The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #49 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing between Comanche PMS and Redforts involves understanding their core strengths and how they fit your hotel’s needs. Comanche PMS, developed by a Thai company with over 900 clients since 1996, is a broad IT solution serving various hospitality types but lacks recent reviews and a clear user feedback footprint. Conversely, Redforts, a newer platform with 40 reviews and a recent NPS score of 9.5/10, is a highly rated, all-in-one management system that many hoteliers find straightforward and efficient. Are you prioritizing extensive integrations or a more modern, user-friendly interface?
While Comanche PMS offers a comprehensive solution for larger operations and businesses seeking a long-standing provider, Redforts emphasizes ease of use, rapid onboarding, and an active support community. Your decision hinges on whether you value a proven, extensive platform or a streamlined, highly-rated system with modern features.
Comanche PMS aims to deliver an all-encompassing IT solution for hotels, restaurants, clubs, and resorts, focusing on operational control and customized integrations. Its lack of recent reviews and a near-zero HT Score suggest limited recent customer feedback, raising questions about ongoing support and development.
Redforts, with its high recent ratings—4.68/5 for ease of use and 4.53/5 for customer support—clearly resonates with users seeking an intuitive and supportive management platform. Its 40 reviews, mostly recent, show consistent positive feedback, especially around ease of use and operational efficiency.
Both platforms address hotel management but diverge sharply in user experience and community feedback. Comanche is less transparent regarding recent customer sentiment, while Redforts demonstrates strong, recent validation from users. Which aspect is more critical to your team—reliability from a longstanding provider or modern user-centric features?
If your hotel needs a contemporary, straightforward PMS with high reviews and active customer support, go with Redforts. Its ease of use, built-in features like channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools—plus a 95% likelihood to recommend—make it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels, hostels, or boutique properties.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, long-established system capable of complex integrations and specific enterprise needs, Comanche PMS might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews and support clarity makes this risky. It’s better suited for operations with dedicated IT resources and a preference for legacy systems.
For most hotels seeking a modern, well-supported, and highly-rated solution, Redforts is the safer, more proven choice. Comanche’s older reputation and sparse recent feedback make it less appealing unless you already have experience with their platform.
Redforts scores 4.68/5 for ease of use, reflecting an intuitive interface and quick onboarding, with many reviews praising its simplicity and minimal training needs. Customer support also earns a high 4.53/5, with users highlighting quick, friendly responses and ongoing assistance.
Comanche PMS, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating, indicating no recent reviews or user feedback, which suggests uncertainty about its current usability or support quality. The lack of recent data makes it impossible to assess its user-friendliness today.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers a rich set of 46 features including a booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, multi-currency support, and more. Many features like digital registration, guest messaging, and integrated ID scanning are designed to automate and simplify daily tasks.
Comanche PMS, by contrast, provides no specific features listed or recent innovations, indicating it may lack the modern, modular capabilities found in Redforts. The absence of detailed features or recent updates signals it’s less likely to meet current hotel management demands.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’s customer support, rated at 4.53/5, is highly regarded, with many reviews mentioning prompt, friendly, and helpful responses. Its recent NPS score of 9.5/10 underscores strong overall customer satisfaction and ongoing support.
Comanche PMS, with a 0/5 support rating and no recent reviews, provides no evidence of current customer service quality. Its lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to judge support effectiveness or responsiveness.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts connects with at least 2 verified partners, including WuBook and Mr Winston, and offers a comprehensive suite of 46 features. Its integrations with booking engines, channel managers, POS, and electronic locks facilitate smooth operational workflows.
Comanche PMS, with only 12 verified partners and no recent activity, appears limited in integration options—potentially restricting flexibility and scalability. Its older partner list suggests it may not support the latest third-party platforms.
Edge: Redforts.
Since Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, it’s impossible to judge current hotel sentiment. Redforts, on the other hand, boasts 40 reviews with an average score of 72.84/100 and a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating very high satisfaction among recent users.
User comments on Redforts praise its ease of use, efficiency, and support quality, especially for small and mid-sized properties. The lack of recent feedback for Comanche PMS makes any comparison favor Redforts.
Edge: Redforts.
Comanche PMS does not publicly disclose pricing, which could imply customized quotes or complex pricing structures. Its lack of transparency makes evaluating value difficult.
Redforts charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation costs or tiered pricing. Its transparent pricing model and positive reviews regarding ROI demonstrate clear value.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Comanche PMS is a legacy system with a deep history but limited recent validation. Its lack of recent reviews and support ratings makes it a risky choice unless your team has prior experience and specific needs that align with its capabilities.
Redforts, with a recent high review volume, excellent scores for ease of use, support, and features, offers a modern, flexible platform suited for most small to mid-sized hotels. Its active customer feedback and growing integration ecosystem make it the safer, more reliable choice today.
If your priority is a well-supported, easy-to-use platform that keeps up with technological advances, go with Redforts. If your operation depends on a long-term, highly customizable solution and you’re prepared to manage legacy software, then Comanche might still serve some niche needs—but it’s not the recommended option based on current data.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor