Counter vs. Tesipro: Which Is Right for You?

Updated May 15, 2026  ·  57 verified reviews analyzed

TLDR

We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.

Tesipro shines , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does Counter Compare to Tesipro?

Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

HTScore
17
0
Likelihood to Recommend
91%
0%
Ease of Use
4.6/5
0.0/5
Customer Support
4.9/5
0.0/5
Value for Money
4.8/5
0.0/5
Starting Price Contact sales From $1,300/mo
Verified Reviews 57 0

What Are the Pros and Cons of Counter vs Tesipro?

After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Tesipro users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
Pros
+ User interface and usability
+ Customer support
+ Automated features
+ Platform integration
Cons
Bug issues
Reporting and revenue management
Pricing

Counter vs Tesipro: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
Small (10-24 rooms) #26 28 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #46 4 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) #32 2 reviews
X-Large (200+ rooms) #31 1 reviews

By Property Type

Segment Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
Boutique #31 16 reviews
Luxury #44 4 reviews
Branded / Chain #43 4 reviews
Extended Stay #32 5 reviews

By Region

Segment Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
North America #25 8 reviews
Europe #20 25 reviews
Asia Pacific #16 4 reviews
Middle East #11 2 reviews

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and Tesipro by Tesipro hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter focuses on simplicity and ease of use for hostels, while Tesipro offers a broader suite of features suited for larger, more complex properties.

Counter excels in its user-friendly design, quick onboarding, and strong support, making it an ideal choice for small to mid-sized hostels. Tesipro, on the other hand, provides extensive features for full-service hotels and chains, but its lack of recent reviews and lower ratings make it a less reliable option right now.

Is Counter or Tesipro Better for Hotels?

Counter’s core advantage is its dedicated focus on hostels, with a straightforward interface that staff can learn fast. Tesipro aims at larger establishments needing extensive integrations and modules, but it has zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current performance and user experience.

Counter is built around ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating for usability and over 50 reviews, most recent from the last six months, indicating current active users. Tesipro’s absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it keeps pace with modern hotel management needs, but its feature set suggests a focus on larger operations.

The key difference lies in their target audiences: Counter is designed for small, independent properties like hostels, while Tesipro caters to bigger hotels and chains. Would your team benefit most from a simple, reliable PMS or a comprehensive, scalable platform? That’s the core of their divergence.

Counter vs Tesipro: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a hostel or small property that prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and responsive customer support, Counter is your better choice. It’s especially beneficial if your team needs to manage check-ins, bookings, and payments from mobile devices on the go, supported by a 4.96/5 support rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend.

Conversely, if your property is a large hotel or chain with complex operations requiring advanced modules like EPoS, integrated CRS, shift planning, and real-time reporting, Tesipro’s extensive feature list makes it appealing. But without recent reviews, you should consider whether the platform’s current performance matches its feature promise.

For hoteliers focused on hostels or small independent hotels seeking simplicity, Counter’s reputation and recent user feedback clearly favor it. Larger properties with the need for extensive integrations and modules might lean toward Tesipro, but caution is advised given the lack of recent feedback.

Is Counter or Tesipro Easier to Use?

Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Hoteliers emphasize how fast staff can be trained and how seamlessly the system integrates into daily operations, with support from responsive team members like Evelyn and Max.

Tesipro’s usability data is unavailable, and its lack of recent reviews leaves its ease of use uncertain. Larger, complex systems often come with steeper learning curves, and without current feedback, it’s hard to gauge whether Tesipro has addressed usability issues.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter offers 16 shared features with Tesipro, plus three exclusive modules: guest CRM, guest profiles, and ancillary revenue tracking. Tesipro’s 28 unique features include specialized modules like Spa & Wellness, EPoS, task management, digital registration, and real-time status updates—ideal for full-service hotels.

Counter’s features are more basic, fitting small properties that need core functionalities. Tesipro’s extensive modules support larger, complex operations but may be excessive for smaller properties. Ultimately, if you need a broad feature set, Tesipro wins; if simplicity suffices, Counter is better.

Edge: Tesipro.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Specific mentions include quick replies from team members like Evelyn and Max, reinforcing confidence in their service.

Tesipro’s support reputation and recent reviews are absent, making it difficult to compare support quality. For hotel operators relying on reliable support, Counter’s current high ratings are a decisive advantage.

Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter connects with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and WuBook. Tesipro’s 25 verified partners include major industry players such as Cendyn, RateGain, and Nonius, offering broader connectivity.

While Tesipro’s extensive integrations may appeal to larger properties needing multiple system linkages, Counter’s strategic integrations are sufficient for small to mid-sized hostels, offering streamlined operations. For your needs, the breadth of integrations in Tesipro might be overkill unless you operate at a larger scale.

Edge: Tesipro.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or Tesipro?

Counter’s recent reviews (54 reviews, last six months) reflect an average rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Hoteliers in the hostel segment highlight its ease of use, quick support, and reliability.

Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, so we cannot determine current user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it clearly holds the higher rating among current users.

Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and Tesipro Cost?

Counter does not publicly disclose a pricing model, but it is known to be a free, no-implementation-fee PMS tailored for hostels. Tesipro’s base price starts at $1,300, but there’s no mention of ongoing monthly fees or customizable options.

Counter’s free model makes it accessible for small properties, whereas Tesipro’s cost may be justifiable for larger operations needing its extensive modules. However, the lack of current pricing details for Tesipro warrants caution.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

  • Hotels that operate as hostels or small independent properties with simple management needs.
  • Teams seeking a mobile-friendly, easy-to-learn platform to manage guest bookings and check-ins.
  • Facilities prioritizing quick onboarding with minimal training time.
  • Businesses that need automated payment processing and integrations with POS systems.
  • Hotels that operate in regions where a free, reliable PMS is advantageous.

Not ideal if your property requires multiple complex modules like spa management, detailed revenue analysis, or extensive integrations with large OTAs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Tesipro?

  • Larger hotels and hotel groups with complex operational requirements.
  • Properties needing extensive modules such as EPoS, shift planning, real-time reporting, and integrated CRS.
  • Teams that want to centralize multiple functions like guest management, task management, and digital registration.
  • Hotels operating in markets where a broad ecosystem of integrations and advanced features are necessary.
  • Properties with resources to implement and maintain a more sophisticated PMS.

Not ideal if your property is small, independent, or prioritizes a simple, cost-effective management solution.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter’s core strength lies in its simplicity, active user base, and recent high ratings. It’s perfect for hostels and small properties that need an intuitive, reliable PMS without the complexity or cost of larger systems.

Tesipro offers a broad array of features but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, making its current performance uncertain. It’s suited for large, complex hotels and chains that can benefit from its extensive modules, assuming its platform remains as robust as advertised.

If your property’s operational focus is on ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the clear choice. For full-scale hotel management with advanced features, Tesipro could be suitable—if it delivers on its promises today.

In conclusion, given the current data, Counter is the stronger option due to its active user reviews, higher ratings, and proven support. Consider Tesipro only if your hotel has the resources to explore its extensive capabilities and can verify ongoing platform stability.


Note: This analysis is based on available reviews, feature comparisons, and product descriptions as of October 2023. Always verify with the vendor for up-to-date details.

How Much Do Counter and Tesipro Cost?

Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
Starting Price From $1,300/mo

Which Features Does Counter Have That Tesipro Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, Counter and Tesipro share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature Counter Counter Tesipro Tesipro
Ancillary revenue tracking
EPoS
Guest CRM
Guest CRM
Guest profiles
Guest profiles
Integrated CRS
Spa & Wellness Module
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)

Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.

Counter vs Tesipro: The Bottom Line

Counter
Counter
4.6/5 from 57 reviews

What hoteliers love

User interface and usability 83% positive

Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.

Customer support 98% positive

The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.

Automated features 83% positive

Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.

Where hoteliers push back

Bug issues 86% negative

Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.

Reporting and revenue management 50% negative

Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.

Unique capabilities

Guest CRM Guest profiles Ancillary revenue tracking
4.6/5 ease of use 5.0/5 support 7 integrations
Visit Profile
Tesipro
Tesipro
0.0/5 from 0 reviews

Unique capabilities

Spa & Wellness Module Integrated CRS Guest CRM Guest profiles EPoS
0.0/5 ease of use 0.0/5 support 25 integrations
Visit Profile

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Ease of Use Counter 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Customer Support Counter 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
Value for Money Counter 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
Onboarding Counter 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

Frequently Asked Questions About Counter vs Tesipro

Can Counter replace Tesipro?

It depends on your requirements. Counter and Tesipro share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Tesipro offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do Counter or Tesipro offer a free plan?

Counter: No. Tesipro: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Counter and Tesipro?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Tesipro has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group Weight What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews

How highly do users recommend this product?

Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories

The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.

Partner Ecosystem

How highly do tech partners recommend this company?

Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality

Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.

Customer Centricity

How customer-centric is this organization?

Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness

Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.

Reach, Staying Power & Resources

How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing?

Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score

Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →

Get personalized product recommendations

Product recommendations advisor

Ghostel icon

Let´s lookup your hotel information