The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Modotel shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Modotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Modotel |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on understanding what each product offers and how well they align with your operational needs. Counter by Counter, with its focus on hostels and small properties, provides a suite of features tailored for simplicity and automation. Modotel PMS, on the other hand, appears less established, with no recent reviews or detailed feature data, making Counter the more reliable choice based on current evidence.
Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter's comprehensive suite and large user base suggest it’s better suited for your hotel's needs. Does your property require a proven, feature-rich system, or are you exploring options without current user feedback?
Counter is an all-in-one PMS designed specifically for hostels and small hotels, offering features like channel management, payment processing, booking engines, and guest CRM. Modotel PMS lacks detailed documentation and recent reviews, raising questions about its current usability and support. Counter boasts a 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 recent reviews, while Modotel has no recent ratings or user feedback available, making Counter the clearer choice for reliability.
Counter's recent reviews highlight its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and responsive customer support, making it easier for your team to adopt. Conversely, Modotel’s lack of recent feedback prevents a reliable comparison, but its absence from recent review channels suggests limited current market presence. Are you willing to risk adopting a product without recent validation?
If your hotel operates mainly in Europe, North America, or Asia Pacific, and needs a trusted PMS with proven features, Counter is the clear pick. It is especially ideal if you manage hostels, boutique, or city center hotels, where ease of use and automation matter most.
Choose Modotel if you seek a system with potentially custom features or regional-specific solutions, but be aware that it currently lacks recent reviews and verified integrations. For most hoteliers looking for certainty, Counter’s extensive feature set, regional presence, and positive recent reviews make it the stronger option.
Counter is rated 4.6/5 for ease of use, with a highly intuitive interface praised for its simplicity and mobile accessibility. Its onboarding process scores 4.7/5, with users describing it as straightforward, quick, and easy to train staff on. Support from Counter is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers mentioning fast, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max.
Modotel’s user experience is unassessed publicly, and no recent reviews or user ratings are available to gauge its usability. Given Counter’s high ratings and active support, it clearly outperforms Modotel on ease of use. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features including channel management, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are absent in Modotel’s profile, which provides no detailed feature list or comparison data. Counter’s rich feature set, especially for hostels and small properties, gives it a significant edge.
Modotel’s lack of available feature details and recent updates suggests it may be limited or outdated. For hotels seeking a comprehensive, tested platform, Counter’s extensive features and integrations make it the better choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter scores an impressive 4.96/5 in customer support, with recent reviews mentioning quick, helpful responses and professional support staff like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate the ongoing improvements and responsive service, even amid some bugs, which are actively being addressed.
Modotel’s customer support ratings and recent review data are unavailable, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without recent user feedback, Counter’s proven high support score makes it the safer, more dependable option. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including industry-leading channel managers (SiteMinder, Cloudbeds), payment processors (Stripe), and platform tools (WuBook, Goki). These integrations help streamline operations and expand your online reach.
Modotel provides no verified integrations or partner data, limiting its connectivity options. For a hotel wanting a flexible, well-integrated PMS, Counter’s established ecosystem offers clear advantages. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews show a 4.75/5 rating across 52 reviews from diverse property types, primarily hostels, which comprise 83% of its user base. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and automation, indicating high satisfaction levels.
Modotel has no recent reviews or ratings available, preventing a meaningful comparison. Given Counter’s proven user satisfaction and recent feedback, it’s the stronger choice for hoteliers seeking peer validation. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly list pricing, but its model suggests a paid, subscription-based service without a free tier. Its value comes from its robust features and support, which many users consider worth the investment.
Modotel’s pricing is also undisclosed, with no recent data or public quotes available. Without transparent pricing, and given Counter’s proven value, Counter offers a clearer picture of what your hotel should expect to pay.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter is a proven, feature-rich PMS with high user satisfaction, extensive integrations, and recent positive reviews, making it the clear choice for most hotels. Modotel, lacking recent feedback and detailed feature data, remains an uncertain option—better suited for properties with specific niche needs or regional requirements.
If your priority is operational reliability, ease of use, and proven support, Counter is the definitive choice. It’s especially suited for hostels and small hotels aiming for automation and simplicity over customization.
Choose Counter if you want a trusted, well-supported platform backed by recent reviews and a broad ecosystem. Turn to Modotel only if you have specific regional needs and are prepared for the risk of limited support and uncertain current features.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision-making process based on current market evidence and user feedback. For most hoteliers, Counter stands out as the more dependable, feature-rich, and supported PMS, aligning well with your operational goals.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Modotel PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Modotel PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Modotel PMS offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Modotel PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Modotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor