The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Sphère Informatique shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Sphère Informatique users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Logiciel Chloe by Sphère Informatique hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter offers an all-in-one PMS tailored specifically for hostels, while Sphère Informatique's Chloe focuses on AI-driven property management, often for broader real estate portfolios. Your decision should reflect your property type, regional presence, and feature requirements.
Counter is a newer, more reviewed platform with a strong user base, especially among hostels. Conversely, Chloe’s lack of recent reviews and limited regional presence make it harder to evaluate confidently. So, which product suits your hotel best?
Counter is designed explicitly for hostel operators, with a focus on simplicity, ease of use, and operational automation. It supports features like channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and group bookings, all packed into a user-friendly interface.
Sphère Informatique’s Chloe, however, appears to target larger or more complex property portfolios with AI-enhanced features, but it offers no recent reviews or detailed feature insights. Its regional presence is limited to Europe, which may restrict its suitability for international hotels. Are you looking for a dedicated hostel PMS or a more versatile property management solution?
If your hotel operates primarily as a hostel or budget accommodation and needs straightforward management tools, Counter is the clear choice. It has 54 reviews, a 4.73/5 overall rating, and recent positive feedback emphasizing usability and support.
If your hotel manages a diverse property portfolio across regions and requires advanced AI analytics, Chloe might seem appealing. But without recent reviews or detailed feature comparisons, Counter's proven, highly-rated platform makes it the safer option for most hoteliers. Do you prioritize proven user satisfaction or emerging AI features?
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive, clean interface that simplifies daily operations. The onboarding process is rated 4.7/5, and users frequently mention how staff can quickly learn and adopt the system, even remotely.
Sphère Informatique offers no recent reviews, so its ease of use remains unverified. Without user feedback, it’s difficult to judge its UI or onboarding process. Based on available data, Counter’s user experience is clearly superior. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 19 unique features, including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, housekeepings, group functionality, and guest CRM, all tailored for hostel operations. It also supports multi-currency, multi-lingual management, and offers automated night audits.
Sphère Informatique provides no detailed feature list or unique functionalities. Its core strengths seem to lie in AI analytics rather than operational features. With a clearer feature set and proven capabilities, Counter leads in functionality. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviewers highlighting quick, professional, and helpful responses. Specific praise goes to team members like Evelyn and Max for their responsiveness, though some concerns about support timeliness in certain time zones exist.
Sphère Informatique has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given Counter’s high ratings and recent positive feedback, it is the safer choice for reliable support. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers integrations with 7 verified partners, including popular options like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and Goki, with a channel manager that connects to multiple OTAs. Its integrations streamline payments, access control, and channel distribution.
Sphère Informatique connects with 11 partners, including Customer Alliance, Lighthouse, and RoomCloud, but lacks detailed information on the scope of integrations. Counter’s established integrations and partner network make it more adaptable for most hotels. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 reviews reveal a strong overall rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews are recent, mainly from hostel operators, emphasizing ease of use, support, and automation.
Sphère Informatique has zero recent reviews, preventing evaluation of user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, Counter’s proven satisfaction levels are the clear leader. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not list specific pricing but is known for a flexible, no-cost trial and no implementation fees, suggesting a transparent pricing model. Sphère Informatique’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates direct comparison.
Given the transparency and absence of fees for Counter, it presents a more predictable investment. If budget clarity is crucial, Counter is the more accessible choice.
Counter is ideal for small to medium hostels, with simple operational needs and a focus on ease of use.
Sphère Informatique suits larger property portfolios and real estate managers looking for AI-driven features.
Counter is a dedicated hostel PMS with a focus on simplicity, automation, and strong support, making it ideal for small to medium hostels. Its broad regional presence and feature set provide confidence in its operational capabilities.
Sphère Informatique offers AI-driven tools tailored for complex property management but lacks recent reviews, making its effectiveness uncertain for hotels. Its limited regional reach further restricts its suitability for international properties.
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly PMS with robust features and support, Counter is the clear choice. Choose Sphère Informatique if your portfolio demands AI analytics and you operate within Europe, understanding that review data is limited.
In summary, for most hoteliers, especially those running hostels or small properties, Counter’s established track record, features, and recent reviews make it the better fit. Sphère Informatique’s offerings may appeal to larger, regionally concentrated property owners seeking AI insights, but the lack of recent feedback warrants caution before investing.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Logiciel Chloe share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Logiciel Chloe share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Logiciel Chloe offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Logiciel Chloe: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Sphère Informatique has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor