The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest CRM.
Check-in shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Check-in users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and The Alpha by Check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and operational focus. Counter is primarily designed for hostels and small accommodations, emphasizing ease of use and affordability, while The Alpha caters to a broader spectrum of independent hotels, resorts, and multi-property groups with its extensive modules. Both streamline management but diverge significantly in features and market presence.
Counter offers a simple, mobile-friendly PMS tailored for hostel environments, with features like group management and guest CRM. The Alpha provides a more comprehensive, modular platform suitable for larger, multi-property operations needing detailed revenue management and analytics. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s scale and complexity?
Counter stands out as a straightforward, cost-effective PMS built for hostels and small accommodations, with a user-friendly interface and essential features like direct billing and guest profiles. Conversely, The Alpha offers an expansive suite of modules—including revenue management and business intelligence—making it more suitable for larger properties or groups managing multiple hotels.
Counter’s recent reviews highlight its simplicity, with 54 reviews averaging 4.73/5, and a 91% recommendation rate. The Alpha, lacking recent reviews and a dedicated rating, appears less proven in current hotel operations. Are you prioritizing ease of use or full-featured management?
If your hotel is a hostel or small property needing quick, easy management with minimal training, Counter is the clear choice. Its mobile app and centralized guest CRM streamline daily tasks and guest interactions, especially for hostels with high occupancy turnover.
If your hotel operates multiple properties or requires advanced revenue management, detailed analytics, and extensive customization, The Alpha’s modular approach is more appropriate. It supports complex setups and offers modules like revenue management and business intelligence that Counter does not.
For solo boutique hotels or hostels, Counter’s simplicity and recent positive reviews make it the better fit. Larger, multi-property hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich system should lean toward The Alpha.
Counter boasts an overall ease of use rating of 4.6/5, praised for its intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and quick staff onboarding, with 54 reviews emphasizing its straightforward setup. Users appreciate its simple calendar management and fast support from staff like Evelyn and Max, though some report bugs impacting bed availability.
The Alpha lacks recent reviews, but its modular design aims for flexibility and ease of customization. However, its complexity might require longer onboarding and training periods for staff unfamiliar with more comprehensive systems.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 10 shared features with The Alpha, but has 9 exclusive features such as mobile app, guest CRM, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support, tailored for hostel management. Notably, it includes group functionality and centralized user management, which are critical for hostels managing many guests simultaneously.
The Alpha provides modules like Revenue Management, Reservation Center, and Business Intelligence, which Counter does not include. Its features focus on detailed data analysis and multi-property control, making it attractive for larger hotels and chains.
Edge: Counter, for its targeted hostel features and user-friendly design.
Counter receives high praise for its support, with a 4.96/5 rating based on 54 reviews, often mentioning quick, helpful responses from staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers frequently highlight the responsiveness and professionalism of support, despite occasional slowdown during off-hours.
The Alpha does not have recent or detailed support reviews available, making it difficult to assess its support quality. Given the current data, Counter’s support team is clearly more trusted and well-rated.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder and Cloudbeds, and payment systems such as Stripe. It also supports integrations with POS systems and keyless entry providers like Goki, streamlining operations across platforms.
The Alpha offers only 1 verified integration, with eRevMax as its sole partner, limiting its connectivity options. For hotels needing extensive third-party integrations, Counter’s broader ecosystem is a significant advantage.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews reflect an average rating of 4.73/5 with 54 reviews, predominantly from hostel operators, many of whom praise its simplicity and support. Its user base in hostels rates it highly, with 52 reviews averaging 4.75/5, citing ease of use and quick onboarding.
Since The Alpha lacks recent reviews and a measurable rating, Counter is clearly favored by hoteliers in the current market context. Its high review count and recent feedback give it a tangible edge in user satisfaction.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing details, but it is known for being a free PMS tailored for hostels. Its core features are accessible without implementation fees, making it especially attractive for small or budget-conscious properties.
The Alpha’s pricing is also not publicly available, but given its modular nature and target market, it likely involves licensing fees based on modules and property count. Small hotels might find The Alpha’s costs prohibitive compared to Counter’s free model.
Counter and The Alpha are designed for different hotel segments and operational needs. Counter excels in simplicity, affordability, and hostel-specific features, making it ideal for small, high-turnover properties.
The Alpha offers an expansive, modular platform suited for larger hotels or chains that need detailed analytics and extensive customization. If your hotel is a hostel or small property, Counter is the smarter choice; larger, multi-property brands should consider The Alpha’s comprehensive modules.
If ease of use and rapid onboarding are your priorities, Counter’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the recommended option. Conversely, if your hotel’s complexity demands a highly customizable system and you have the resources to implement it, The Alpha may better serve your needs.
In conclusion, for most small to medium hostels and boutique hotels, Counter’s proven track record, customer support, and recent positive feedback make it the superior choice. Larger or multi-property hotels seeking detailed management tools and analytics should weigh The Alpha’s capabilities carefully, despite the current lack of recent reviews.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and The Alpha share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Revenue management module |
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and The Alpha share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while The Alpha offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. The Alpha: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Check-in has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor