The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 282 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to customer service — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Credit Card Payments.
STAY shines when it comes to guest experience optimization — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest Profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 282 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 67 | 215 |
After analyzing 282 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its customer service, user interface, customization, while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
+
User interface
▾
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 14 reviews | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 7 reviews | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 26 reviews | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 31 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 27 reviews | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 2 reviews | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 26 reviews | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #8 31 reviews | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #8 2 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly impact your guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both Crave Mobile Platform and STAY Guest App aim to improve how your guests access services, but they serve slightly different needs. Crave focuses heavily on guest engagement and service automation, while STAY emphasizes operational streamlining and real-time updates. Knowing their strengths and limitations will help you decide which aligns better with your hotel's goals.
Are you prioritizing a more established platform with extensive features and a larger global presence, or do you want a solution that simplifies operations and reduces wait times? Let's compare both in detail.
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile platform designed to elevate guest engagement through digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and extensive integrations. It has a significant review count—48 reviews—and recent feedback remains absent, making its data slightly outdated but still valuable. STAY, on the other hand, boasts over 200 reviews with recent feedback, indicating stronger current user satisfaction.
Crave’s strength lies in its extensive feature set, including QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and POS integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking a robust, customizable digital guest solution. STAY excels in operational efficiency, providing real-time updates, appointment bookings, and a straightforward CMS, making it ideal for hotels focused on reducing queues and streamlining staff workflows. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s immediate needs?
If your hotel needs a guest app that offers in-depth engagement tools and diverse features—like multi-menu ordering, contactless payments, and integrations with POS or NFC—Crave is your best option. Its high rating of 4.75/5 from 48 reviews underscores its reliability and breadth of capabilities.
However, if your primary goal is operational efficiency—reducing front desk queues, improving internal communication, and providing real-time service updates—STAY’s simpler, more streamlined platform is preferable. It’s trusted by over 1,000 hotels in 67 countries, indicating a proven track record in delivering efficiency improvements and guest satisfaction. For hotels aiming to digitize operational workflows over guest engagement, STAY is the clear choice.
Crave's user interface receives a 4.61/5 rating, praised for its customizability and ease of use for staff and guests. However, some users note that menu creation could be simpler, and the back-end system might benefit from modernization. Customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews highlighting quick and helpful responses.
STAY scores slightly higher in ease of use, with a 4.78/5 rating and reviews emphasizing its straightforward CMS and intuitive mobile experience. Its simplified design minimizes staff training time, and its user interface is praised for clarity. Edge: STAY.
Crave offers 17 unique features, including web-based (appless) operation, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and NFC. These features support a highly customizable and versatile guest experience, especially suited for hotels with varied service needs.
STAY provides 6 exclusive features, such as a dedicated mobile app, chatbot functionality, automated replies, message routing, and guest profiles. While less feature-dense, these tools excel at streamlining operations and delivering quick, automated communication.
Crave’s extensive feature set makes it the more comprehensive platform, but STAY’s targeted features focus on simplifying staff workflows. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews praising its quick, polite, and effective responses. Hoteliers appreciate its proactive support, especially during menu updates and technical issues, although some mention that hardware durability could improve.
STAY’s support is similarly rated at 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing helpful, prompt assistance. Some users note that STAY’s support lacks phone options, which can slow issue resolution for certain regions.
While both are excellent, Crave’s support has a slight edge due to more positive recent reviews. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including systems like Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, Infor, and Kipsu, providing extensive compatibility with hotel management systems. STAY, with 20 verified partners, also supports seamless integrations with PMS, CRM, and other internal applications, including Hotelkit, Mews, and SiteMinder.
Both platforms boast strong integration portfolios, but STAY’s broader partner list and widespread adoption in large chains like NH Hotels and Riu suggest a slight advantage for hotels seeking extensive system connectivity. Edge: STAY.
Crave’s overall rating is 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback indicating high satisfaction. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, integration, and customer service, especially in large or luxury hotels.
STAY’s rating is 3/5 across 200 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting operational benefits but also noting issues like slow reporting and limited language options. Given the larger review base and recent positive comments, Crave’s rating is more indicative of current hotelier satisfaction. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing begins at a base of $400, with no mention of a trial or freemium model. STAY’s base price is $300, also without a trial or free tier, making them comparable in upfront costs.
Cost considerations should include features and support: Crave’s higher price may reflect its extensive features, while STAY’s lower entry point suits hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, operational tool without many extra features or if your hotel has limited technical support.
Not ideal if you need extensive guest engagement features like digital menus or complex payment integrations.
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich guest app with high satisfaction ratings and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking engagement and marketing tools. Its strong support network and user-friendly interface make it a reliable choice, especially for larger or luxury properties.
STAY focuses on operational efficiency, with a simple, intuitive platform that reduces queues and enhances internal workflows. Its integration capabilities and real-time updates make it ideal for hotels looking to streamline staff operations and improve guest satisfaction through digital service delivery.
If your hotel values rich guest engagement and marketing, Crave is the stronger candidate. For a focus on efficiency and internal communication, STAY provides a more targeted, easy-to-implement solution.
In conclusion, choose Crave if you want a broad, feature-rich platform with high engagement capabilities. Opt for STAY if your primary goal is to improve operational flow, reduce wait times, and simplify management—especially if you prefer a straightforward, easy-to-use system with proven success in large chains.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Mobile Platform and STAY Guest App share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App download | ||
| Apple Pay | ||
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Digital Menu | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| In-Venue Ordering | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Payments | ||
| QR Codes | ||
| Web Based (Appless) |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Mobile Platform and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Mobile Platform offers 17 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Mobile Platform: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 75 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor