The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Libra Hospitality shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Libra Hospitality users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Logus by Libra Hospitality hinges on what your hotel needs most. Counter, with its extensive review history and recent high ratings, is a well-established PMS tailored for hostels and small properties. Logus, by contrast, lacks recent reviews and a significant user base, making it harder to evaluate its current performance.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Counter’s proven track record makes it the safer choice if you prioritize reliability. Do your hotel’s priorities lean towards a platform with a strong user base and proven success? Let’s compare the two more closely.
Counter is a property management system with over 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, emphasizing ease of use, customer support, and value for money. In contrast, Logus currently has zero reviews and a score of 0, which means its real-world performance remains unverified.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, fast support, and a solid feature set tailored for hostels—making it a trusted option. Logus’s lack of user feedback makes it difficult to assess its usability or effectiveness, leaving your team to rely on vendor claims alone. Are you comfortable trusting an unreviewed platform?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or budget accommodation where quick onboarding and cost-effectiveness are critical, Counter is the clear choice. Its free model and high review volume indicate a platform that’s mature, reliable, and widely adopted in your segment.
If your hotel requires a more enterprise-level solution with extensive customization and integration capabilities, and you are willing to adopt a less proven platform, Logus might appeal. However, given the absence of recent reviews or evidence of active use, Counter’s proven performance makes it the more dependable option now.
For hoteliers seeking a platform with a track record of positive reviews and active support, Counter is the definitive recommendation.
Counter scores 4.6/5 on ease of use, with reviews praising its simple, clean interface that’s friendly to staff training. Support for onboarding is rated at 4.7/5, with users noting the responsiveness of team members like Evelyn and Max.
Logus’s UI and usability ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews provide insights into its user experience. Without concrete feedback, it’s uncertain how easy Logus is to learn and adopt.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, payment processing, booking engine, calendar view, guest CRM, multi-currency, and automated night audit. These tools cater directly to hostel needs, streamlining operations from reservations to revenue tracking.
Logus does not currently list specific features or unique functionalities, making it impossible to compare feature depth or breadth. Based on available data, Counter’s feature set is clearly more robust and tailored to hostel management.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is rated at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses. Customers frequently mention how the support team—especially staff like Evelyn and Max—goes above and beyond to assist, even amid system bugs.
Logus lacks recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. When choosing a platform that your team can rely on for help, Counter’s proven responsiveness is a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, Goki, and Cloudbeds. These integrations cover channel management, payment processing, and other operational tools.
Logus has only 2 verified integrations, with HKeeper and Hotellab, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels that depend on multiple platforms and third-party tools, Counter provides more flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s 54 recent reviews yield a high rating of 4.73/5, with many users from the hostel segment praising its ease of use and customer support. Bed & Breakfasts and independent hotels rate it around 4.75/5, indicating strong satisfaction.
Logus, with no recent reviews, cannot be rated by users. Its unknown reception makes it impossible to determine how different property types perceive its value.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not specify pricing publicly, but no free trial or freemium model is available, suggesting a custom quote based on your property size. Its value is reflected in high customer satisfaction and comprehensive features.
Logus’s pricing is also unavailable, which complicates cost comparisons. However, the lack of transparent pricing and reviews makes Counter’s existing value proposition clearer.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization beyond hostel management or advanced revenue analytics.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a trusted vendor with a large user base or proven track record.
Counter is a mature, user-rated PMS with extensive features, proven support, and a global presence. Its reviews show a high level of satisfaction, especially among hostel operators, making it a dependable choice.
Logus remains untested by the user community, with no recent reviews or demonstrated performance. Its lack of public feedback and limited integrations suggest it’s an unproven entry into the PMS market.
For hoteliers wanting a secure, well-supported platform, Counter is the clear winner. If you are willing to risk less-tested options and require deep integration capabilities, Logus could be worth exploring, but only with caution.
In conclusion: Counter’s review-backed reliability and feature set make it the recommended choice for most hotels today. Logus’s absence of recent feedback and limited integration options make it a less favorable option at this stage.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Logus by Libra Hospitality share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Logus by Libra Hospitality share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Logus by Libra Hospitality offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Logus by Libra Hospitality: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Libra Hospitality has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor