The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 1 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | #57 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | #69 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | #55 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | #44 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
You're evaluating two property management systems: Counter by Counter, designed specifically for hostels, and HUGO by HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH, which is more of a website builder with some hotel support features. Both aim to streamline operations, but they target different hotel types and operational needs. Counter has a strong record in occupancy management, automation, and integrations, while HUGO emphasizes website performance and speed. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Counter offers a comprehensive PMS tailored for hostels, with a focus on booking management, automation, and integrations. HUGO, in contrast, is a website generator that can support hotel websites but has limited direct hotel management features. How important is a dedicated PMS versus website infrastructure for your property?
Counter is a dedicated PMS built explicitly for hostels and small hotels, providing tools for reservations, housekeeping, and revenue reporting. HUGO is primarily a website platform, optimized for fast, SEO-friendly pages, with limited hotel-specific operational features. If your hotel needs a full PMS, Counter is clearly designed for that purpose, whereas HUGO is more suited for creating a strong online presence.
Counter’s core strength is operational management, with features like channel management, booking engine, automated night audits, and guest CRM—features that are absent in HUGO’s offering. Conversely, HUGO excels at delivering high-performance websites that load quickly and rank well on search engines, but it does not cover the day-to-day management of guest reservations or property operations. So, are your main needs operational efficiency or online visibility?
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS capable of managing reservations, automating tasks, and integrating with third-party platforms, go with Counter. It’s the more proven solution, with over 54 reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
If your primary goal is to build a fast, SEO-optimized hotel website with minimal operational management, HUGO might be suitable—though it currently lacks reviews or ratings to support its effectiveness. For most hotels looking for operational support, Counter is the clear choice.
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating from 54 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and mobile accessibility. Many reviewers mention how quickly staff can learn and adopt the system, and its mobile-friendly design allows management from anywhere.
HUGO’s interface scores no ratings or reviews, so its ease of use cannot be reliably assessed. From the description, it’s a website generator rather than a management system, implying a steeper learning curve for hotel operations. Edge: Counter.
Counter provides 19 unique features, including channel management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and group functionality—tools essential for operational management. HUGO, on the other hand, offers a website builder focused on page speed and SEO, with no hotel-specific features listed.
Counter’s feature set directly addresses hotel management needs, while HUGO’s capabilities are more about content deployment. For hotel operations, Counter’s extensive PMS features give it a decisive edge.
Counter’s support ratings are exceptional at 4.96/5, with 54 reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Many users appreciate the responsiveness, especially during onboarding and technical issues.
HUGO has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, Counter's proven record makes it the safer pick. Edge: Counter.
Both systems integrate with seven verified partners. Counter’s integrations include popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, covering payments, channel management, and access control.
HUGO’s listed integrations include RateBoard, vioma, and others, but given its primary focus as a website generator, its integrations are less relevant for hotel operations. Counter’s broader integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable to hotel workflows. Edge: Counter.
Counter has a strong user base with 54 reviews, a 4.73/5 overall rating, and recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and excellent support. The Likelihood to Recommend stands at 91%, indicating high satisfaction among hotel users, mainly hostels.
HUGO has no reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction cannot be gauged. Based on available data, hoteliers rate Counter significantly higher. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not have publicly listed pricing but is described as offering a free, easy-to-use PMS specifically for hostels, suggesting affordability for small operators. HUGO also does not specify prices, focusing on its website hosting capabilities.
Given the lack of explicit pricing, your decision should consider whether you need a dedicated PMS (Counter) or a website builder (HUGO). For operational purposes, Counter’s value appears more tangible.
Counter is an established PMS tailored for hostels and small hotels, with extensive features, strong reviews, and excellent support. It addresses your core operational needs directly, with a proven track record of customer satisfaction.
HUGO is primarily a website generator that can help create fast-loading, SEO-friendly hotel sites but lacks hotel management features and user feedback. If your goal is operational efficiency, Counter is the clear choice.
Choose Counter if you want a solution that manages reservations, automates tasks, and integrates with your existing platforms. Opt for HUGO if your focus is on website performance and your hotel already has a management system in place. Ultimately, for most hoteliers, Counter offers the functionality and support required to run a successful property.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and HUGO share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and HUGO share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while HUGO offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. HUGO: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor