The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 67 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Enola Labs shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 67 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 67 | 0 |
After analyzing 67 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its customer service, user interface, customization, while Enola Labs users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
User interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 31 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 27 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #10 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 26 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #8 31 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #8 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform and Enola Labs comes down to understanding what each product is designed for and how they align with your hotel’s needs. Crave offers a ready-to-use, comprehensive guest app focused on service automation and engagement, while Enola Labs functions as a custom software developer creating tailored digital solutions. Do you want an established platform with proven hospitality integrations, or a bespoke app built specifically for your hotel?
Crave’s extensive feature set, proven track record, and high review count make it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking a ready-made guest app. Enola Labs, however, may be suitable if your hotel requires a highly customized digital solution integrated into broader business systems. Which approach best suits your hotel’s goals?
Crave Mobile Platform has a significant advantage with its 48 reviews, a 4.75/5 overall rating, and recent positive feedback, making it the more dependable choice. Enola Labs, with no reviews and no established hospitality features, is less proven in this space. For most hotels, Crave’s proven performance and extensive integrations make it the clear leader.
If your hotel needs an out-of-the-box, easy-to-implement guest app with high user satisfaction, go with Crave. If you require a completely bespoke digital solution designed from scratch, Enola Labs may be worth exploring, but be prepared for longer development timelines and less immediate proven results.
Crave excels with a 4.61/5 ease of use rating, backed by positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick deployment. Hoteliers highlight its user-friendly guest interface, straightforward setup, and smooth staff onboarding, with many mentioning their teams adopted it rapidly.
Enola Labs, in contrast, has no publicly available reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. The absence of customer feedback indicates it may not yet have a proven track record in hospitality environments.
Edge: Crave.
Crave offers 25 distinct features tailored specifically for hotel guest engagement, including web-based access, multi-lingual support, room service ordering, payments, QR codes, contactless options, local recommendations, in-venue ordering, and POS integrations. These features are designed to streamline guest interactions and operational workflows directly within the hospitality context.
Enola Labs, by comparison, provides no pre-built features or hospitality-specific functionalities, as its core focus is custom software development across industries. While adaptable, it requires development from scratch, which can be time-consuming and costly.
Edge: Crave.
Crave scores a 4.79/5 rating for customer support, with reviewers praising its quick response times and proactive service. Hoteliers often describe Crave’s customer service as exceptional, citing 24/7 support and effective resolution of issues, which significantly reduces operational disruptions.
Enola Labs has no publicly available support ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Since the company primarily serves clients through custom development, support depends heavily on individual project terms rather than ongoing hospitality-specific service.
Edge: Crave.
Crave is verified to have 17 integration partners, including notable names like Interel, Book4Time, Quore, Oracle Hospitality, and InfoGenesis. Its integration capabilities enable it to connect seamlessly with various PMS, POS, and management systems, facilitating smooth hotel operations.
Enola Labs has zero verified integrations in the hospitality sector, as it is a custom development firm. Its solutions require bespoke integration work, which may extend timelines and increase costs.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s reviews, totaling 48 in the last six months, give it an average rating of 4.75/5 and a NPS score of 9.15/10, indicating high satisfaction. Hoteliers in diverse segments, especially luxury and branded hotels, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Enola Labs has no reviews or ratings available, preventing any assessment of user satisfaction. Without proven hotel industry feedback, its reliability remains unverified.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no mention of monthly fees, implementation charges, or freemium options. Its transparent pricing reflects its status as a ready-to-deploy platform with ongoing support.
Enola Labs does not publish pricing details, as it primarily offers custom development services. Costs vary depending on project scope, complexity, and client requirements, making it less predictable for hotel managers seeking straightforward pricing.
Edge: Crave.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave Mobile Platform is a mature, feature-rich guest app solution with an established reputation, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. For hotels seeking a reliable, high-performing guest engagement platform, it offers proven results and strong support, making it the better choice for most properties.
Enola Labs, on the other hand, provides custom development services suited for hotels with highly specific needs that off-the-shelf solutions cannot address. While it offers flexibility and tailored solutions, it lacks the validation, ease of use, and proven track record necessary for most hotels looking for immediate, reliable guest app deployment.
If your hotel prioritizes proven performance, a broad feature set, and quick implementation, Crave is the clear winner. If your property demands a bespoke digital experience and you’re prepared for a longer, more involved development process, Enola Labs could be appropriate—but with less certainty about results.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Mobile Platform and Enola Labs share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Web Based (Appless) |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Mobile Platform and Enola Labs share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Mobile Platform offers 17 verified integration partners, while Enola Labs offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Mobile Platform leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Mobile Platform: No. Enola Labs: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 75 and Enola Labs has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor