The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Comanche International shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Comanche International users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Comanche PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, resources, and growth ambitions. While Comanche claims to serve a broad range of hospitality operations since 1996, it offers no recent reviews or user ratings, raising questions about current functionality and support. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS, backed by 32 recent reviews and a high NPS score, demonstrates a strong reputation for ease of use, support, and feature depth. Which platform truly aligns with your hotel's goals?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but their market presence and technological maturity differ significantly. Comanche, with no recent reviews, appears less active or less visible in the current market, especially outside its core regions. Shiji, with a global footprint across 18 countries and extensive third-party integrations, clearly has a modern, cloud-based architecture designed for scalable, multi-property management. Which product aligns with your hotel’s geographic and operational scale?
Are you prioritizing a mature, widely supported PMS with proven scalability, or are you open to exploring a less documented solution? Your choice depends on whether you value current user feedback and comprehensive features, or if you are willing to consider a lesser-known platform with limited recent data. How confident are you in the stability and ongoing support of each option?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, well-established system with a long history of serving hotels in Asia Pacific, Comanche might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or visible customer satisfaction data, it’s difficult to confirm if the platform currently meets modern hospitality demands. For hotels seeking a scalable, modern cloud-native PMS with extensive features and proven support, Shiji Daylight PMS is clearly the superior choice. It offers a comprehensive suite of 98 features, including guest profiles, online check-in, and integrated CRS, that support high-volume operations.
Your hotel with a focus on ease of use, quick onboarding, and robust support should lean toward Shiji. The platform’s high ratings in user-friendliness, training, and customer support—averaging 4.63/5, 4.53/5, and an NPS of 8.94/10—demonstrate its reliability in real-world environments. If operational efficiency and guest personalization are critical, Shiji’s extensive feature set makes it a more future-proof investment.
Conversely, if your operation is small, regional, or heavily dependent on legacy systems, Comanche’s lack of recent data makes it less advisable. Without current reviews or clear support metrics, committing to Comanche could pose risks for scalability, ongoing support, and feature updates. Which platform do you see as capable of supporting your hotel’s growth and technological evolution?
Shiji Daylight PMS scores a remarkable 4.63/5 in ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward training materials. Users praise how quickly new staff can learn the system and perform daily tasks, thanks to detailed videos and user-friendly design. Support teams are also consistently rated highly, facilitating smoother onboarding and ongoing assistance.
In contrast, Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its current usability or onboarding experience. Its long-standing presence suggests familiarity for some users, but without updated feedback, it’s unclear whether it matches modern usability standards. Based on available data, the edge clearly goes to Shiji.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a robust 98 features, including guest profiles, multilingual support, online check-in/out, task management, integrated CRS, and more. It also includes advanced modules like digital registration, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions. Many features cater to large, multi-property operations, enabling detailed guest data management and operational automation.
Comanche PMS, on the other hand, provides no documented features or recent updates, making it impossible to compare feature depth directly. Its lack of recent reviews suggests it may not have kept pace with technological advancements or modern guest expectations.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Group’s support receives a high rating of 4.53/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful training materials. Support staff is frequently described as proactive and able to resolve issues efficiently, which is critical during implementation and daily operations.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Comanche PMS, leaving its support performance ambiguous. Without evidence of current customer satisfaction, it’s safer to trust Shiji’s well-documented support excellence.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji PMS integrates with 64 verified partners, including major systems like SiteMinder, Onity, D-Edge, Duetto, and Cendyn. These integrations allow hotels to connect POS, revenue management, booking engines, and other operational tools, supporting complex, multi-system environments.
Comanche PMS has only 12 verified partners, mainly regional or less commonly used integrations like Vertical Booking and RateGain. Its limited integrations could restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with preferred or modern technology solutions.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
While Comanche has no recent reviews or ratings, Shiji Daylight PMS has accumulated 32 recent reviews, with an average NPS score of 8.94/10. Hoteliers across segments, especially luxury and branded hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and feature depth.
The absence of recent feedback for Comanche suggests it’s no longer front-of-mind for modern hoteliers. Based on current data, Shiji is clearly the higher-rated platform.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Comanche PMS’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free tier or trial. Its unclear pricing model makes it difficult to evaluate value or compare with competitors.
Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or discounts, aligning with typical cloud-based PMS pricing. Its transparent fee structure offers clarity for budget planning.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Comanche PMS’s long-standing presence and regional focus make it suitable for smaller or regional operators with familiar workflows, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and support data raise concerns about its current viability. It’s best suited for operations that prioritize a known, simple solution over technological innovation.
Shiji Daylight PMS, with extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and a broad feature set, clearly stands out for hotels aiming to modernize operations, enhance guest experiences, and support growth across regions. Its cloud architecture, integrations, and user-friendly design make it a dependable choice for most hotel types.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable platform that adapts to modern hospitality demands, Shiji is the clear winner. However, if you’re constrained by regional or legacy system considerations, Comanche might still serve in a limited capacity—though with significant caveats.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Comanche PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Comanche PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Comanche PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Comanche PMS: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Comanche International has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor