The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CQR shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, CQR users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CQR |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. You’re evaluating CQR PMS by CQR and Infor HMS by Infor, both designed to streamline your hotel management tasks. While they serve similar purposes, their features, support, and market presence differ significantly, influencing which suits your hotel best.
CQR PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its current performance. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts over 46 recent reviews and a solid overall rating of 4.04 out of 5, with a high likelihood to recommend. This difference in review activity and recency makes Infor the more credible choice today. Are you ready to make a decision based on current hotelier feedback?
Both CQR PMS and Infor HMS aim to simplify hotel operations, but their maturity levels and feature sets diverge. CQR, with no reviews or recent user feedback, appears to be an under-the-radar or less-established solution. Meanwhile, Infor has extensive reviews—46 in the last six months—indicating active adoption and ongoing development.
User feedback suggests Infor is appreciated for its comprehensive features, including automation and integration, but also reports issues like bugs during updates. CQR’s lack of recent reviews makes it hard to judge whether it addresses modern hotel needs or keeps pace with industry standards. Would you prefer a system with proven, recent hotelier backing or an untested option?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, scalable PMS capable of handling complex operations, Infor is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support—caters well to mid-sized and large properties seeking robust automation.
However, if your hotel is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a simpler approach without many integrations, CQR might seem appealing—though its lack of recent feedback makes this uncertain. Typically, hotels requiring a proven, well-supported solution should opt for Infor, especially given its reputation and active user base.
Infor HMS scores 3.88 out of 5 in ease of use, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation and short onboarding times. Support responsiveness and staff friendliness are also praised, with many users describing the system as "easy to understand and operate" after initial setup.
CQR’s usability cannot be assessed due to a lack of reviews, but the absence of recent user feedback suggests caution. Based on the available data, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, multi-currency support, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features are designed for comprehensive operational control and automation.
CQR has zero reported features or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature depth. Given Infor’s extensive feature list, it’s clearly the more capable system for hotels seeking advanced functionalities. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor’s support scores 4.04 out of 5, with multiple reviews emphasizing quick, professional, and helpful responses. Hoteliers appreciate the responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is vital for daily hotel operations.
CQR has no recent reviews or ratings, so support quality remains unknown. The lack of feedback makes Infor’s support reputation the safer choice. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor boasts 113 verified integrations, including booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, alongside payment processors and revenue tools. These integrations reduce manual work and improve data consistency across operational systems.
CQR reports no verified integrations, limiting its functionality and flexibility. If your hotel relies on seamless third-party system integrations, Infor’s extensive partner network strongly favors it. Edge: Infor HMS.
Given CQR’s absence of recent reviews, it cannot be rated. Infor, with 46 reviews, holds an overall rating of 4.04/5, with many users praising its scalability and operational improvements.
Property types like boutique and independent hotels rate Infor higher, often citing its customization and automation capabilities. Larger properties and chains find its features indispensable. Since CQR lacks recent user feedback, Infor stands as the more endorsed choice today. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both are unavailable, indicating they may be customized or not openly listed. However, the absence of clear pricing information suggests you should contact vendors directly for quotes tailored to your hotel size and needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS emerges as the more mature, feature-rich, and actively supported system, backed by over 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating. Its broad integration options, strong customer support, and positive hotelier feedback make it a reliable choice for hotels of all sizes.
CQR PMS, lacking recent reviews and a feature set, appears less suited for hotels seeking proven technology and ongoing support. Unless your hotel has very limited needs and prefers a non-cloud or custom solution, Infor is the clear recommendation.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive integrations, and comprehensive features, go with Infor HMS. For small, budget-conscious hotels or those who prefer minimal complexity, CQR might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution due to the limited recent data.
According to HTR's product database, CQR PMS and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CQR PMS and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CQR PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CQR PMS: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CQR has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor