The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Mister Booking shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Mister Booking users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Mister Booking requires understanding the core problems each solves. Counter is a dedicated property management system tailored for hostels, offering extensive features and a strong reputation backed by recent reviews. Mister Booking, by contrast, presents itself as a broader booking and operations platform, but with no recent reviews or user feedback, its reliability remains uncertain.
Counter excels in usability, support, and regional presence, making it the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing ease and support. However, Mister Booking may appeal if you're seeking an integrated system that covers multiple property types, though its lack of recent reviews casts doubt on current performance.
Counter is built specifically for hostel operators, focusing on simplicity, automation, and operational efficiency, making it ideal for small and medium hostels seeking a straightforward PMS. Mister Booking claims to streamline hotel, resort, and vacation rental management but offers no recent user reviews or measurable ratings, which makes assessing its effectiveness difficult.
Counter's recent reviews underline its high user satisfaction, especially in ease of use (4.6/5) and support (4.96/5). Mister Booking, however, lacks recent feedback entirely, leaving hoteliers unsure of its current functionality or customer service. Are you comfortable choosing a system without recent user validation?
The primary divergence is Counter’s proven track record with 54 recent reviews and a stellar overall rating of 4.73/5, versus Mister Booking’s absence of recent feedback. Do you want a trusted, reviewed system or are you willing to take a gamble on an unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a reliable PMS that integrates channel management, payment processing, and guest CRM functionalities in one platform, Counter is the clear choice. Its well-established presence among hostels, with a 91% recommendation rate and recent reviews, demonstrates its effectiveness.
If your operations span multiple property types and you're seeking a system that claims to cover broader hospitality management, Mister Booking might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews, no ratings, and no verifiable customer feedback, it’s difficult to justify over Counter.
For hotels prioritizing proven support, ease of use, and extensive feature sets, Counter is the safer, smarter option. Conversely, if you’re an innovator willing to risk unverified solutions, Mister Booking might warrant further investigation—but only with caution.
Counter boasts an impressive ease of use rating of 4.6/5, backed by 54 recent reviews from users who describe its interface as "clear, simple and easy to understand." Users frequently highlight how quickly staff can learn and operate Counter, with many praising its mobile-friendly design and intuitive calendar view.
In contrast, Mister Booking’s user experience is unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, leaving hoteliers unsure about its interface quality or onboarding process. Their absence of recent data makes it impossible to assess usability confidently.
Edge: Counter. Its high ratings and positive feedback on onboarding, staff training, and interface clarity make it the more user-friendly choice for your team.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency, and ancillary revenue tracking—features most hoteliers find essential. Mister Booking, however, provides no publicly available feature list, and no verified features are documented.
Counter’s comprehensive suite, especially its integrated channel management and POS system, makes it a versatile tool for hostels and small hotels. Mister Booking’s lack of verifiable features leaves its capabilities in question, making Counter the more reliable and complete solution.
Edge: Counter. Its extensive feature set, including unique modules like group functionality and cloud-based management, surpasses the unknown scope of Mister Booking.
Counter’s support team scores a 4.96/5 based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and quick resolution times. Specific praise is directed toward team members Evelyn and Max, who are described as "always reachable" and "helpful" in troubleshooting.
Mister Booking has no recent reviews or support ratings available, rendering its customer service reputation uncertain. Without recent feedback, you risk relying on a support system that has not been validated.
Edge: Counter. Its high customer support rating and recent positive reviews demonstrate its commitment to assisting users effectively.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including prominent platforms like WuBook, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki, covering channel management, online payments, and access control. These integrations are frequently praised for streamlining operations and consolidating income sources.
Mister Booking offers no publicly verified integrations, and with zero verified partners, its ability to connect with other systems remains unproven. This limits its utility in a multi-platform environment.
Edge: Counter. Its confirmed integrations provide operational flexibility and ease of use, unlike Mister Booking’s unverified ecosystem.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in 6 months) showcase a high rating of 4.73/5 and a recommendation rate of 91%. Users across segments, especially hostels, highlight its simplicity, support, and automation as key strengths.
Mister Booking, lacking any recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to determine how hotelier perceptions currently stand.
Edge: Counter. Its substantial recent review base and high ratings establish it as the more trusted, well-regarded platform among hoteliers.
Counter does not list explicit pricing but is described as a free PMS tailored for hostels, with no implementation fees, freemium options, or monthly charges. Its value lies in its features and support, which are highly rated.
Mister Booking also lacks detailed pricing information, and with no recent reviews, its cost structure remains unknown. This obscurity complicates direct comparisons of value.
In summary, both platforms’ pricing models are not transparent, but Counter’s free approach for hostel management makes it more accessible.
Not ideal if your property requires complex revenue management, extensive multi-property features, or advanced customization that Counter currently does not fully support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions where Mister Booking’s regional support or integrations are limited, or if you prefer platforms with established, recent user feedback.
Counter’s core advantage is its proven track record, extensive feature set, and high user satisfaction. Its focus on hostels and small hotels, combined with recent reviews, make it a dependable choice for properties seeking simplicity, automation, and support.
Mister Booking presents itself as a broad management platform but offers no recent validation of its performance or features. Without current reviews or verified integrations, it remains an unconfirmed option—potentially risky for your hotel’s operations.
If your hotel values reliability, support, and a proven feature set, Counter is the clear winner. If you’re exploring untested systems with broader ambitions, Mister Booking might be worth a cautious trial—though recent user feedback suggests it’s not yet a mature solution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Mister Booking |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Mister Booking share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Mister Booking |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Mister Booking share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Mister Booking offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Mister Booking: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Mister Booking has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor