The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Tesipro shines , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Tesipro users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Tesipro by Tesipro hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter focuses on simplicity and ease of use for hostels, while Tesipro offers a broader suite of features suited for larger, more complex properties.
Counter excels in its user-friendly design, quick onboarding, and strong support, making it an ideal choice for small to mid-sized hostels. Tesipro, on the other hand, provides extensive features for full-service hotels and chains, but its lack of recent reviews and lower ratings make it a less reliable option right now.
Counter’s core advantage is its dedicated focus on hostels, with a straightforward interface that staff can learn fast. Tesipro aims at larger establishments needing extensive integrations and modules, but it has zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current performance and user experience.
Counter is built around ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating for usability and over 50 reviews, most recent from the last six months, indicating current active users. Tesipro’s absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it keeps pace with modern hotel management needs, but its feature set suggests a focus on larger operations.
The key difference lies in their target audiences: Counter is designed for small, independent properties like hostels, while Tesipro caters to bigger hotels and chains. Would your team benefit most from a simple, reliable PMS or a comprehensive, scalable platform? That’s the core of their divergence.
If your hotel is a hostel or small property that prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and responsive customer support, Counter is your better choice. It’s especially beneficial if your team needs to manage check-ins, bookings, and payments from mobile devices on the go, supported by a 4.96/5 support rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend.
Conversely, if your property is a large hotel or chain with complex operations requiring advanced modules like EPoS, integrated CRS, shift planning, and real-time reporting, Tesipro’s extensive feature list makes it appealing. But without recent reviews, you should consider whether the platform’s current performance matches its feature promise.
For hoteliers focused on hostels or small independent hotels seeking simplicity, Counter’s reputation and recent user feedback clearly favor it. Larger properties with the need for extensive integrations and modules might lean toward Tesipro, but caution is advised given the lack of recent feedback.
Counter’s UI scores a 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface. Hoteliers emphasize how fast staff can be trained and how seamlessly the system integrates into daily operations, with support from responsive team members like Evelyn and Max.
Tesipro’s usability data is unavailable, and its lack of recent reviews leaves its ease of use uncertain. Larger, complex systems often come with steeper learning curves, and without current feedback, it’s hard to gauge whether Tesipro has addressed usability issues.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 16 shared features with Tesipro, plus three exclusive modules: guest CRM, guest profiles, and ancillary revenue tracking. Tesipro’s 28 unique features include specialized modules like Spa & Wellness, EPoS, task management, digital registration, and real-time status updates—ideal for full-service hotels.
Counter’s features are more basic, fitting small properties that need core functionalities. Tesipro’s extensive modules support larger, complex operations but may be excessive for smaller properties. Ultimately, if you need a broad feature set, Tesipro wins; if simplicity suffices, Counter is better.
Edge: Tesipro.
Counter’s support is highly rated at 4.96/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Specific mentions include quick replies from team members like Evelyn and Max, reinforcing confidence in their service.
Tesipro’s support reputation and recent reviews are absent, making it difficult to compare support quality. For hotel operators relying on reliable support, Counter’s current high ratings are a decisive advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter connects with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, and WuBook. Tesipro’s 25 verified partners include major industry players such as Cendyn, RateGain, and Nonius, offering broader connectivity.
While Tesipro’s extensive integrations may appeal to larger properties needing multiple system linkages, Counter’s strategic integrations are sufficient for small to mid-sized hostels, offering streamlined operations. For your needs, the breadth of integrations in Tesipro might be overkill unless you operate at a larger scale.
Edge: Tesipro.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 reviews, last six months) reflect an average rating of 4.73/5, with a 91% likelihood of recommendation. Hoteliers in the hostel segment highlight its ease of use, quick support, and reliability.
Tesipro has no recent reviews or ratings, so we cannot determine current user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Counter, it clearly holds the higher rating among current users.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose a pricing model, but it is known to be a free, no-implementation-fee PMS tailored for hostels. Tesipro’s base price starts at $1,300, but there’s no mention of ongoing monthly fees or customizable options.
Counter’s free model makes it accessible for small properties, whereas Tesipro’s cost may be justifiable for larger operations needing its extensive modules. However, the lack of current pricing details for Tesipro warrants caution.
Not ideal if your property requires multiple complex modules like spa management, detailed revenue analysis, or extensive integrations with large OTAs.
Not ideal if your property is small, independent, or prioritizes a simple, cost-effective management solution.
Counter’s core strength lies in its simplicity, active user base, and recent high ratings. It’s perfect for hostels and small properties that need an intuitive, reliable PMS without the complexity or cost of larger systems.
Tesipro offers a broad array of features but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, making its current performance uncertain. It’s suited for large, complex hotels and chains that can benefit from its extensive modules, assuming its platform remains as robust as advertised.
If your property’s operational focus is on ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, Counter is the clear choice. For full-scale hotel management with advanced features, Tesipro could be suitable—if it delivers on its promises today.
In conclusion, given the current data, Counter is the stronger option due to its active user reviews, higher ratings, and proven support. Consider Tesipro only if your hotel has the resources to explore its extensive capabilities and can verify ongoing platform stability.
Note: This analysis is based on available reviews, feature comparisons, and product descriptions as of October 2023. Always verify with the vendor for up-to-date details.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Tesipro share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Tesipro share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Tesipro offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Tesipro: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Tesipro has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor