The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 94 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
GuestSpace shines when it comes to user experience , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Guest Profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 94 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 67 | 27 |
After analyzing 94 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its customer service, user interface, customization, while GuestSpace users highlight user experience, communication features, guest self-service features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
+
User interface
▾
|
+
Communication Features
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Guest Self-Service Features
▾
|
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
−
Integration with Lock and Reservation Systems
▾
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 31 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 27 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #10 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 26 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #8 31 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #8 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Drop.in Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest engagement and operational automation. Both solutions aim to enhance guest experiences through mobile and digital tools, but they approach this goal differently.
Crave’s platform centers on mobile access and service automation within your property, offering a wide array of features for food, beverage, and service ordering. Drop.in emphasizes streamline check-in, digital keys, and self-service functionalities that reduce staff workload and speed up guest arrivals.
Are you prioritizing extensive service features or a straightforward, self-service guest journey? Your decision should align with your hotel’s operational focus and guest expectations.
Crave offers a comprehensive mobile platform with 25+ features, including contactless ordering, multi-menu options, POS integrations, and NFC payments, tailored for hotels seeking to maximize guest engagement across various touchpoints. Its reviews highlight a high overall rating (4.75/5) and strong support, with a focus on food and service automation.
Drop.in, with fewer features (3 exclusive, totaling 12 with shared ones), concentrates on automating the check-in process, digital keys, and guest self-service, primarily reducing front desk workloads. It boasts a recent review count (26 in last 6 months) and a higher HT score (78.2 vs. 75.1), indicating more current user feedback.
While Crave is suited to hotels wanting extensive service options, Drop.in is optimized for properties seeking to streamline arrivals and reduce operational costs. Do your guests value a full-service mobile experience or quick, contactless check-in?
If your hotel needs a broad guest engagement platform with in-app ordering, integrated payment options, and multiple menu choices, Crave is the better fit. Its features support revenue growth through upselling, while its user-friendly interface scores highly among users.
If your focus is on simplifying arrival procedures, reducing front desk staff, and enabling self-check-in with digital keys, Drop.in is the right choice. Its seamless check-in flow and digital access are praised for cutting queue times and increasing efficiency.
For luxury or full-service hotels aiming to upsell dining and amenities, Crave’s feature set justifies its higher complexity. Conversely, for budget hotels, hostels, or properties emphasizing operational automation, Drop.in’s straightforward approach delivers immediate value.
Crave’s interface has a 4.61/5 rating, praised for its intuitive design and helpful onboarding, but some users mention menu customization can be complex. Customer support is rated very highly at 4.79/5, with reviews highlighting rapid and helpful responses.
Drop.in’s simplicity earns a similar 4.58/5 usability score, with many reviewers emphasizing how quickly staff and guests adapt to its self-service features. Its ease of integration with reservation systems further simplifies operations.
Edge: Crave.
Crave boasts 25 unique features, including web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and POS integrations—covering a broader set of service automation tools. Drop.in offers 3 exclusive features—mobile check-in, guest profiles, and app download—focused on streamlining arrivals and self-service.
Crave’s extensive feature set supports a wide range of guest services, while Drop.in’s core strengths lie in automating check-in and enabling digital keys. If you need extensive in-hotel service features, Crave is the clear winner.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s customer support ratings are exceptional at 4.79/5, with reviews praising their quick, proactive assistance and effective problem-solving. Users report that Crave’s support team is responsive and knowledgeable, often resolving issues within hours.
Drop.in’s support scores 4.46/5, with positive comments on collaboration but some desire for faster response times. Its support is still strong but not as highly rated as Crave’s.
Edge: Crave.
Crave offers 17 verified integration partners, including major property management and POS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Kipsu, and Amadeus. Drop.in has only 4 verified partners, including Mews, Goki, Stayntouch, and FLEXIPASS, with fewer options for external system integration.
If your hotel relies on diverse back-end systems, Crave’s broader integration ecosystem provides more flexibility and operational cohesion. Drop.in’s limited integrations might restrict customization for larger or more complex properties.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s overall rating of 4.75/5 and recent review activity (48 reviews, all recent) reflect strong, current satisfaction across segments, especially luxury and branded hotels. Its reviews mention excellent support, usability, and system reliability.
Drop.in, with fewer reviews (26, all in last 6 months), has a slightly higher HT score (78.2 vs. 75.1), but less review volume makes its reputation less established. Hoteliers in the recent review cycle seem satisfied but with less detailed feedback.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing model is a flat $400 setup fee, with no mention of monthly fees or trial options. Drop.in charges $600 upfront with no ongoing fees or free trial.
Crave’s lower initial cost and straightforward pricing make it attractive for hotels seeking value, though its extensive feature set may come with additional costs for customization. Drop.in’s slightly higher price reflects its focus on core automation features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave’s platform excels in delivering a broad array of guest services through mobile, with a focus on food and beverage, guest engagement, and system integrations. Its high user ratings, support quality, and feature depth make it suitable for hotels seeking a full-service mobile engagement solution.
Drop.in provides a streamlined, self-service experience tailored to automating arrivals and reducing operational costs. Its core strengths are digital check-in, keys, and guest self-management, making it ideal for properties focused on efficiency and minimal staff intervention.
Choose Crave if your hotel needs extensive guest engagement tools, seamless integrations, and a proven support team. Opt for Drop.in if your priority is fast, automated guest arrivals with less emphasis on in-hotel service features.
In summary, Crave is better suited for hotels that want a robust, feature-rich platform to boost revenue and guest experience. Drop.in is the better choice for hotels focused on operational automation and reducing front desk workload.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Mobile Platform and GuestSpace share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App download | ||
| Apple Pay | ||
| Credit Card Payments | ||
| Digital Menu | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| In-Venue Ordering | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| QR Codes | ||
| Web Based (Appless) |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication... The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication capabilities to enhance guest interaction further.
Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experie... Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experience. Users align this with increased operational efficiencies as well.
Where hoteliers push back
The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature red... The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature reduces the need for manual check-ins and enhances the simplicity and security of guest room access.
While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest... While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest communications and menu settings. Improvements in this area could further optimize its utility.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Mobile Platform and GuestSpace share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Mobile Platform offers 17 verified integration partners, while GuestSpace offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Mobile Platform leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Mobile Platform: No. GuestSpace: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 75 and GuestSpace has 78. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor