The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
isystems shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while isystems users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
isystems |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and isystems by isystems largely hinges on your property's needs and your operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Counter specifically targets hostels with a focus on intuitive, easy-to-use features, while isystems is geared toward property managers handling multiple property types with a broader suite of financial and operational tools. Your decision should consider the scale of your property, your team’s tech comfort, and your integration needs.
Counter has established itself as a top-rated PMS for hostels, boasting a high review count and recent positive feedback. Conversely, isystems, despite its comprehensive offering, lacks recent reviews or clear hotel-specific ratings, making Counter the more reliable choice today.
Counter’s primary strength lies in its focus on hostel management, offering features like channel management, booking engine, and housekeeping modules tailored for small to mid-sized hostels. It’s designed for simplicity, with an interface that loads easily on mobile browsers, making it ideal for hostel staff on the go.
isystems, on the other hand, caters to property managers overseeing multiple property types, including long-term rentals and real estate portfolios. Its interface appears less tailored for hospitality and more suited for property management at scale, emphasizing tenant communication and financial reporting.
Given Counter’s high overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 recent reviews, and isystems' lack of recent or hotel-focused reviews, Counter clearly holds more current, hotel-specific reputation. Does this mean Counter is better suited for your hotel? Likely, yes, if your focus is on hostel or small property management.
If your hotel is a hostel, boutique inn, or inn, Counter’s specific features like channel management, online booking, and guest CRM make it a natural fit. Its user-friendly design and mobile-friendly interface are ideal if your team values ease of use and quick onboarding, especially with staff who may not be highly tech-savvy.
Conversely, if your property management needs extend beyond front desk operations to include rent collection, tenant communication, maintenance, and financial oversight, isystems may be better suited. It’s designed for property management at a larger scale, with features supporting multi-property portfolios and detailed financial reporting.
For small, guest-focused properties, Counter’s focus on hospitality simplifies daily operations. Larger property portfolios or those requiring extensive financial management will find isystems’ broader management tools more aligned with their needs.
Counter’s interface scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its simplicity, intuitive layout, and quick staff onboarding. Hoteliers highlight its easy-to-understand calendar and management tools, making training new staff straightforward.
isystems, however, has no recent reviews or specific usability ratings available, which introduces uncertainty about its user experience. Its platform appears more complex, designed for property managers with multiple assets, possibly requiring more training and onboarding.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, group booking functionality, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features directly support small to mid-sized properties seeking automation and streamlined guest management.
isystems offers a broader suite of property management functions, including tenant communication, rent collection, maintenance requests, and financial reporting. Its feature set is geared toward real estate management, not specifically hospitality, and lacks the hotel-centric tools Counter provides.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support rating is outstanding at 4.96/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses from support staff like Evelyn and Max. Users frequently mention the responsiveness and professionalism of Counter’s team as a key advantage.
isystems provides no recent reviews or ratings, leaving a gap in current customer support assessment. Without recent, hotel-specific feedback, Counter’s support reputation clearly surpasses that of isystems.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, facilitating payments, channel management, and access control. These integrations are crucial for smooth operations and revenue flow.
isystems has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with third-party tools. For hoteliers seeking a PMS that can fit into an existing tech stack, Counter’s active integrations give it a distinct advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews, with a score of 4.73/5 and 54 recent reviews, indicate strong satisfaction among hostel and boutique hotel owners, particularly regarding ease of use and support. Hoteliers often cite its simplicity and efficiency as decisive factors.
isystems, lacking recent reviews, offers no current data on user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it’s clear hoteliers rate Counter higher.
Edge: Counter.
Neither Counter nor isystems disclose specific pricing publicly. They do not offer freemium plans, and no trial information is available, making precise comparisons difficult. Expect pricing to be tailored based on property size and feature requirements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter’s core strength lies in its targeted design for hostels and small hotels, with a focus on ease of use, automation, and guest management. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a reliable choice for properties seeking a straightforward PMS.
If your hotel needs a system that supports multi-property management, extensive financial reporting, and tenant functions, isystems may be suitable. However, its lack of recent reviews and hotel-specific features place it behind Counter in current hotel-focused evaluations.
For most hoteliers today, especially those managing hostels or boutique properties, Counter’s dedicated features, recent high ratings, and active support make it the better choice. Unless your property operates at a scale requiring complex real estate management, Counter is the recommended platform.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and isystems share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
isystems |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and isystems share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while isystems offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. isystems: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and isystems has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor