The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CQR shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, CQR users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CQR |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #49 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing between CQR PMS by CQR and Redforts can significantly impact your hotel’s daily operations, guest experience, and revenue management. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and maturity differ sharply. CQR appears to be a placeholder with no reviews or features, while Redforts is a well-established, feature-rich platform with recent positive feedback. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
CQR offers no reviews, features, or user data, making it impossible to assess its suitability or functionality. Conversely, Redforts is backed by 40 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.5/10, and a 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating a strong market presence and user satisfaction. The stark contrast in review volume and recency favors Redforts as the more reliable choice for hotel management software.
Both products aim to simplify hotel operations, but CQR’s lack of data raises questions about its viability. Redforts, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive suite of features, positive customer feedback, and consistent improvements, making it the safer and more proven option. Are you comfortable investing in a system with no current user validation, or is stability and proven performance more important?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated, easy-to-use hotel management solution with extensive features, go with Redforts. Its suite includes a booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and more, all highly rated for ease and efficiency. CQR, with zero reviews or features, offers no concrete evidence of functionality or support, making it an unsuitable choice for hotels seeking reliable technology.
If you prioritize a platform with proven capabilities, ongoing support, and a broad feature set, Redforts is the clear winner. For small to mid-sized hotels, hostels, or properties seeking automation and integration, Redforts addresses core operational needs effectively. If, however, you are contemplating a system that’s untested or lacks demonstrated value, CQR offers no assurance.
Redforts boasts a user rating of 4.68/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal staff training. Users highlight how quickly their teams adapt and how the platform reduces human errors, streamlining daily operations.
CQR’s ease of use is unknown, as no reviews or user feedback are available. Without data, it’s impossible to gauge how quickly your team could adopt CQR or whether it would integrate into your operations smoothly. Given the importance of ease of adoption, Redforts clearly has the upper hand here.
Edge: Redforts
Redforts offers 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, guest messaging, online check-in, integrated ID scanners, and a mobile app, making it a comprehensive management platform. Its features support automation, multi-channel distribution, and detailed reporting, providing a broad operational toolkit.
CQR provides no features or functionalities, rendering it unusable in comparison. Without any features or evidence of capability, CQR cannot meet modern hotel operational demands. Therefore, Redforts’s extensive feature set clearly outperforms any nonexistent offering from CQR.
Edge: Redforts
Redforts receives a customer support rating of 4.53/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, availability, and friendly service. Recent comments emphasize quick issue resolution and effective onboarding, contributing to higher satisfaction levels.
CQR’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to evaluate the quality or responsiveness of their support team. In hospitality technology, dependable support is critical—Redforts’s high scores and recent reviews suggest it’s the safer choice.
Edge: Redforts
Redforts integrates with two verified partners: Mr. Winston and WuBook, facilitating channel management and booking engine connectivity. Though the total number of integrations is limited, the existing integrations cover essential hotel management functions.
CQR has no verified integrations or partner data, indicating its system may lack connectivity with key platforms. For hotels relying on multi-platform coordination, Redforts’s existing integrations provide a significant advantage, ensuring smoother operations.
Edge: Redforts
With 40 recent reviews, Redforts enjoys a high NPS of 9.5/10 and a recommendation likelihood of 95%. Hotel segments including hostels, boutique hotels, and residences rate the platform highly for ease of use and management efficiency.
CQR has no reviews, ratings, or segment-specific feedback available. This absence makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction reliably. The consistent positive feedback for Redforts makes it the superior-rated choice among hotelier users.
Edge: Redforts
CQR’s pricing is not disclosed; it appears to be a custom or undeclared solution with no trial or fee structure provided. Redforts charges a base price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial offered, but its comprehensive features justify this cost for many users.
The lack of transparent pricing for CQR complicates cost comparisons. Redforts’s clear pricing model and feature-rich platform make it easier for your team to evaluate value and budget accordingly.
Given the absence of features, reviews, or support data, CQR is not recommended for any hotel type. If a hotel considers untested or unsupported systems, it might be tempted, but the risks far outweigh the potential benefits.
Redforts suits a range of properties, especially those seeking automation and integration:
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly customizable or specialized features that Redforts does not offer, or if your property is very small and needs only minimal management.
Redforts is a mature, feature-packed PMS and management platform with proven positive reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and recent updates. Its extensive functionalities cover most operational needs, offering automation, integration, and support for a variety of property types.
CQR, with no reviews, features, or demonstrated support, doesn’t provide the reliability or capabilities your hotel needs today. If you want a solution that’s trusted by users and continuously improved, Redforts is the clear choice.
Choose Redforts if you prioritize proven support, extensive features, and recent positive reviews. Avoid CQR unless your hotel is willing to risk an untested, unsupported system with no available user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, CQR PMS and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CQR |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CQR PMS and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. CQR PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CQR PMS: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CQR has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor