The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Winner Hotel Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 57 | 0 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Counter users most value its user interface and usability, customer support, automated features, while Winner Hotel Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #26 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #46 4 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #32 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #31 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #44 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #43 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #32 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #25 8 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #20 25 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #16 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #11 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational success. Both Counter and Winner PMS aim to streamline bookings, guest management, and daily operations, but they diverge significantly in reputation, features, and user experience. Counter, with over 54 recent reviews and a high overall rating, is clearly the more established and trusted solution. Are you prepared to prioritize recent feedback and proven performance?
Counter by Counter is the clear choice for hoteliers who value a well-rated, feature-rich PMS with extensive regional presence, especially in the hostel segment. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews), despite its strong reputation in the industry, lacks recent reviews and a broad regional footprint, making it less reliable for now. For your hotel, prioritizing current performance and user satisfaction points toward Counter.
Counter and Winner PMS serve the same core purpose—simplifying hotel operations—but their market presence and review data differ greatly. Counter, founded in 2019 and based in Germany, has accumulated 54 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Conversely, Winner PMS, with no recent reviews, has a less transparent recent performance record, and its global footprint is more limited.
Counter’s reviews highlight its ease of use, excellent support, and a broad feature set tailored for hostels and small hotels. Some users mention bugs, especially with bed availability and overbooking, but ongoing improvements and responsive support mitigate these issues. Winner PMS, on the other hand, has a strong industry reputation but lacks recent user feedback to validate current performance. Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent validation?
If your hotel operates primarily within the hostel segment or needs an intuitive, mobile-friendly PMS, Counter is the better choice. Its high user ratings, comprehensive features—including channel management, online booking, payments, and guest CRM—and active regional presence make it suitable for properties seeking simplicity and reliability.
If your hotel demands a more established system with a potentially broader integration ecosystem and you’re comfortable with less recent feedback, Winner PMS may suit you. However, given the lack of recent reviews and limited regional reach, Counter’s proven track record offers more certainty for your operational needs today.
Counter boasts a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, with users praising its intuitive, clean interface and quick onboarding process. Its mobile-friendly design allows staff to manage reservations on the go, and support from Evelyn and Max is frequently highlighted as prompt and helpful.
Winner PMS’s usability is not clearly reflected in recent reviews, but industry reputation suggests an emphasis on user-centered design. However, the absence of recent user feedback makes it difficult to assess current ease of use. Based on available data, Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, housekeeping module, automated night audit, and guest CRM—all tailored for hostel and small hotel needs. It also supports multi-currency, multi-lingual interfaces, and ancillary revenue tracking, providing a holistic operational toolkit.
Winner PMS’s feature set is not detailed in recent reviews, but industry standing indicates it offers reservation, billing, housekeeping, and other essential functions. Without specific feature comparisons, Counter’s broader, more detailed feature list gives it the edge in versatility and specialization, especially for smaller properties.
Counter’s support team scores a 4.96/5, with reviews highlighting rapid, helpful responses from team members like Evelyn and Max. Many hoteliers appreciate their professionalism, though some note support may be slower during off-hours.
Winner PMS’s customer support reputation is solid but not recent enough to compare directly. Its industry reputation suggests reliability, but the lack of current reviews limits confidence. Based on recent feedback, Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with seven verified partners, including prominent platforms like Cloudbeds, Stripe, and SiteMinder. Its extensive partner network supports multiple channels and payment options, allowing for more flexible integrations.
Winner PMS has only one verified integration—Mews—limiting its connectivity options. For properties seeking a versatile, multi-channel operation environment, Counter’s broader integration landscape gives it a clear advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews (54 in the last six months) are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.73/5 overall rating and 91% likelihood to recommend. Its primary users—hostels—rate it particularly highly (average 4.75/5), citing ease of use and support.
Winner PMS lacks recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge current hoteliers’ satisfaction. Historically, it has been well-regarded in the industry, but without fresh data, Counter’s recent high ratings and volume of feedback make it the more reliable choice today. Edge: Counter.
Both products do not publicly list detailed pricing structures, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Counter’s model is not freemium or flat-rate; similarly, Winner PMS offers no transparent pricing.
Budget considerations should involve direct vendor contact for quotes. However, Counter’s active feature set and recent reviews point to a solution that offers good value, especially for small to mid-sized properties.
Counter offers a feature-rich, user-friendly PMS with high recent satisfaction and extensive integrations, making it ideal for smaller hotels and hostels. Its recent review volume and high ratings provide confidence in its current capabilities.
Winner PMS, despite its industry reputation, suffers from a lack of recent reviews and limited regional coverage. Its focus on larger-scale hotel operations may appeal to properties with complex needs, but the absence of current feedback diminishes its reliability for now.
For your hotel, especially if you prioritize recent user experiences and active regional presence, Counter is the safer, more proven option. It combines a broad feature set with excellent support, making it the recommended choice today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Counter and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Counter and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Counter offers 7 verified integration partners, while Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Counter: No. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Counter has an HT Score of 17 and Winner Hotel Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor