The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 67 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Credit Card Payments.
LasoExperience shines , with exclusive features like Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Side-by-side ratings based on 67 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 67 | 0 |
After analyzing 67 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its customer service, user interface, customization, while LasoExperience users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
User interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 26 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 31 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 27 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #10 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 26 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #8 31 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #8 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Laso Experience depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Crave is a well-established guest app that excels in service automation and operational integration, while Laso emphasizes personalized guest engagement and revenue generation through AI-driven tools. Both aim to improve guest satisfaction, but their core functions diverge significantly. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s strategy and guest expectations?
Crave’s platform is best suited for hotels that want a robust, feature-rich, and widely integrated mobile service system. Laso, on the other hand, is geared toward properties prioritizing data-driven guest relationships and upselling opportunities. Are you more focused on operational efficiency or guest personalization?
Crave Mobile Platform and Laso Experience serve different hotel priorities. Crave offers a comprehensive, app-less solution with features like in-venue ordering, contactless payments, QR codes, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational automation. Laso provides a unified CRM and marketing automation platform that excels in personalized communication and revenue optimization, suitable for hotels emphasizing guest relationships.
Crave scores higher on recent reviews and total review count (48 reviews, zero in the last six months), reflecting stronger current user feedback. Laso, with no recent reviews and no review count, has less proven recent performance data. Would you prefer a proven, feature-rich platform or a newer, AI-driven guest engagement tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive mobile app experience with in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and multi-platform integrations, Crave is the clear pick. It’s designed for hotels aiming to streamline operations, reduce manual effort, and offer a modern guest interface, particularly in luxury and branded hotel segments.
If your focus is on personalized guest communication, targeted marketing, and increasing ancillary revenue through detailed guest profiles and automation, Laso is more suitable. It’s ideal for properties wanting to build long-term guest relationships and optimize revenue streams via AI-driven insights.
For hotels seeking operational efficiency, go with Crave. For those prioritizing guest intimacy and revenue growth, choose Laso.
Crave scores a 4.61/5 in ease of use, based on extensive reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support teams. Customers highlight the platform’s user-friendly design for both staff and guests, making implementation smoother and adoption faster.
Laso Experience has no available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given Crave’s high user satisfaction ratings and recent review activity, it clearly demonstrates a more reliable and straightforward user experience.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave offers 17 unique features, including web-based access, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, tipping, upselling, and NFC. These tools support a wide range of operational needs and enhance guest convenience.
Laso provides only 3 exclusive features: guest profiles, mobile check-in, and app download capability, focusing more on guest relationship management rather than operational automation.
Crave’s extensive feature set makes it the more versatile and capable platform for full-service hotel operations.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave scores a 4.79/5 in customer support, with reviews praising its quick response times, proactive service, and knowledgeable staff. Hoteliers note that Crave’s support staff resolve issues efficiently, significantly aiding in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Laso Experience has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to evaluate its customer service quality. Given Crave’s strong recent support ratings and positive feedback, it remains the more reliable choice here.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave has 17 verified integrations, including major partners like Book4Time, Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Amadeus, and POS systems, making it highly adaptable to existing hotel systems. Laso, with only 3 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, including common platforms like Book4Time and Oracle but fewer options overall.
If your hotel relies on complex or multiple integrations, Crave’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s overall rating is 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, customer support, and feature set. Hotel segments like luxury and branded hotels particularly rate Crave highly, with some reviews mentioning how the platform has increased guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Laso Experience has no reviews, ratings, or recent feedback, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the clear, positive reviews for Crave, it’s the better-rated product in this comparison.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no free tier, freemium model, or monthly per-room charges. There are no implementation fees or hidden costs listed.
Laso Experience has no publicly available pricing details, which may indicate a custom quote process. Without transparent pricing, it’s difficult to compare value directly, but Crave’s clear pricing model offers more predictability.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or has limited budget, as Crave’s extensive features might be more than you need.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a full-service, operational app with extensive integrations.
Crave Mobile Platform is a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile engagement system designed for hotels seeking operational automation and seamless integrations. Its extensive feature set and proven support make it suitable for larger, full-service hotels that want to streamline service delivery and enhance guest experience.
Laso Experience centers on personalized guest engagement and revenue optimization using AI and automation tools. It’s better suited for hotels focusing on building guest relationships and increasing ancillary sales through targeted marketing.
If your hotel needs a proven, versatile platform with extensive operational features, go with Crave. For properties prioritizing guest intimacy, personalization, and incremental revenue, Laso might be the right choice, though it currently lacks recent reviews to validate its performance.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Mobile Platform and Laso Experience share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| App download | ||
| Apple Pay | ||
| Digital Menu | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| In-Venue Ordering | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Payments | ||
| QR Codes | ||
| Web Based (Appless) |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Mobile Platform and Laso Experience share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Mobile Platform offers 17 verified integration partners, while Laso Experience offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Mobile Platform leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Mobile Platform: No. Laso Experience: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 75 and LasoExperience has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor