified, leaving its user satisfaction in doubt. Preno, on the other hand, has a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 144 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support quality, and feature depth.
In particular, boutique hotels, motels, and small chains actively recommend Preno for its simplicity and customer service, while Comanche’s older reputation and lack of current reviews suggest it’s less relevant today. Edge: Preno.
Comanche International does not publicly disclose pricing, suggesting a customized quote depending on your hotel’s size and needs. Preno charges a flat rate of $800 per month, with no mention of additional setup or per-room fees.
While Comanche might appeal for large-scale, bespoke solutions, Preno’s transparent pricing and clear feature set provide better value for small to mid-sized properties seeking predictable costs.
Not ideal if you prioritize modern features, quick onboarding, or international support.
Not ideal if your property relies on highly customized, legacy systems or if your hotel operates in regions with limited internet access.
Comanche International, with its long history, aims to serve comprehensive hospitality management but shows no recent customer feedback, which diminishes confidence in ongoing support. Its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it may not be the best choice in today’s fast-paced hospitality environment.
Preno’s high ratings, recent reviews, and extensive feature set make it the smarter option for most hotels today. Its ease of use, strong support, and broad integrations support faster onboarding and operational efficiency, especially for hotels looking to modernize or expand.
If your hotel needs a modern, well-supported PMS with proven user satisfaction, Preno is the clear choice. For legacy systems or regional-specific requirements, Comanche might still be relevant—but only if you can verify its current support viability.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor