The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
CEI Europe shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while CEI Europe users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s daily operations and guest satisfaction. Counter by Counter and Quohotel PMS by CEI Europe both aim to streamline processes, but they diverge sharply in maturity, user feedback, and market presence. While Counter boasts a strong track record with extensive reviews and recent updates, CEI Europe remains less proven in the field. How do these differences influence your decision?
Counter provides a comprehensive, hostelry-focused platform with robust features and a large user base, especially among hostels. CEI Europe, however, offers a broader suite of functionalities suitable for various hotel types but lacks recent user validation. Does your hotel prioritize proven reliability and active support, or are you seeking a more expansive, albeit less tested, solution?
Counter by Counter and CEI Europe both aim to facilitate hotel management, yet Counter’s edge lies in its proven track record and active user community. With a score of 16.52 and over 50 recent reviews—most from hostels—Counter’s reputation is bolstered by a 4.73/5 rating and an NPS of 9.02/5, reflecting high satisfaction. Conversely, CEI Europe’s review count is zero, and its overall score is absent, leaving its reliability in question.
Counter excels in ease of use, customer support, and feature depth, making it a compelling choice for properties that value proven performance. CEI Europe, while promising, suffers from a lack of recent feedback, which complicates assessing its actual capabilities. Are you comfortable adopting a system with limited recent validation, or do you prefer one with consistent, positive user experiences?
If your hotel is a hostel or a small property seeking a user-friendly, well-rated PMS, Counter by Counter is the clear choice. Its dedicated focus on hostels, combined with high ratings (4.73/5), extensive features, and active support, makes it ideal for properties prioritizing simplicity and reliability.
If your hotel needs a broad, potentially scalable system capable of managing diverse operations beyond hostels—such as billing, housekeeping, and detailed reporting—CEI Europe might appeal. However, the lack of recent reviews and demonstrated user satisfaction makes Counter the safer, more proven option. For most hoteliers, especially in the hostel segment, Counter offers a more dependable investment.
Counter’s interface receives a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating based on user feedback, emphasizing its intuitive design, mobile compatibility, and straightforward calendar management. Users praise the platform for its simplicity, noting that staff members can learn it quickly, leading to faster onboarding, with an onboarding rating of 4.7/5.
CEI Europe, lacking recent reviews, offers no current usability data. Without modern user feedback, it’s difficult to assess whether its interface matches Counter’s usability standards. Given the detailed positive comments on Counter’s user-friendly design, edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 distinct features, including channel management, online booking, automated night audits, guest CRM, multi-currency support, payment processing, and group management—features not present in CEI Europe’s offering. Its focus on hostel-specific needs, like housekeeper modules and ancillary revenue tracking, further enhances its appeal.
CEI Europe’s feature set remains unspecified beyond core reservation management, with no unique capabilities highlighted. Without comparable feature data, Counter’s broader and more tailored functionality makes it the superior choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support scores are outstanding at 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting quick, responsive, and helpful service. Users frequently mention specific team members, like Evelyn and Max, who deliver prompt assistance, even amid bugs or system issues.
CEI Europe provides no recent review data or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given Counter’s proven, highly-rated support team, edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including major platforms like WuBook, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds, providing extensive connectivity for channel management, payments, and access control. Its integrations support multi-platform operation, essential for dynamic hotel environments.
CEI Europe’s single verified partner is Duetto, a revenue management system. While functional, this limits its integration breadth compared to Counter’s ecosystem. For hotels needing flexible, multi-channel operations, edge: Counter.
Counter’s large base of 54 reviews, with a 4.73/5 overall rating, indicates strong satisfaction, especially among hostel properties which rate it 4.75/5. Recent reviews praise its usability, support, and automation.
CEI Europe has no recent reviews or ratings, so current user satisfaction remains unverified. Based on available data, Counter’s higher and recent ratings make it the preferred option. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s pricing details are not publicly available; it does not offer a freemium model or trial, which suggests a tailored quote might be necessary. Its value is reflected in its extensive features and proven support.
CEI Europe also lacks detailed pricing information and offers no free tier or trials. Without transparent costs, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, given Counter’s established reputation and feature set, it generally provides a stronger investment.
Counter by Counter stands out as the more reliable, feature-rich, and user-approved PMS, especially for hostels and small hotels. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations make it a safe choice for hoteliers seeking stability and support.
CEI Europe offers a potentially versatile platform but suffers from a lack of recent user validation, limiting confidence in its current capabilities. It might suit larger, tech-savvy hotels willing to experiment, but for most, Counter provides more certainty.
If your priority is a proven system with active support, extensive features, and a strong user base, go with Counter. If you’re exploring broader functionalities and are comfortable with less immediate validation, consider CEI Europe.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers, particularly those in the hostel segment, Counter by Counter is the more trustworthy and tested option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
CEI Europe |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Quohotel PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Quohotel PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Quohotel PMS offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Quohotel PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and CEI Europe has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor