The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Lodging System shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Lodging System users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Lodging System
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Lodging System
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Lodging System
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Lodging System
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Lodging System hinges on your hotel’s priorities and operational needs. Counter is a SaaS PMS designed specifically for hostels and small properties, offering an extensive suite of features with a strong track record of user satisfaction. Lodging System, by contrast, positions itself as a broader hotel management platform with a variety of integrated tools but lacks recent reviews or high user ratings.
Given the current review landscape, Counter’s solid reputation, extensive feature set, and active user feedback make it the more reliable choice. Are you ready to see how these two platforms compare across key hotel management criteria?
Counter is a property management system built with hostels and small hotels in mind, offering a simplified, mobile-friendly interface that streamlines daily operations. Lodging System claims to be a comprehensive hotel platform, including PMS, CRM, POS, and channel management, but lacks recent user reviews to validate its performance.
Counter’s 54 reviews in the past six months, with a high overall rating of 4.73/5, reflect current user confidence and satisfaction. Lodging System has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess user experience or support quality. Do you want a proven, well-reviewed platform or a less documented alternative?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property needing an intuitive, easy-to-use PMS with strong channel management and automation features, Counter is the clear choice. Its dedicated focus on hostels means your team can quickly adapt, and your operations will benefit from automated tasks and integrated payments.
If your hotel requires an all-in-one platform with extensive tools like CRM, POS, and a booking engine, and you’re comfortable with limited recent feedback, Lodging System might seem attractive. However, without recent reviews, its reliability and user support remain uncertain. For most hoteliers, Counter offers a more tested and supported solution.
Counter’s UI has an average ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5, with users describing it as “simple,” “understandable,” and “easy to learn,” especially for staff onboarding. The onboarding experience scores 4.7/5, and users frequently mention the platform’s mobile friendliness and intuitive calendar view.
Lodging System lacks recent review data or ratings for ease of use, which raises concerns about how quickly your team could adopt it or navigate its features. Based on available information, Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features exclusive to its platform—like a channel manager, booking engine, online support, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency management—that are proven to help streamline hostel operations. It also provides modules for housekeeping, direct billing, group bookings, and ancillary revenue tracking.
Lodging System’s features include PMS, CRM, POS, channel distribution, and a booking engine, but without detailed counts or unique functionalities outlined in recent feedback. With a feature set tailored more toward hostels and small hotels, Counter’s specialized tools give it an edge. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team boasts a 4.96/5 rating based on user reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and quick problem resolution. Specific support team members like Evelyn and Max are frequently highlighted for their helpfulness.
Lodging System has no recent reviews or ratings available, leaving its support quality unverified. For hoteliers who prioritize responsive customer service, Counter’s proven support makes it the safer choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, Cloudbeds, and Goki, allowing you to connect with key revenue channels and access control systems. Its diverse integrations support automation and streamline operations across multiple platforms.
Lodging System offers no verified integrations or partner connections in the available data, which could limit your system’s flexibility and connectivity. For a hotel seeking seamless third-party integrations, Counter’s ecosystem makes it the better option. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend, reflect current hotelier confidence. Hoteliers across various segments, particularly hostels, consistently praise its usability, support, and automation.
Lodging System has no recent reviews or ratings, preventing a meaningful comparison. Given the current data, hoteliers clearly favor Counter. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list its pricing, but it offers a freemium model, with no implementation fees or monthly charges, making it accessible for small properties. Lodging System also lacks detailed pricing info, but its marketing emphasizes affordability.
Without concrete figures, your best bet is to contact both vendors directly. However, Counter’s free-to-start approach and flexible options make it more appealing for budget-conscious properties.
Not ideal if you require extensive customization for large chains or highly complex revenue management. Counter is best suited for small to mid-sized properties with a focus on operational simplicity.
Not ideal if your hotel relies on advanced revenue management, detailed reporting, or a proven support reputation. Lodging System may be suitable for hotels wanting an all-in-one system but lacking recent validation.
Counter is a well-reviewed, feature-rich PMS that serves hostels and small hotels effectively. Its recent high ratings, active support, and numerous integrations underscore its reliability.
Lodging System offers an integrated suite of tools but lacks current user feedback to confirm its performance or support quality. Unless your hotel’s needs are very specific and you’re comfortable with limited recent data, Counter remains the smarter choice.
For hoteliers seeking proven performance, active community feedback, and comprehensive features, Counter stands out as the recommended platform. If your focus is on an all-in-one solution with minimal evidence of recent success, Lodging System might be worth exploring further, but caution is advised.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Lodging System
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Lodging System share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Lodging System
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Lodging System share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Lodging System offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Lodging System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Lodging System has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor