The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Acigrup shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Acigrup users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
You're evaluating two property management systems: Counter by Counter and Hotel Software by Acigrup. Both aim to streamline operations, but Counter is the clear leader given its robust feature set, recent reviews, and higher user confidence. Counter's focus on hostels and smaller properties makes it an attractive, cost-effective choice for certain segments, while Acigrup's minimal online presence and lack of recent feedback weaken its position.
Which system truly fits your hotel's specific needs? Let's compare them directly.
Counter and Acigrup both claim to simplify hotel management, but Counter’s more recent reviews and higher ratings show it has gained significant user confidence. Counter’s 54 reviews in the last six months with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction; Acigrup, with no recent reviews or verified feedback, offers no such validation.
Counter's ease of use (4.6/5) and customer support (4.96/5) are consistently praised, unlike Acigrup, which lacks recent user feedback. Counter’s extensive feature set, including channel management, payment processing, and automated night audits, outpaces Acigrup’s limited online footprint, making Counter the more reliable choice today.
Are you willing to choose a system with no recent user validation? If not, Counter is the safer bet.
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel, boutique, or city-center property, Counter’s dedicated features and user base make it the logical choice. Its focus on hostels, with 83% of its users in this segment, means it’s optimized for their specific workflows, especially for small to medium-sized properties looking for an affordable, easy-to-use PMS.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, Counter’s verified partnerships with platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds make it the better choice. Acigrup, on the other hand, offers no recent reviews or verified integrations, so its suitability remains untested.
For hotels seeking a trusted, well-supported platform with a strong reputation, Counter stands out.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5, with many reviews highlighting its simple, intuitive interface that staff can learn quickly. Customers praise its mobile-friendly design, which allows management on the go, along with onboarding ratings of 4.7/5. Support staff like Evelyn and Max are often commended for their responsiveness.
In contrast, Acigrup provides no recent reviews or user ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified. Its lack of documented user experience makes Counter the clear winner for hotels prioritizing straightforward, quick adoption.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including a channel manager, integrated payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, and guest CRM—features absent from Acigrup. Its housekeeper module, automated night audit, multi-lingual, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking are tailored for small to midsize properties seeking comprehensive operational control.
Acigrup’s feature set remains undocumented, with no verified features or integrations available publicly. Given Counter’s extensive feature count and proven capabilities, it offers a distinctly richer toolset.
Edge: Counter.
Customer support at Counter is rated 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated support staff. Hoteliers note that Evelyn and Max are “super responsive,” and the support team often resolves issues promptly, contributing to high user satisfaction.
Acigrup offers no recent customer support ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Without recent feedback, Counter’s support reputation clearly favors it as the more dependable option.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, offering broad connectivity for distribution, payments, and access control. Its integrations streamline operations and expand market reach.
Acigrup has no verified partnerships or integrations documented publicly, raising questions about its connectivity and operational flexibility. For a hotel seeking seamless platform integration, Counter’s open ecosystem makes it the better choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall rating of 4.73/5 and NPS score of 9.02/10 reflect high customer satisfaction. Its reviews are mostly recent, with users highlighting ease of use, support, and automation, especially among hostels and small hotels.
Acigrup lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Given Counter’s solid recent feedback, it’s the clear favorite among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publish explicit pricing but offers no-trial, no-implementation fees, and a flat monthly rate. Its value-for-money rating of 4.8/5 suggests competitive pricing, especially for small properties.
Acigrup's pricing remains undisclosed, with no trial options or transparent fee structure available. The lack of pricing transparency combined with no recent reviews diminishes confidence in Acigrup’s value proposition.
Not ideal if: You operate at a large chain level needing extensive corporate reporting, or if you require a PMS with a well-documented support network outside of Europe and North America.
Not ideal if: Your hotel needs proven reliability, recent user feedback, or a comprehensive feature set.
Counter, with its 54 recent reviews and high ratings, is a proven, well-regarded system. Its extensive features, proven integrations, and responsive support make it suitable for small to midsize properties, especially hostels, seeking automation and operational simplicity.
Acigrup, with no recent feedback or verified features, offers no clear advantages. Its unverified status and lack of online presence make it an unreliable choice for hotels that value transparency, proven performance, and ongoing support.
If your goal is a reliable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, Counter is the clear choice. Acigrup may remain a placeholder without current validation, making it a risky option for your hotel’s management needs.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Hotel Software share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Acigrup |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Hotel Software share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Hotel Software offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Hotel Software: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Acigrup has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor