The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
SS&C shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while SS&C users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and TimeShareWare by SS&C hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both aim to manage property functions but diverge greatly in scope, focus, and user experience. Counter is explicitly built for hostels, prioritizing simplicity and ease of use, while TimeShareWare targets timeshare and resort management with comprehensive features. Which solution aligns more closely with your property type and operational complexity?
Counter simplifies hostel operations with an intuitive interface, while TimeShareWare offers a broad suite for complex multi-site timeshare resorts. Your decision depends on whether you need a lightweight PMS for a hostel or a full-featured property management platform for larger, more intricate properties.
Counter is designed solely for hostels, boasting a straightforward, easy-to-understand interface, and is favored by hostel operators for its rapid onboarding and minimal training needs. TimeShareWare, by contrast, caters to resorts and timeshare properties, offering extensive financial management, owner services, and multi-site capabilities that are overkill for most hostels.
Counter’s strong point is its focus on hostel-specific needs like bed management, quick check-ins, and automated POS features, while TimeShareWare excels with leasing, complex accounting, and owner relations. If your property is a hostel, Counter’s streamlined approach makes it the better fit; if you manage a resort with multiple units and complex transactions, TimeShareWare could be more suitable.
Do you need a simple system that gets the job done efficiently, or a detailed platform for managing multiple property types and advanced financials?
If your hotel is a hostel, budget, or boutique property, go with Counter. Its ease of use, quick setup, and specialized features for small-scale operations make it ideal for properties with limited complexity. For boutique hotels or properties with a significant focus on guest experience over complex financial tracking, Counter’s interface and customer support are highly rated.
If your property handles multiple ownership types, complex lease agreements, or operates as a resort with numerous units, TimeShareWare is the better choice. It’s suited for large-scale, multi-site resorts needing detailed accounting, owner management, and asset insight. TimeShareWare’s extensive feature set is designed for large, multi-property operations, not small or straightforward properties.
Are you seeking rapid deployment and ease of use, or a platform capable of supporting complex, multi-faceted property management?
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its clean, intuitive interface that’s simple to learn and operate. The onboarding process is rated at 4.7/5, with most hoteliers stating staff can get up to speed quickly, and its mobile compatibility allows management on the go.
TimeShareWare does not have a publicly available ease-of-use rating or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its user-friendliness. Given its target market—large, complex resorts—it’s likely more intricate and requires dedicated training.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features unique to its platform, including channel management, online booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, a guest CRM, and multi-currency support. These features cater directly to hostel needs, making daily operations smoother and more efficient.
TimeShareWare, on the other hand, emphasizes financial management, owner services, and multi-site operations but lacks the specific features that Counter provides. Its functionalities are broad but may be less tailored to small properties.
For property-specific features like group bookings, housekeeping, or online support, Counter’s suite is more comprehensive. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support team scores a 4.96/5, with many reviews highlighting rapid, helpful responses, especially from team members like Evelyn and Max. Users appreciate their promptness and understanding, even during system bugs.
TimeShareWare’s customer support details are unavailable, and no recent reviews highlight support quality. Given the complexity of its solutions, dedicated onboarding and support are likely, but that remains unverified.
Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts 7 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, providing extensive connectivity options for channel management, payments, and access control. TimeShareWare has only 1 verified partner, Whistle, which limits its ability to connect with other platforms.
Counter’s broad integration ecosystem allows your hotel to unify systems and streamline operations, a significant advantage for busy hostels relying on multiple online channels and POS systems. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s overall score of 4.73/5, based on 54 reviews with recent data, reflects strong satisfaction among hostel and small hotel operators. The average rating from review comments highlights its ease of use and customer support.
TimeShareWare has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its target market of large resorts suggests its complexity might be appropriate, but without feedback, it’s difficult to compare.
Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing details or subscription models. Counter is free to use, making it highly attractive for small hostels and startups, while TimeShareWare typically offers tailored quotes for resorts and large properties.
Your total costs will depend on your property size, required integrations, and optional features, but Counter’s free model provides significant upfront value for small-scale operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter is a straightforward, user-friendly PMS tailored for small-scale, hostel, and boutique properties, emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and essential features. It excels in streamlining daily tasks with automation and integrations, making it the smart choice for properties with basic operational needs.
TimeShareWare offers a robust, multi-site management solution for large resorts and timeshares, providing extensive financial and owner management capabilities. Its depth makes it suitable for complex, multi-location properties but may be too intricate for smaller hotels.
Choose Counter if your property is a hostel or boutique with straightforward operations. Opt for TimeShareWare if you manage a large resort, timeshare, or multi-site operation requiring advanced financial and asset management.
If your focus is on ease of use, rapid deployment, and dedicated hostel features, Counter stands out as the clear winner. Conversely, for extensive operational complexity and multi-property oversight, TimeShareWare is the more comprehensive platform—though at the expense of simplicity.
In summary, for most small hotels and hostels, Counter’s more recent reviews, higher ratings, and feature set make it the better choice.
According to HTR's product database, Counter and TimeShareWare share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and TimeShareWare share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while TimeShareWare offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. TimeShareWare: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and SS&C has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor