The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
webhotelier | primalres group shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while webhotelier | primalres group users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | #53 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | #81 0 reviews |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | #72 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | #47 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and PMS hotelizer by Webhotelier | Primalres Group boils down to your hotel’s specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but Counter excels in serving hostels with its simplicity and robust features, whereas hotelizer caters to a broader hotel segment with extensive analytics and automation. Are you prioritizing ease of use and dedicated hostel management, or do you need a more comprehensive system for a diverse property portfolio?
Counter offers a straightforward, user-friendly interface tailored for small to mid-sized hostels, especially those with limited technical staff. Conversely, hotelizer provides a more complex set of tools suited to larger hotels with busy operations requiring detailed reporting and automation. Which system aligns best with your hotel's operational demands?
Counter has amassed a significantly larger number of recent reviews—54 in the last six months—and holds a higher overall rating of 4.73/5. Its high customer support score of 4.96/5 and ease of use rating of 4.6/5 reinforce its reputation among hostel operators. In contrast, hotelizer has no recent reviews or overall rating, making Counter the more trustworthy and tested option for your hotel.
Since recent reviews are your best indicator of a product’s current quality, Counter’s active user base and ongoing support make it the stronger choice today. Do you want your hotel management system backed by a vibrant, feedback-driven community? Then Counter is the preferred option.
Counter is designed primarily for hostels but is also suitable for boutique and small city-center hotels, especially those with a focus on simplicity and automation. Its features include channel management, booking engine, POS integration, and guest CRM, all tailored for small-scale operations.
Hotelizer, on the other hand, claims to serve a broader hotel market, with features like AI-powered reviews, detailed analytics, and extensive automation, aiming at larger properties with complex needs. However, without recent user reviews, it’s difficult to confirm its real-world effectiveness for these segments.
Counter's focus on hostels with a streamlined, mobile-friendly interface makes it ideal for small teams that value ease and speed. Hotelizer’s broad feature set might appeal to larger hotels with dedicated staff for data analysis and automation, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance.
Would your team benefit from a simple, reliable system or a more intricate one for a bigger operation? Counter’s current review activity suggests it’s better suited for the former.
Choose Counter if your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-learn system that facilitates daily operations—especially for hostels or small properties. Its features include channel management, online booking, integrated payments, and guest CRM, all with an intuitive interface rated 4.6/5 by users.
Opt for hotelizer if you operate a larger hotel that requires extensive reporting, AI-driven insights, and automation tools to manage reservations and guest services. Its broader suite of features and analytics are designed for properties with complex operational demands.
If your hotel prioritizes quick onboarding, strong support, and a simple interface, Counter is the better pick. Conversely, if your operations demand a detailed analytics dashboard and automation, hotelizer might be more suitable—though its current reviews are unavailable.
Counter’s UI is consistently praised for its simplicity, with a 4.6/5 ease of use rating. Users highlight its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile compatibility, making staff training quick and straightforward. Customers also note that the system is straightforward enough for non-technical staff to navigate confidently.
Hotelizer’s interface is described as comprehensive but potentially more complex, suitable for larger teams comfortable with data-heavy platforms. However, no current reviews make it difficult to gauge its ease of use in practice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features including channel management, online booking engine, POS system, automated night audit, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and ancillary revenue tracking. These features are tailored for small to medium-hostel operations, emphasizing automation and mobility.
Hotelizer’s unspecified features likely include AI-powered analytics and extensive automation, but the lack of detailed recent data means we can’t confirm feature parity or uniqueness. Counter clearly leads with tangible, well-reviewed features that directly impact daily operations.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support scores are outstanding at 4.96/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpful staff—particularly Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate the quick resolution of issues and the team’s receptiveness to feedback.
There are no recent reviews for hotelizer, making it impossible to evaluate its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, Counter’s proven responsiveness makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including Stripe, Cloudbeds, SiteMinder, and Goki, focusing on payment processing and channel management. Its integrations are tailored for hostel-specific needs, streamlining payments and access management.
Hotelizer boasts 15 verified integrations, including major PMS and booking platforms like Mews, Duetto, and TripAdvisor, suggesting broader connectivity. Yet, without recent user feedback, the effectiveness of these integrations remains unverified.
Edge: Hotelizer.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, and a likelihood to recommend of 91%. Hoteliers particularly praise its ease of use, support, and features tailored for hostels, with some calling it the “best option for hostels.”
Hotelizer has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to compare user satisfaction accurately. The active review activity for Counter indicates it is the more trusted and appreciated system among hoteliers today.
Edge: Counter.
Counter does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is known to operate on a subscription basis with no implementation or trial fees, suggesting a straightforward pricing model. Hotelizer similarly offers no clear pricing details, hinting at custom quotes based on property needs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best approach is to contact sales for both, but Counter’s active user base suggests it might be more accessible for small to mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive analytics, complex revenue management, or large-scale automation.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs simple management, or prefers a system with recent user reviews.
Counter is a streamlined, hostelry-focused PMS with a proven track record. Its intuitive interface, critical features, and high customer support scores make it ideal for small to medium hostels and boutique hotels.
Hotelizer offers a broader set of features geared toward larger, more complex hotels, but the absence of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain. If your hotel values active support, ease of use, and a strong user base, Counter is the clear choice.
Choose Counter if you want a dependable, easy-to-manage PMS with recent, positive reviews. Hotelizer might suit larger, data-driven properties seeking extensive automation—yet its current lack of recent feedback makes Counter the safer, more proven option today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and PMS hotelizer share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and PMS hotelizer share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while PMS hotelizer offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. PMS hotelizer: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and webhotelier | primalres group has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor