The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module.
Hotel.care shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Hotel.care users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | #75 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #55 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Hotel.care by Hotel.care hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational style. Counter’s established presence, extensive reviews, and high ratings make it a trusted choice for small to mid-sized hostels, while Hotel.care’s innovative, API-rich approach caters to properties seeking maximum flexibility and integration. Both aim to streamline bookings and operations, but their core strengths differ. So, which platform will truly elevate your hotel's management?
Counter has built a reputation as a straightforward, user-friendly PMS for hostels, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, backed by 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Its ease of onboarding (4.7/5) and customer support (4.96/5) are highly praised, especially for small teams managing multiple booking channels. Hotel.care, however, currently has no reviews or ratings, making its suitability and user satisfaction less clear.
Counter’s median review highlights its clean, intuitive interface, fast support, and automation features like POS integration, yet persistent bugs—particularly with overbooking and bed display—are noted issues. Conversely, Hotel.care emphasizes flexibility, API integrations, and a modern, headless architecture, but without user feedback, its user-friendliness or reliability remains untested. Are you willing to adopt a proven, reviewed system or explore a new, flexible platform?
If your hotel needs a dependable, well-rated PMS primarily for hostel or small hotel operations, Counter is the clear choice, with its extensive review base and proven track record. Its strengths include a straightforward interface, rapid onboarding, and high customer satisfaction, especially in support and automation.
If your property demands deep customization, multiple integrations, and a highly flexible, API-first architecture to connect with various third-party systems, Hotel.care’s headless design and 57 APIs make it attractive. However, without user reviews, its real-world performance and support quality are uncertain, so it’s better suited for tech-savvy teams willing to experiment.
In summary, for reliability and a proven track record, go with Counter. For maximum customization and future-proofing, consider Hotel.care—if you’re comfortable with less user feedback.
Counter’s UI scores 4.6/5, with many reviewers citing its intuitive, simple interface that’s easy to learn and operate. Onboarding is rated 4.7/5, and staff adoption appears smooth, supported by positive comments about staff training and minimal learning curve. Customer support is also a standout, with a 4.96/5 rating and praise for responsiveness, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max.
Hotel.care, however, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making its ease of use hard to assess. Its API-driven, headless design suggests a more complex setup that may require technical expertise, potentially making staff adoption slower unless your team is highly familiar with APIs and system integrations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 17 shared features and two exclusive ones: a housekeeping module and cloud-based operation. Its automation includes POS, online check-in/out, and automatic payments, which are especially beneficial for hostels and small hotels. Its channel manager supports multiple platforms, with integrations like Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds.
Hotel.care boasts 27 unique features, including transactional emails, guest messaging (SMS), gift vouchers, task management, digital registration, and revenue management modules. Its API-rich environment allows for extensive customization, integration, and advanced digital features, but the absence of user reviews limits insights into actual deployment.
Edge: Hotel.care, for feature breadth and API flexibility, assuming you require deep customization.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive assistance from team members like Evelyn and Max. Multiple users appreciate their support team’s professionalism, though some note slower responses during off-hours.
Hotel.care lacks any publicly available customer support ratings or reviews, making it difficult to evaluate. Its recent launch and small team (five employees) suggest support might be limited or less proven, especially without customer feedback.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including Stripe, WuBook, SiteMinder, and Cloudbeds, providing robust connectivity with booking channels and payment providers. Its integration with industry-standard platforms facilitates streamlined operations and consolidated income management.
Hotel.care, with only three verified integrations (including Stripe and Pitchup.com), offers a narrower ecosystem, but its API-first design allows for potential expansion. Its extensive API library (57 APIs) means that, with technical resources, your hotel could develop custom integrations, but out-of-the-box connectivity remains limited.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with 54 reviews in the last six months and a 4.73/5 overall rating. Hotels of various sizes, predominantly hostels (83%), praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Properties like hostels appreciate its clarity and simplicity, while some mention bugs affecting bookings.
Hotel.care has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or to understand how properties perceive its performance. Its recent launch and small user base mean it has yet to build a reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list a pricing structure publicly, suggesting a custom quote based on property needs. It does not offer a freemium or trial version, which may be a consideration for smaller properties testing the system.
Hotel.care charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no free trial or freemium option. Its pricing reflects its advanced, API-heavy design, which could be cost-effective for larger, tech-savvy properties but might be steep for smaller operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter provides a tested, user-friendly PMS with strong ratings, especially suited for hostels and small hotels that prioritize ease of use, automation, and support. Its existing integrations, positive reviews, and operational simplicity make it a dependable choice for properties seeking immediate, reliable management.
Hotel.care offers an innovative, API-first platform designed for highly customizable operations. Its flexibility and extensive feature set appeal to tech-savvy properties with complex needs or those aiming for digital transformation, but the lack of user feedback introduces risk.
If your hotel values proven reliability, ease of use, and extensive support, Counter remains the stronger choice. If your team can handle a more technical setup and seeks advanced customization, Hotel.care could be worth exploring—if you’re prepared for less review-backed certainty.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Hotel.care share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Hotel.care share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Hotel.care offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Hotel.care: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Hotel.care has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor