The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Passpartout shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Passpartout users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Passpartout by Passpartout boils down to core functionalities, user satisfaction, and regional presence. Counter, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, clearly dominates in terms of hotel-specific features and hotelier trust. Passpartout’s limited reviews and lack of recent user feedback make it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or fit for your property. Do you want a proven, hotel-focused PMS with a strong track record, or are you exploring an untested platform?
Counter aims to serve hostels, boutique hotels, and small to medium properties with an intuitive interface and a broad feature set. Passpartout appears to target a wider property management niche, but its lack of reviews and regional presence raises questions. Which platform aligns better with your operational needs and customer base?
Counter’s strengths lie in its well-rounded hotel management capabilities, boasting 54 reviews with a 4.73 out of 5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, excellent customer support, and useful automation features, especially for hostels. Conversely, Passpartout has zero reviews, no recent feedback, and no discernible hotel-specific features, making it impossible to determine its suitability or effectiveness.
Counter’s review count and recent feedback provide a clear picture of user satisfaction, while Passpartout’s lack of data leaves hoteliers guessing about reliability and feature set. Do you prefer a platform with proven results and ongoing support, or are you willing to gamble on an unverified system?
If your hotel requires a reliable PMS with strong review support, robust booking and channel management, and automation features, Counter is the clear choice. It’s especially suited for hostels and small hotels that need straightforward, mobile-friendly management tools. If your hotel needs a scalable, AI-driven platform with advanced analytics and automation for larger or more complex properties, Passpartout could be appealing—though its lack of reviews and market presence makes it a risky bet.
Counter’s extensive integrations with platforms like Stripe, SiteMinder, and Goki, plus its multiple region coverage, make it more versatile for global operations. Passpartout’s undefined feature set and zero verified partners mean you’re essentially evaluating an unproven product.
Counter’s interface scores a 4.6 out of 5 on ease of use, and reviews consistently praise its simplicity and quick staff onboarding. Hoteliers find onboarding straightforward with a well-designed mobile and desktop experience, making daily management easier. In contrast, Passpartout has no user reviews or ratings, so there is no data to assess its usability or onboarding process.
Based on Counter’s high ratings and positive feedback, your team will likely adopt the system faster, reducing training time and operational disruptions. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeepings modules, guest CRM, multi-currency, and automated night audits. These tools directly address daily hotel operations, allowing for holistic management. Passpartout does not disclose its features, and with no verified integrations or modules, it’s impossible to compare feature depth.
Counter’s feature-rich platform supports operational automation and revenue tracking, giving your team more control. Passpartout’s lack of transparency makes it a gamble—unless you need a very specific, AI-driven solution that isn’t yet proven.
Counter’s customer support scores a 4.96 out of 5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Hoteliers value the responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Passpartout provides no publicly available support ratings, reviews, or feedback, leaving its support quality unverified.
If support quality influences your decision, Counter’s proven track record and recent reviews suggest you’ll receive prompt assistance. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, and payment platforms like Stripe. These integrations enable streamlined operations across multiple platforms, making it easier to manage bookings, payments, and access control. Passpartout has no listed verified integrations, which could limit its compatibility with your existing infrastructure.
Having more integrations ensures your hotel can connect with the tools you already use, reducing manual work. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s hotelier reviews are recent and plentiful, with an overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews, mostly praising ease of use, support, and automation. Hotels across segments like hostels and boutique hotels rate it highly, with many reviews citing operational efficiency and smooth onboarding. Passpartout, with no reviews, cannot provide any property ratings or feedback, leaving its reputation unverified.
Considering the volume and recency of reviews, hoteliers clearly prefer Counter. Its high rating and positive feedback demonstrate its real-world effectiveness. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not disclose specific pricing but is known to be a paid system with no free tier or trial. Passpartout similarly offers no pricing details, making direct comparison impossible. Both platforms likely require a custom quote based on your property size and needs.
Given Counter’s established pricing model and transparent reviews, you can budget accordingly. Passpartout’s unclear pricing means you’ll need to inquire directly, adding uncertainty to your decision.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on complex revenue management, detailed group booking features, or regional OTA integrations not supported.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven, hotel-specific features, or if you require extensive regional integrations and support.
Counter offers a well-rounded, hotel-focused PMS with a proven track record, high ratings, and strong customer support. Its extensive features, integrations, and regional presence make it suitable for various property types, especially hostels and boutique hotels. Passpartout remains unreviewed, unproven, and lacks critical hotel-specific features, making it a risky choice without further validation.
If you value reliability, user satisfaction, and operational support backed by recent reviews, Counter is the clear winner. Choose Passpartout only if your hotel specifically needs its AI-driven approach and you’re willing to accept the unknowns. For most hoteliers, Counter provides a safer, more effective solution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Passpartout |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Passpartout share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Passpartout |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Passpartout share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Passpartout offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Passpartout: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Passpartout has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor