The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 137 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CQR shines .
freetobook shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Payment Requests.
Side-by-side ratings based on 137 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 137 |
After analyzing 137 verified reviews, CQR users most value its , while freetobook users highlight ease of use, pricing/value for money, guest experience enhancements. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CQR |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Pricing/Value for Money
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Self-Catering Focus
▾
|
|
|
−
Handling of Single vs. Double Occupancy Rates
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #28 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #25 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #23 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #26 20 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #26 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #28 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #8 94 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #22 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #14 2 reviews |
Choosing between CQR PMS by CQR and freetobook hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Both aim to manage reservations and streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in usability, features, and market presence. CQR’s lack of recent reviews and limited functionality contrast sharply with freetobook’s strong, recent user feedback and extensive feature set. Which product truly fits your hotel’s growth trajectory?
CQR PMS offers a traditional property management approach, but with no recent reviews or demonstrated functionality, it’s hard to gauge its current suitability. Freetobook, on the other hand, boasts 129 recent reviews in the last six months, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, making it the more reliable choice based on recent user experiences.
Both products aim to simplify reservation management, but freetobook provides a comprehensive suite of tools, including channel management, booking engine, and guest communication features. CQR’s limited online presence makes it difficult to assess its capabilities, leaving freetobook as the clear leader for most hoteliers.
Are you ready to rely on a system with proven, recent support and positive feedback?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich platform with proven customer satisfaction and active support, go with freetobook. It suits small to medium properties wanting seamless OTA integration, guest messaging, and revenue tools.
If your hotel is seeking a basic, less proven solution with no recent reviews or detailed feature list, consider CQR. However, be aware that its current capabilities and support reputation are unclear, making freetobook the safer choice for most hoteliers.
Ultimately, if your priority is operational efficiency and guest experience, freetobook is the clear winner. For a more experimental or legacy setup, CQR might suffice—but caution is advised.
Freetobook’s user rating of 4.91 out of 5 and the consistent praise for its intuitive, simple interface make it one of the easiest PMS options for hoteliers. Its onboarding process is rated nearly 5 stars, with reviewers highlighting how quickly new staff pick up its functions.
CQR, with a 0/5 overall rating and no recent reviews, provides no concrete data on usability. This absence suggests it may lack the ease and clarity freetobook offers.
Edge: freetobook.
Freetobook boasts 38 unique features, including channel management, booking engine, online check-in, guest messaging, integrated payment processing, and revenue management tools. Its ability to automate tasks and improve operational workflows is well-documented in recent reviews.
CQR, with no verified features listed and no demonstrated functionality, cannot match the breadth or depth of freetobook’s offerings. Its lack of recent activity leaves its feature set unverified.
Edge: freetobook.
Freetobook’s customer support scores a nearly perfect 4.91 out of 5, with reviewers praising its quick, knowledgeable assistance, often describing it as “second to none.” The recent reviews confirm consistent, responsive support, critical for hoteliers needing reliable help.
CQR offers no recent reviews or support ratings, indicating a lack of recent customer feedback or support insights. This lack of data suggests freetobook’s support is more dependable.
Edge: freetobook.
Freetobook integrates with four verified partners, including Stripe, RoomPriceGenie, Pitchup.com, and Sweeply, providing options for payments, channel management, and marketing.
CQR, with no verified partners or integrations, falls short in this area. The ability to connect with third-party tools is essential for modern hotel operations, favoring freetobook.
Edge: freetobook.
Freetobook’s recent reviews consistently rate it above 4.9/5, with nearly 99% of users willing to recommend it. Its core user base mainly consists of Bed & Breakfasts (38%) and small hotels, which appreciate its simplicity and support.
CQR, with zero reviews and ratings, offers no current user feedback to compare. Based on recent data, freetobook is the clear favorite among hoteliers.
Edge: freetobook.
CQR does not publicly list pricing, leaving its costs uncertain. Freetobook charges a flat $200 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, offering transparent, predictable costs.
For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking a clear pricing structure, freetobook’s straightforward fee model is advantageous.
Not ideal if your hotel needs active support, recent updates, or a broad feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced self-catering features or complex, large-scale operations that might need custom solutions.
Freetobook’s recent reviews and high user satisfaction make it the superior choice for most hoteliers today. Its extensive feature set and active support support a hotel’s growth and operational efficiency.
CQR, lacking recent reviews and demonstrable functionality, is less reliable. If you want a proven, modern property management platform, freetobook is the clear pick.
For small to medium properties seeking simplicity, revenue tools, and dependable support, go with freetobook. If your hotel is experimenting with older or less supported systems, CQR may suffice—but proceed with caution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| CQR |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CQR PMS and freetobook share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The software’s user-friendly nature is a major highlight, enabling even less tech-savvy users to manage their properties efficiently. This simplicity... The software’s user-friendly nature is a major highlight, enabling even less tech-savvy users to manage their properties efficiently. This simplicity allows property owners and managers to easily navigate the system, reducing the time required for administrative tasks and thereby increasing focus on improving guest services.
Freetobook is perceived as excellent value for money, offering advanced features at competitive pricing. Users recognize its affordability in comparis... Freetobook is perceived as excellent value for money, offering advanced features at competitive pricing. Users recognize its affordability in comparison to other systems, which is particularly attractive to small accommodation businesses looking to maintain professional operations without significant outlays.
Freetobook enables hotels to enhance the guest experience through features like the GuestAppy system, which provides personalized booking confirmation... Freetobook enables hotels to enhance the guest experience through features like the GuestAppy system, which provides personalized booking confirmations and tailored options. Users note these additions positively impact guest satisfaction and help in delivering a more professional service.
Where hoteliers push back
Although generally praised for its flexibility, some users feel there's room for improvement regarding customization options, particularly for invoice... Although generally praised for its flexibility, some users feel there's room for improvement regarding customization options, particularly for invoices and booking summaries. Enhanced options would allow users to better tailor the system to specific operational needs, improving overall satisfaction.
The system is primarily designed for hotels, and some reviewers have indicated a need for more self-catering features, suggesting potential for expans... The system is primarily designed for hotels, and some reviewers have indicated a need for more self-catering features, suggesting potential for expansion in this area. Addressing this could make Freetobook more attractive to a wider variety of accommodation providers.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CQR PMS and freetobook share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CQR PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while freetobook offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. freetobook leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CQR PMS: No. freetobook: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CQR has an HT Score of 0 and freetobook has 87. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor